CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.3/10
1.3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
El misionero estadounidense John Chau, de 26 años, fue asesinado cuando intentaba entrar en contacto con un grupo indígena frente a las costas de la India, una de las últimas comunidades del... Leer todoEl misionero estadounidense John Chau, de 26 años, fue asesinado cuando intentaba entrar en contacto con un grupo indígena frente a las costas de la India, una de las últimas comunidades del planeta que aún viven aisladas.El misionero estadounidense John Chau, de 26 años, fue asesinado cuando intentaba entrar en contacto con un grupo indígena frente a las costas de la India, una de las últimas comunidades del planeta que aún viven aisladas.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 12 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The podcast Behind the B has an incredible series on this event and the history of colonialist and neighboring people involving themselves with the very unwilling North Sentinelese people that was very informative and interesting and made it very clear that these people want to be left alone and reinforcing that what Chau did was reckless, stupid, arrogant and selfish. I highly recommend the podcast if you want to actually learn about what happened, including what John did in the lead up to going to the island that helped him rationalize his decision. This documentary is borderline harmful in glorifying this man and treating him like a dreamer with a calling instead of a selfish moron while making the people he endangered take a back seat to this wannabe colonialist.
What a horrible doc. This could have been so interesting but they spent 90% of it on his background and 10% on the actual mission. What a waste.
How do the filmmakers not realize what is interesting about this story? It isn't John, or his father's journal. An hour in, and we're still nowhere near him actually attempting to go to the island. Then they just skate through that part, completely leaving out the most interesting details of the story.
Man, this was frustrating. Complete and total waste of time. You will learn more about north sentinel and this story from five minutes on Wikipedia. Hopefully someone remakes this story properly.
How do the filmmakers not realize what is interesting about this story? It isn't John, or his father's journal. An hour in, and we're still nowhere near him actually attempting to go to the island. Then they just skate through that part, completely leaving out the most interesting details of the story.
Man, this was frustrating. Complete and total waste of time. You will learn more about north sentinel and this story from five minutes on Wikipedia. Hopefully someone remakes this story properly.
First, to those complaining this is "too Christian", it's anything but. This documentary tries to ride the line and show multiple sides, but it leans heavier to the "he was misguided" side with some strong digs toward evangelicals and missionary work in general. It is anything but sympathetic to mission work and goes out of its way to highlight all the "damage" done by missionaries, or at the very least, the wasted efforts (by interviewing a missionary turned atheist).
I appreciated the various points of view and the attempt to be impartial, but several things gummed up this documentary.
The animation was not appealing to me. I would have preferred re-enactments or a different animation style. It seemed cheap and cheesy at times, though still effective and better than nothing.
The editing was confusing, leaving me wondering what the point of the documentary was. For a documentary about such a focused and driven (misguided or not) young man, the film it self was far less confident and focused, meandering from non-commitment, to moments of sympathy, then on to scathing appraisals of disagreement, and finally landing with an awkward sense of off-balance closure with a religious, but non-Christian, poem by the dad.
I felt like this film tried to be something everyone could appreciate, but ended up being something that probably won't please the skeptics or the believers. We might assume that's the expected outcome of neutral journalism, but it felt too cobbled together and forced to seem relevant.
The information was fascinating, but the film, for me, was disappointing.
I appreciated the various points of view and the attempt to be impartial, but several things gummed up this documentary.
The animation was not appealing to me. I would have preferred re-enactments or a different animation style. It seemed cheap and cheesy at times, though still effective and better than nothing.
The editing was confusing, leaving me wondering what the point of the documentary was. For a documentary about such a focused and driven (misguided or not) young man, the film it self was far less confident and focused, meandering from non-commitment, to moments of sympathy, then on to scathing appraisals of disagreement, and finally landing with an awkward sense of off-balance closure with a religious, but non-Christian, poem by the dad.
I felt like this film tried to be something everyone could appreciate, but ended up being something that probably won't please the skeptics or the believers. We might assume that's the expected outcome of neutral journalism, but it felt too cobbled together and forced to seem relevant.
The information was fascinating, but the film, for me, was disappointing.
Why on earth do people feel the need to force their views and opinions on others?
Especially ones that live in the middle of nowhere and have made it clear they do not want to be contacted?
I actually think this makes religious nutters look even worse than I thought possible.
I've got a great idea why don't I go and force my opinions and views on other people that aren't interested!? There in lies the problem with the world and this piece of garbage.
The movie romanticised him way too much in the beginning and I actually think he got what he deserved...I know that may sound harsh, but I think the moral of the story is leave people to live in peace and mind you own business.
Especially ones that live in the middle of nowhere and have made it clear they do not want to be contacted?
I actually think this makes religious nutters look even worse than I thought possible.
I've got a great idea why don't I go and force my opinions and views on other people that aren't interested!? There in lies the problem with the world and this piece of garbage.
The movie romanticised him way too much in the beginning and I actually think he got what he deserved...I know that may sound harsh, but I think the moral of the story is leave people to live in peace and mind you own business.
I read the story of John Chai before. Yes, he was someone's son and a lot of people's friend. But frankly... He was an a$$hole. He could have killed those poor people. There should have been ZERO perspective told from any evangelicals. There shouldn't be any validation that what he did was remotely acceptable. This kid has a messiah complex and caused nothing but pain and suffering to his parents and friends. The disgusting sermon in the end shouldn't have even been featured. To sum things up..
"Whether it's a sweet tribal tattoo or being killed by an isolated indigenous tribe, you just messed up the family Christmas photo"
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesFeatures King Kong (1933)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Mission?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 58,377
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 30,409
- 15 oct 2023
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 69,830
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta