CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.7/10
2.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Sigue a científicos que analizan pruebas subterráneas de hace más de 250.000 años que plantean interrogantes sobre los primeros parientes de los humanos modernos y lo que significa ser human... Leer todoSigue a científicos que analizan pruebas subterráneas de hace más de 250.000 años que plantean interrogantes sobre los primeros parientes de los humanos modernos y lo que significa ser humano.Sigue a científicos que analizan pruebas subterráneas de hace más de 250.000 años que plantean interrogantes sobre los primeros parientes de los humanos modernos y lo que significa ser humano.
Keneiloe Molopyane
- Self - Lead Excavator
- (as Dr. Keneiloe Molopyane)
Opiniones destacadas
Not really worth a 600 word review unfortunately. But fine. This could have might have been an interesting or even fascinating anthropology discovery story as implied and stated by the producers in the trailer and description. But in reality there is very little science here. About 20 minutes in total - and that's generous - of the doc has science in it - about ostensibly a possible new genus Homo species these paleoanthropologists call Homo Naledi. The problem is it's just a small team from nowhere USA who haven't as of yet gained any national or international scientific corroboration of their find. They imagine a ton of wild theories about their discovery, all interesting but unfounded. So instead they spend a good hour or more filming things like "can this heavy-set man fit through a small cave opening?" Just not science.
I did enjoy this because I was interested in the subject. I wanted to see the bones, hear what the actual physical discoveries were, etc.
What I got instead was an attempt to tell a story that seemed more for entertainment than actual scientific hypothesis.
There were also some truly concerning moments like when the supposed head of archeology for the project suddenly asks (in the middle of doing measurements) "are we measuring in centimeters or millimeters?" Shouldn't that be well established at that point?
The animations were completely unnecessary and much too speculative. Generally there was way too much romanticizing of these ancient creatures. I don't like the tendency to project a spiritual or religious meaning onto everything they did.
It almost feels condescending. Like they thought the viewers would be bored with pure science so they had to embellish it like a Disney movie to get people interested.
What I got instead was an attempt to tell a story that seemed more for entertainment than actual scientific hypothesis.
There were also some truly concerning moments like when the supposed head of archeology for the project suddenly asks (in the middle of doing measurements) "are we measuring in centimeters or millimeters?" Shouldn't that be well established at that point?
The animations were completely unnecessary and much too speculative. Generally there was way too much romanticizing of these ancient creatures. I don't like the tendency to project a spiritual or religious meaning onto everything they did.
It almost feels condescending. Like they thought the viewers would be bored with pure science so they had to embellish it like a Disney movie to get people interested.
It starts off pretty good, but quickly descents into a very speculative realm. At one point they claim that these creatures had to use fire in the cave, otherwise they couldn't find their ways. Right, is this what rodents do when navigating caves? I haven't seen many torch carrying mice lately. Or, who knows, perhaps the cave layout changed in 250k years and used to be light coming from somewhere. All questions that popped in my head, none of which were answered.
There are no counter arguments whatsoever. These people love their jobs, that's obvious, but I'm missing a different perspective. A different take on their theories that could explain the observed as well. Now everything is presented as fact, which it clearly is not.
There are no counter arguments whatsoever. These people love their jobs, that's obvious, but I'm missing a different perspective. A different take on their theories that could explain the observed as well. Now everything is presented as fact, which it clearly is not.
I think the subject matter is super interesting and the cinematography is really great.
However, I feel like the Scientists have done the classic poker term of "falling in love with your hand" meaning, they are making very bold statements, leaning towards calling them facts about something that is purely speculative.
I would love to see or hear from another team of Scientists that have little or no knowledge of this subject matter and to hear what their conclusions are.
I personally think there are some other obvious ways and methods that these remains could have made it to their final resting spots.
None the less, if you're into science, dawn of human and cave exploration, you'll enjoy this. I did.
I respect the dedication and years that the Scientists have put in here. Their passion is palpable, albeit possibly a bit one sided.
However, I feel like the Scientists have done the classic poker term of "falling in love with your hand" meaning, they are making very bold statements, leaning towards calling them facts about something that is purely speculative.
I would love to see or hear from another team of Scientists that have little or no knowledge of this subject matter and to hear what their conclusions are.
I personally think there are some other obvious ways and methods that these remains could have made it to their final resting spots.
None the less, if you're into science, dawn of human and cave exploration, you'll enjoy this. I did.
I respect the dedication and years that the Scientists have put in here. Their passion is palpable, albeit possibly a bit one sided.
The subject in itself is very interesting, which helps the documentary, which is also very well produced.
However, I felt that scientists seem too passionate about the subject to give a more balanced or less biased opinion.
In addition, at a certain point the chief scientist passes by a cave location and makes an incredible discovery. However, how many did not pass by there? How could they not see?
The life and culture of Homo Naledi seemed too romanticized to me, with a lot of speculation and no dissenting voices.
That's why everything in the documentary seems to me to be partly scripted, disclosing possibly previous discoveries as if they were made in front of the cameras.
However, I felt that scientists seem too passionate about the subject to give a more balanced or less biased opinion.
In addition, at a certain point the chief scientist passes by a cave location and makes an incredible discovery. However, how many did not pass by there? How could they not see?
The life and culture of Homo Naledi seemed too romanticized to me, with a lot of speculation and no dissenting voices.
That's why everything in the documentary seems to me to be partly scripted, disclosing possibly previous discoveries as if they were made in front of the cameras.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Unknown: Cave of Bones?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Unknown: Cave of Bones
- Locaciones de filmación
- Sudáfrica(Production)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta