Alejandro Magno: La creación de un dios
Título original: Alexander: The Making of a God
Alejandro fue rey de la antigua ciudad griega de Macedonia, considerado uno de los mejores y más exitosos comandantes militares de la historia, y a los 30 años ya había creado uno de los may... Leer todoAlejandro fue rey de la antigua ciudad griega de Macedonia, considerado uno de los mejores y más exitosos comandantes militares de la historia, y a los 30 años ya había creado uno de los mayores imperios de la historia.Alejandro fue rey de la antigua ciudad griega de Macedonia, considerado uno de los mejores y más exitosos comandantes militares de la historia, y a los 30 años ya había creado uno de los mayores imperios de la historia.
Explorar episodios
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Alexander the Great: Hero or Conqueror' offers an engaging narrative with impressive visuals and strong performances, particularly in portraying Alexander and Darius. However, it faces criticism for historical inaccuracies, poor acting, and its hybrid format. Some viewers value its entertainment and artistic liberties, while others find it misleading and shallow. The depiction of Alexander's personal life sparks debate, making it an ambitious yet flawed series.
Opiniones destacadas
Maybe the creators didn't want to remake the Farrell Alexander. Or maybe there wasn't enough info that would be palatable to the Netflix audience that gets bored in the age of TikTok. Nita particularly good look at Alexander's life. The series starts with Al in exile at age 20. It leaves out his education with Aristotle and the taming of his famous horse. These two stories are part of the legend. Why they were left out is beyond me. Another reviewer noted the flaws in the armor worn by the troops. I can't speak to that but the horses were too large and the tack was off. I get really annoyed by that detail. Narrators pop in and out to provide sciencey exposition that stops the motion of the story. I'd suggest reading The Persian Boy instead of watching this series. And let's quit making the Persians the Evil Empire. It was a long lived and culturally diverse area that existed as part of the Silk Road. A series on Persia would be fascinating.
I found the documentary disappointing due to its inaccurate portrayal of historical figures, particularly Darius. The depiction of Darius with a turban and eyeliner seemed more akin to a caricature than a respectful representation of the Persian Emperor, who was a significant figure in establishing human rights. Persia was the cradle of art and architecture at the time and at its highest. This portrayal of Darius felt more like a misrepresentation, leaning towards an 'Arabic snake dancer' stereotype rather than a dignified leader of the largest empire of the time. It seemed as though the documentary was more a tribute to Alexander rather than an objective historical account, failing to accurately represent the facts and events of that era. This was a letdown, as I expected a documentary to offer a factual and unbiased view.
I am starting to notice a pattern.
You watch a Netflix series about some true historical figures, and you are shown some admirable things about them. The aesthetics are beautiful. You finish watching it, and you feel satisfied, and are glad to have been told an interesting chapter of history that you now feel you "know from beginning to end".
Then you later find out, through reading either the primary sources (or reading other people's reviews, as in the case of this series) that the series was actually wildly inaccurate, and in a suspicious way. A ton of really epic stuff was just LEFT OUT. They also added a lot of inaccurate stuff that makes the characters look bad.
The end result is that the story, and the characters portrayed, were watered down and made mediocre in the series, contrasted to the actual real story.
I've seen this with the abominable series "The Last Czars", and now also with this Alexander series. I also Notice that there is some overlap between these 2 series, regarding the writers behind them!
I can't help but wonder if this is done intentionally, to wipe away our history? As an analogy, it's like people going to see a huge epic temple that they've heard about, but someone has set up a cheap mediocre replica on the way, so that the people will stop there instead, and not see the real one.
You watch a Netflix series about some true historical figures, and you are shown some admirable things about them. The aesthetics are beautiful. You finish watching it, and you feel satisfied, and are glad to have been told an interesting chapter of history that you now feel you "know from beginning to end".
Then you later find out, through reading either the primary sources (or reading other people's reviews, as in the case of this series) that the series was actually wildly inaccurate, and in a suspicious way. A ton of really epic stuff was just LEFT OUT. They also added a lot of inaccurate stuff that makes the characters look bad.
The end result is that the story, and the characters portrayed, were watered down and made mediocre in the series, contrasted to the actual real story.
I've seen this with the abominable series "The Last Czars", and now also with this Alexander series. I also Notice that there is some overlap between these 2 series, regarding the writers behind them!
I can't help but wonder if this is done intentionally, to wipe away our history? As an analogy, it's like people going to see a huge epic temple that they've heard about, but someone has set up a cheap mediocre replica on the way, so that the people will stop there instead, and not see the real one.
I'm impressed at least by the fact that Netflix is paying more attention to audiences who are interested in history.
Having said that, I think the hardcore history audience will also demand a lot from the Netflix series.
They're such nerds that they've read everything and expect Netflix to present it to the public just like the books.
It's a docudrama with very strong drama, but it could be worse.
There are a lot of inaccuracies it is true. But giving this documentary 1/10 because you think "Alexander was Greek not Macedonian" reveals how stupid you are despite knowing more about Alexander than the producers.
Having said that, I think the hardcore history audience will also demand a lot from the Netflix series.
They're such nerds that they've read everything and expect Netflix to present it to the public just like the books.
It's a docudrama with very strong drama, but it could be worse.
There are a lot of inaccuracies it is true. But giving this documentary 1/10 because you think "Alexander was Greek not Macedonian" reveals how stupid you are despite knowing more about Alexander than the producers.
Yet again, Netflix makes the same mistakes, making everything feel like a joke.
This feels like a cheap soap opera instead of a documentary. The inaccuracy of the historical events are insane, the acting is very sad and forced. Nothing is explained about Alexander's life, they only induced fake drama which makes no sense at all.
This is a shame, Alexander has always been one of my favourite rulers from the past and I was hoping for some new information or at least a good interpretation of the ones all of us know.
This is another Netflix fail, do not waste your time if you are a history nerd, all you will end up on with is being sad and frustrated.
This feels like a cheap soap opera instead of a documentary. The inaccuracy of the historical events are insane, the acting is very sad and forced. Nothing is explained about Alexander's life, they only induced fake drama which makes no sense at all.
This is a shame, Alexander has always been one of my favourite rulers from the past and I was hoping for some new information or at least a good interpretation of the ones all of us know.
This is another Netflix fail, do not waste your time if you are a history nerd, all you will end up on with is being sad and frustrated.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis is no clear historical evidence that Alexander and Stateira, Darius' wife, had a sexual relationship. In the series, historian Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones cites Plutarch as saying that Stateira died in childbirth and suggests that the child could not have been Darius', given how long she has been separated from him. Yet Plutarch had also written that Alexander showed no interest in Stateira. Plutarch also said that Darius heard the news about his wife's death from an escaped eunuch, who'd been captured along with the women. The eunuch had defended Alexander, suggesting that "[Darius] should even admire Alexander for having shown greater self-restraint in dealing with Persian women than valor against Persian men."
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Alexander: The Making of a God
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución45 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What was the official certification given to Alejandro Magno: La creación de un dios (2024) in Canada?
Responda