CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.9/10
3.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaInspired by a real-life scandal in which prison inmates are temporarily released from prison to work as contract killers on behalf of politicians and high ranking military officials.Inspired by a real-life scandal in which prison inmates are temporarily released from prison to work as contract killers on behalf of politicians and high ranking military officials.Inspired by a real-life scandal in which prison inmates are temporarily released from prison to work as contract killers on behalf of politicians and high ranking military officials.
- Premios
- 20 premios ganados y 32 nominaciones en total
Baldo Marro
- Warden Esteban
- (as Baldo Maro)
Opiniones destacadas
I don't know how famous the actors are in Phillipines, but they all seem like they are not into their roles enough.
The handsome cop somehow good at flexing his muscular appearance thorough the film more than acting with only a sad gaze, not much else emotion. He was so passive and clueless, almost like a pawn on chessboard with one use: sacrified for bigger piecies.
The ugly cop was even worse. His horrendously dumb face can't make me think he on good side. He acts like a local supermarket's security who would get drunk after work, than a veteran police officer who fight corruption. A pitiful, pathetic character (and not in a good way).
Now let turn to the "bad" side characters. The handsome youngster - very good looking indeed. But he sticks out like an elephant. Dress too modest, smile too bright, cute face, even his skin tone shine through the whole scene. And since his character was a long term prison inmate, that outlook didn't fit at all. His acting was limited with some range, he can't really act with his eyes, his aura screams "I'm a pretty boy and I will pose only for the camera". Overall, he showed only the shell of a type of character - the son figure - and not much else.
The main role, very much like Russell Crowe - rugged middle age man with rough past - made a decent job. His eyes hide complex gazes, his face twisted and turn when needed, good presence in every scene he on. He the only actor that really blend in, become his role.
The movie effectively show audiences its world - bleak, dark, stinky, and no way to escape. But it needs more believable characters to become good, characters with distinct traits, with real chemistry, and dont look so out of the plot.
The handsome cop somehow good at flexing his muscular appearance thorough the film more than acting with only a sad gaze, not much else emotion. He was so passive and clueless, almost like a pawn on chessboard with one use: sacrified for bigger piecies.
The ugly cop was even worse. His horrendously dumb face can't make me think he on good side. He acts like a local supermarket's security who would get drunk after work, than a veteran police officer who fight corruption. A pitiful, pathetic character (and not in a good way).
Now let turn to the "bad" side characters. The handsome youngster - very good looking indeed. But he sticks out like an elephant. Dress too modest, smile too bright, cute face, even his skin tone shine through the whole scene. And since his character was a long term prison inmate, that outlook didn't fit at all. His acting was limited with some range, he can't really act with his eyes, his aura screams "I'm a pretty boy and I will pose only for the camera". Overall, he showed only the shell of a type of character - the son figure - and not much else.
The main role, very much like Russell Crowe - rugged middle age man with rough past - made a decent job. His eyes hide complex gazes, his face twisted and turn when needed, good presence in every scene he on. He the only actor that really blend in, become his role.
The movie effectively show audiences its world - bleak, dark, stinky, and no way to escape. But it needs more believable characters to become good, characters with distinct traits, with real chemistry, and dont look so out of the plot.
I am surprised to see this movie is just 6+ here on IMDb as it's definitely an 8+ movie. It's full of action. They movie has good acting, good story and good speed. It's never boring and is made well. There is lots of action and it's done very well. The actors are well cast and their acting is good too. There is a story and we get to see the life in Manila. The shooting is realistic and so are the action scenes.
See the trailer before you decide to skip this movie as that will change your mind. Don't go by the rating here as this is definitely skewed (I am not sure why?)This movie is way better than that and lot's of Hollywood action movies. If you like action movies this is for you and it will keep you on edge right through.
See the trailer before you decide to skip this movie as that will change your mind. Don't go by the rating here as this is definitely skewed (I am not sure why?)This movie is way better than that and lot's of Hollywood action movies. If you like action movies this is for you and it will keep you on edge right through.
ON THE JOB is a dark, dingy, and rather sweaty Filipino thriller that has some stylistic similarities to the far superior METRO MANILA. Unfortunately this is ultimately a much lesser work in which promise at the outset soon devolves thank to some rather pedestrian writing. ON THE JOB is too long, too slow, and marred by unsympathetic characters who you don't give two hoots about despite their various problems.
The story involves a real-life scandal around career criminals being given day release from prison to go around working as political assassins. It sounds great, but after the umpteenth long-winded scene of characters arguing and discussing their plight, it becomes merely average rather than profound. It doesn't help that the only truly likable character is the young crusading cop whose character is let down by possibly the most unsatisfying climax in a film ever.
Director Erik Matti performs an able job behind the camera, creating a gritty and realistic look that brings out the poverty and grime of the surroundings. Individual scenes are powerful, and there are one or two good action moments, but the choreography is sometimes sloppy and the tedium occasionally overwhelming. These factors conspire to make ON THE JOB a distinctly average movie when it should by all rights be a good one.
The story involves a real-life scandal around career criminals being given day release from prison to go around working as political assassins. It sounds great, but after the umpteenth long-winded scene of characters arguing and discussing their plight, it becomes merely average rather than profound. It doesn't help that the only truly likable character is the young crusading cop whose character is let down by possibly the most unsatisfying climax in a film ever.
Director Erik Matti performs an able job behind the camera, creating a gritty and realistic look that brings out the poverty and grime of the surroundings. Individual scenes are powerful, and there are one or two good action moments, but the choreography is sometimes sloppy and the tedium occasionally overwhelming. These factors conspire to make ON THE JOB a distinctly average movie when it should by all rights be a good one.
On The Job is exciting not only because of its story that tackled the gun-for-hire business, something that maybe unique in the Philippines, because of its rampant killings; it is also exciting because the birth of new Philippine cinema is now palpable.
The past years have seen new writers and directors handle different urban poor stories, this one not only gives us a glimpse on the machinery of the killing business and how it affects the lives of the poor, but also let us see the powerful rich (the military) that runs the country.
Every actor did a good job, although I feel Angel Aquino looks a little too glamorous for her role. The script was believable, the pacing was fast, the characters were given enough time to develop (except maybe Marquez's son's story that did not develop further) and most of all, I love the realistic ending. I also like that the movie left a glimmer of hope when the police partner recovered the phone. With all the horrors happening in the society, there is still hope.
I think this is one of the year's best, I am happy that people went to see this movie and I hope other worthy films will get wider audience next time.
The past years have seen new writers and directors handle different urban poor stories, this one not only gives us a glimpse on the machinery of the killing business and how it affects the lives of the poor, but also let us see the powerful rich (the military) that runs the country.
Every actor did a good job, although I feel Angel Aquino looks a little too glamorous for her role. The script was believable, the pacing was fast, the characters were given enough time to develop (except maybe Marquez's son's story that did not develop further) and most of all, I love the realistic ending. I also like that the movie left a glimmer of hope when the police partner recovered the phone. With all the horrors happening in the society, there is still hope.
I think this is one of the year's best, I am happy that people went to see this movie and I hope other worthy films will get wider audience next time.
The story and pacing smoothly complimented each other. I like how the intensity just builds up right from the get go during the first scene up until the last one. Wonderfully moody cinematography combines with an excellent soundtrack and some breathlessly tight editing to create a surprisingly dark and nihilistic film.
It's also great to see characters that were fleshed out especially that of the three main characters. We get to know them more instead of simply just following what they do. This is one of the things I like about the film in terms of characterization, we get a glimpse of their individual lives as opposed to just going right at the center of the conflict.
This film pretty much shows what an ensemble really is. There are really no small roles here, as everyone's given something to do and they all did their parts well. From the opening assassination to the hospital shootout to the sequence that closes the film, the action beats in "On the Job" are technically polished while simultaneously visceral—even intimate—in their brutality. Matti and his cohorts have scored a home-run here.
It's also great to see characters that were fleshed out especially that of the three main characters. We get to know them more instead of simply just following what they do. This is one of the things I like about the film in terms of characterization, we get a glimpse of their individual lives as opposed to just going right at the center of the conflict.
This film pretty much shows what an ensemble really is. There are really no small roles here, as everyone's given something to do and they all did their parts well. From the opening assassination to the hospital shootout to the sequence that closes the film, the action beats in "On the Job" are technically polished while simultaneously visceral—even intimate—in their brutality. Matti and his cohorts have scored a home-run here.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe poster shows Piolo Pascual's character, Francis uses a Desert Eagle. In the film, no one uses a Desert Eagle, but only an M1911 and a Beretta M9, both are actual Philippine National Police (PNP) standard-issue pistols.
- ConexionesEdited into En el trabajo (2021)
- Bandas sonorasMaskara
Composed by Pepe Smith/Juan de la Cruz Band
Performed by Dong Abay
Produced by Armi Millare and Erwin Romulo
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is On the Job?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 164,620
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 56,098
- 29 sep 2013
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 472,890
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 58 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was On the Job (2013) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda