El documental definitivo y exhaustivo sobre el excepcional escritor George Orwell.El documental definitivo y exhaustivo sobre el excepcional escritor George Orwell.El documental definitivo y exhaustivo sobre el excepcional escritor George Orwell.
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 8 premios ganados y 29 nominaciones en total
George Orwell
- Self - Novelist
- (material de archivo)
U Win Khine
- Self - Lead Immigration Officer, Myanmar
- (material de archivo)
Min Aung Hlaing
- Self - Prime Minister of Myanmar
- (material de archivo)
- (as General Min Aung Hlaing)
Augusto Pinochet
- Self - Supreme Head of the Nation
- (material de archivo)
- (as General Augusto Pinochet)
Ferdinand Marcos
- Self - President of the Philippines
- (material de archivo)
Yoweri Museveni
- Self - President of Uganda
- (material de archivo)
- (as General Yoweri Museveni)
Vladimir Putin
- Self - President of Russia
- (material de archivo)
Viktor Orbán
- Self - Prime Minister of Hungary
- (material de archivo)
George W. Bush
- Self - 43rd President of the United States
- (material de archivo)
- (as President George W. Bush)
Colin Powell
- Self - Secretary of State
- (material de archivo)
Victor Otto
- Self - Father of a Russian Soldier Killed Ukraine
- (material de archivo)
Ida Blair
- Self - Orwell's Mother
- (material de archivo)
Richard Blair
- Self - Orwell's Father
- (material de archivo)
Donald Trump
- Self - 45th President of the United States
- (material de archivo)
Sidney Powell
- Self - Attorney and Former Prosecutor
- (material de archivo)
Jordan Klepper
- Self - The Daily Show with Trevor Noah Corespondent
- (material de archivo)
Lawrence O'Donnell
- Self - Host, The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell
- (material de archivo)
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Watched it recently at a film festival. Go see it if you don't mind a tedious preachy clip show of historical footage with frequent bland voiceovers narrating Orwell's words, often with the background of a slow-moving vista of dull dreary Scotland. This sort of work comes off as a naive high school politics student trying to be original and edgy, since the film goes down the same predictable politically one-sided narratives (complete with sentimental instrumental soundtrack). Essentially a sophomoric propaganda piece with stale observations about government power that are already known by anyone familiar with Orwell's main works. Couldn't take it anymore, and we walked out near the end.
Edit: on second thought, I give it 2 stars instead of 1. The part about Orwell's time in Burma was mildly interesting.
Edit: on second thought, I give it 2 stars instead of 1. The part about Orwell's time in Burma was mildly interesting.
George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair, 1903-1050), author of such legendary novels as the allegorical Animal Farm and dystopian 1984, has been called one of the greatest and most insightful writers of the 20th Century. And, in light of recent history, he's also been widely regarded as one of the most prescient, a plainspoken scribe who clearly saw the future long before it happened and wasn't afraid to straightforwardly call it for what it would become. In recognition of that legacy, Orwell's life, work and outlooks are now the subject of this latest production from prolific activist documentarian Raoul Peck. The film weaves together a biography of the author, the central themes of his journalistic and literary works, and illustrations of how those notions have materialized in the "management" (or, one might more accurately say, manipulation) of social, political and world affairs over the years, with an especially heavy emphasis on the present day. The filmmaker cites myriad examples of these manifestations to show just how on target Orwell was in predicting what would lie ahead, both in the places where he lived (England, Spain and Burma (now Myanmar)), as well as other locales around the globe, including Russia, Ukraine, Haiti, France, Latin America, Asia, and, most importantly, the US. And, while Peck largely targets the policies and practices of the right, he's not afraid to take on anyone whose dogma is so rigid that it throws circumstances off balance for everyone. Most notably, though, the picture details just how insidious these initiatives can be, agendas accomplished through the skillful "handling" of language, media, beliefs and actions that lead to intentional, calculated and shameful obfuscation, creating purposely misleading impressions in the minds of an unwittingly susceptible public. The narrative places much emphasis on the signature double-talk expressions Orwell features in his narratives (especially 1984), including such meaningless phrases as "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery" and "Ignorance is strength," slogans that say nothing but become widely embraced with relentless and intimidating repetition. The director's inclusion of these references thus depicts the deliberate war on truth being waged by those in power who will do anything to maintain their control over it, particularly when dealing with a compliant, quiescent population. These themes are further supported by an array of clips from other fictional and documentary works, such as the 1954, 1956 and 1984 versions of "1984," "I, Daniel Blake" (2016), "Land and Freedom" (1995), "Minority Report" (2002), and "Orwell Rolls in His Grave" (2003), to name a few. And further enhancement is provided in numerous voiceover sequences from Orwell's own writings, deftly narrated by Damian Lewis. All told, these elements provide a comprehensive look at the author and his work, as well as its relevance in today's world. With that said, however, some aspects of this offering could use some work, most notably in the organization of its content, its overreliance at times on material that needs to be read (and that often flies by too quickly) and an occasional tendency toward redundancy, elements that have been known to intrude upon other films by this director. In addition, "Orwell: 2+ 2 = 5" has frequently been termed (and quite accurately at that) as the scariest picture of 2025, primarily due to its inclusion of some troubling graphic imagery (sensitive viewers take note). Nevertheless, this is an important film for our times, one that viewers should not be afraid to watch considering the stakes involved. Indeed, turning a blind eye might be easier to do in the moment - but probably not in the long run.
If the intention was to present a "shrill trumpet-call" in imitation of an Inner Party-directed Hate Week project, then mission accomplished.
The narrated George Orwell excerpts outshine anything assembled by the writer / director whose own political bias and blind spots mirror an Orwell quotation that's cited early in the film: "The opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude". IMO, Orwell: 2+2=5 is a political attitude that lacks artistry. Images and video are presented in a "We didn't start the fire" stream; there is no depth, no context and not even a discussion of the title formula, just clips from past portrayals of 1984. Overall, it's clumsily designed to manipulate the hate-filled and uninformed. It will do well in some circles.
Skip this film; better to read Mr. Orwell and a good Orwell biography.
The best I can say about Orwell: 2+2=5 is that the anticipation of seeing it encouraged me to re-read Nineteen Eighty-Four. I did also appreciate the clip from Terry Gilliam's Brazil; isolating the copy room scene made me wonder about the great preparation that was necessary to make the movements so fluid.
The narrated George Orwell excerpts outshine anything assembled by the writer / director whose own political bias and blind spots mirror an Orwell quotation that's cited early in the film: "The opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude". IMO, Orwell: 2+2=5 is a political attitude that lacks artistry. Images and video are presented in a "We didn't start the fire" stream; there is no depth, no context and not even a discussion of the title formula, just clips from past portrayals of 1984. Overall, it's clumsily designed to manipulate the hate-filled and uninformed. It will do well in some circles.
Skip this film; better to read Mr. Orwell and a good Orwell biography.
The best I can say about Orwell: 2+2=5 is that the anticipation of seeing it encouraged me to re-read Nineteen Eighty-Four. I did also appreciate the clip from Terry Gilliam's Brazil; isolating the copy room scene made me wonder about the great preparation that was necessary to make the movements so fluid.
I was ready to give this a chance, after all I turned up to see it at the London Film Festival with the director present. He had clearly done a lot of archival work and the opening sections were fair enough, Orwell's letter and diaries being accompanied by fine shots of Jura and great photos. But after half an hour the director then started to try something more ambitious and the whole thing fell apart as he bombarded us with the newsreel footage and footage from adaptations of 1984 that he thought would enhance the power of Orwell's words. Sadly if anything they diluted them.
Two massive howlers. First, the scenes from 1984 in which Big Brother is adored by a crowd are followed by people at the republican convention cheering Trump. But the latter is really pretty standard practice at party rallies in multi party democracies. That is not what Big Brother is about. Second, the director addresses what he takes to be today's version of newsspeak by taking a series of cliched expressions or euphemisms, but instead of unpacking them, he simply translates them into what he thinks they really mean, which he expressed on screen with a phrase of his own. The effect of all this is that the film is in the end a simplistic mess, like a not very good imitation of Adam Curtis.
Two massive howlers. First, the scenes from 1984 in which Big Brother is adored by a crowd are followed by people at the republican convention cheering Trump. But the latter is really pretty standard practice at party rallies in multi party democracies. That is not what Big Brother is about. Second, the director addresses what he takes to be today's version of newsspeak by taking a series of cliched expressions or euphemisms, but instead of unpacking them, he simply translates them into what he thinks they really mean, which he expressed on screen with a phrase of his own. The effect of all this is that the film is in the end a simplistic mess, like a not very good imitation of Adam Curtis.
Had high hopes for this movie to examine Orwell's thoughts on political systems and regimes with in-depth focus on parallels to modern day "newspeak" and breaking of collective willpower, but it does none of that. It's a series of sometimes no context images of death and dictators and Adobe Affect Effects text animations that are played along with snippets from his diary about his life. It does give more context about his writing, but no context for the historical events it shows or why it chooses to focus so heavily on Burma. It doesn't bring in any other historians or political analysts until the end and it's very brief and superficial. It primarily felt like I was watching a collection of movie clips of 1984 versions. Overall, I appreciate the subject matter and the recency of the content (e.g., the inclusion of the Gaza genocide and the MAGA ambivalence towards death for "the other team") but the movie wasn't as thought provoking as I was hoping and felt more like SparkNotes to 1984 for a Gen X audience, nothing groundbreaking if you've already read 1984 and have a basic understanding of politics and injustice.
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
These big screen releases can now be watched from the comfort of your couch.
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesEdited from Oliver Twist (1948)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Оруэлл: 2+2=5
- Locaciones de filmación
- Jura, Inner Hebrides, Escocia, Reino Unido(many locations)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 355,288
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 25,887
- 5 oct 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 415,517
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 59min(119 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta


