Agrega una trama en tu idiomaOn November 14, 1944, the U.S. Army's 2nd Ranger Battalion is tasked with besieging the German town of Bergstein and Hill 400; a highly strategic position that provides the Germans with high... Leer todoOn November 14, 1944, the U.S. Army's 2nd Ranger Battalion is tasked with besieging the German town of Bergstein and Hill 400; a highly strategic position that provides the Germans with high ground for artillery.On November 14, 1944, the U.S. Army's 2nd Ranger Battalion is tasked with besieging the German town of Bergstein and Hill 400; a highly strategic position that provides the Germans with high ground for artillery.
Justin Lee Dudo
- Private Petty
- (as Justin Dudo)
Andreas Gabriel
- Lt. Neumann
- (as Andreas Grabiel)
Curtis Arney
- German Soldier
- (sin créditos)
Andrew J. Forner
- Corporal Jensen
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Saw this movie listed with a couple of actors I like thought it might be a fun movie to watch. This was an insult to my father and my uncles who fought in the second world war. Me and my dad used to watch all the old gung ho, American movies From World War II and some of those were really cheesy and we loved them but this is an insult for the intelligence to people firing rifles with the bolts not even moving machine guns bullet belts aren't even moving while firing a nurse with really bad German accent. I would never recommend this movie to anyone. It is a total waste of time. There are so many better movies out there to watch than this one, particularly on the subject of World War II.
The fact that "well trained and resupplied German soldiers" (not the weak Polish kind, as the General described them), can be seen shooting a Thompson at 5:38 (behind the German holding an MP40), and another one shooting a Grease gun at around 5:59 (hiding behind the tree) made me giggle. If they are what the General describes, then there's no need for them to use US weapons. Not to mention the poor tactics, use of ranks, lingo, and what not.
Also, this movie only portrays what seems to be a incomplete squad from 2nd Rangers. Some of the roles in the squad seem to be replaced by ordinary riflemen. It should be mentioned that there were at least 457 enlisted men and 27 officers from 2nd Rangers who went up that hill. And a whole bunch of infantry before them, sustaining a minimum of 16,000 casualties.
It's inaccurate, the acting is stale. I can't say much good about this movie. This movie clearly missed out on military advisors, and perhaps some acting classes.
Also, this movie only portrays what seems to be a incomplete squad from 2nd Rangers. Some of the roles in the squad seem to be replaced by ordinary riflemen. It should be mentioned that there were at least 457 enlisted men and 27 officers from 2nd Rangers who went up that hill. And a whole bunch of infantry before them, sustaining a minimum of 16,000 casualties.
It's inaccurate, the acting is stale. I can't say much good about this movie. This movie clearly missed out on military advisors, and perhaps some acting classes.
How to do a better job on this production?
First, hire a military consultant. That would get by the majority of the issues.
Next, hiring an acting coach. Not a really expensive one. Maybe a director from the Little Theater of east New Jersey.
Taking these two steps would great enhance the production value of this movie.
Then the next step would be to follow just a little of the historical facts associated with this battle.
This film is almost a disservice to the memory of the heroes that fought in this battle.
Dialogue is awful, could could have used a little polishing.
If nothing else I learned to never watch a film directed by this guy.
First, hire a military consultant. That would get by the majority of the issues.
Next, hiring an acting coach. Not a really expensive one. Maybe a director from the Little Theater of east New Jersey.
Taking these two steps would great enhance the production value of this movie.
Then the next step would be to follow just a little of the historical facts associated with this battle.
This film is almost a disservice to the memory of the heroes that fought in this battle.
Dialogue is awful, could could have used a little polishing.
If nothing else I learned to never watch a film directed by this guy.
The very first scene was a dead giveaway that I was in for a crapfest. We have a lieutenant general from one division and a brigadier general from a different division, who's supposed to be the real-life Dutch Cota, but looks like he's going to keel over and die at any moment. These generals, a corps commander and an assistant division commander, without any staff anywhere to be seen, are giving a mission briefing to two lieutenants - platoon commanders. Admittedly, if these generals have nothing better to do while running a war, it's probably more efficient to cut out four levels of the chain of command and brief the lieutenants directly. These two platoon commanders are told that if they don't take Hill 400, the Allies will lose the war. General Cota mentions that he watched from Omaha Beach as the lieutenants, or one of them, scaled the cliff at Pointe-du-Hoc. This is pretty amazing, because I've been to both Omaha Beach and Pointe-du-Hoc twice, and not only are they blocked from view from each other by terrain, they are too far apart to see human beings even if they weren't blocked.
The lieutenants take their platoon out, which clearly hasn't been trained in small unit tactics, along with an embedded (a term that wasn't used in the 1940s) octogenarian photographer who is constantly taking photos of nothing, yet never uses up the film in his camera, because he never puts in a new roll.
Honestly, after the lame briefing by the generals I stopped paying much attention to the movie. I worked on my Duolingo lessons and occasionally looked up to see what implausibility was happening. I'm not even sure if I watched it until the end.
It just gets exhausting listing all the problems with these terrible independent films, one right after another. I don't know how these filmmakers make money performing these abortions.
The lieutenants take their platoon out, which clearly hasn't been trained in small unit tactics, along with an embedded (a term that wasn't used in the 1940s) octogenarian photographer who is constantly taking photos of nothing, yet never uses up the film in his camera, because he never puts in a new roll.
Honestly, after the lame briefing by the generals I stopped paying much attention to the movie. I worked on my Duolingo lessons and occasionally looked up to see what implausibility was happening. I'm not even sure if I watched it until the end.
It just gets exhausting listing all the problems with these terrible independent films, one right after another. I don't know how these filmmakers make money performing these abortions.
So they send out a platoon of 5 guys and a war photographer and they take the best defended hill in the first 30 minutes. Stopped watching at 44 minutes. Utter dross.fight scenes laughable. 2 machine gun nests taken by 4 guys and mo with carbines making a frontal assault with no cover. These guys also forgot to take their rations of grenades with them. If they had any they could have saved themselves a lot of grief in the fire fights. This hill should just have been obliterated with artillery and then assaulted by 2 tanks. No trenches, no minefields and 1 pillbox. Monte casino it was not. Thank goodness the yanks joined the war or we would all be speaking German.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresIn the opening scene General Weaver (William Baldwin), wearing the rank insignia of a lieutenant general, introduces himself as "General Weaver from the 8th Division". Divisions didn't and still don't have lieutenant generals. The highest rank in a division is a major general. A lieutenant general commands a corps, which is two or more divisions, or they can be the assistant commander of an army, which is two or more corps.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Assault on Hill 400?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- 1944 ヒュルトゲンの森の戦い
- Locaciones de filmación
- Búfalo, Nueva York, Estados Unidos(studio and exteriors)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta