Agrega una trama en tu idiomaAs her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This a great example of a film where everyone working to make tried so very hard to make it that they forgot to keep track of the pages of the script resulting in 1) Enormous plot holes, 2) opened story elements that are never closed or developed, and 3) cappers on story elements that never reached the final cut.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
Like many others I thought I was the movie Split as part the unbreakable, split trilogy but after 10 mins I guessed it wasn't gonna be "that" movie.... But I have a thing for watching a random films and watched it to the end and enjoyed it.... Worth a watch for sure especially if you enjoy watching humans being humans
I was very surprised when I received this movie, thinking it was a horror/thriller .. And I was presented with a light comedy that at some points had me in stitches with laughter.
The reality of weird nerds obsessed with bowling and movies, to the mixed up emotions of life being single at 30 . Leaves you relating to the movie on multiple levels.
Each of the characters are not only believable with its wonderful acting, but I found myself being able to put friends of my own in each character.
Jamie Buckner left little lacking in this light amusing flick, leaving me thinking "Another Chick Flick I Love .. DARN YOU!!" I gather the reason why most people rated this so low is because there was no high action, blood splatter moments. Just a bunch of friends, getting drunk, and giggling with each other .. what else is needed ?
The reality of weird nerds obsessed with bowling and movies, to the mixed up emotions of life being single at 30 . Leaves you relating to the movie on multiple levels.
Each of the characters are not only believable with its wonderful acting, but I found myself being able to put friends of my own in each character.
Jamie Buckner left little lacking in this light amusing flick, leaving me thinking "Another Chick Flick I Love .. DARN YOU!!" I gather the reason why most people rated this so low is because there was no high action, blood splatter moments. Just a bunch of friends, getting drunk, and giggling with each other .. what else is needed ?
I streamed this on an app i got from a friend. I thought i was watching that movie Split with the guy with the split personalities. After watching Unbreakable i felt there was no way they would still be on about bowling after 10mins.
I agree with the other two reviews here - its a good film and worth way more than the 3.3 rating. Making low budget films in this genre is the hardest thing. You never know if light comedy scenes are really going to work until they're cut together. This film is so close to being great and given a better budget and a couple more rewrites I'm sure it would have been. Towards the end it seems rushed and I bet they would have re-shot a couple of scenes had they had the money. Having said that the acting is superb and its really well shot and framed. The sound mix is not great but I imagine that's just the money for a really good dub that was lacking. All in all I liked it and would love to see these actors in more stuff.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaOne of three movies to be released in 2016 to be titled Split.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Split (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda