Lizzie Borden's Revenge

Breaking down the reason for 7 stars..

2 Stars for Mindy Robinson's out and about Mindys..

2 stars for Veronica Ricci's absolute hatred of clothing..

1 Star for Krystal Ellsworth's crazy sister portrayal... (and upskirt)

1 star Ginny You's Drunk performance.. method acting if I have ever seen it..

And last but not least 1 star for Bobby. Why is it Bobby's are always great characters... This guy had it all.. heroism, character development , one liners, one handed lock-picking, camera skills (more upskirting) ...

Ah, yes. Dennis Devine.

To paraphrase Withnail, I watched this movie by mistake on YouTube, on a tablet, while waiting for a delayed flight.

As someone else asked: why?

As in: why are such movies made? Who bankrolls 'em? Do they make any money? What is the unseen, unknown part of the equation here? I do not see it, I certainly do not know it...

To me, this movie seems like something a bunch of (probably drunk) friends could have come together to make using an iPhone camera - as a joke. You know, as something they'd later show to other friends - as a joke.

But it ain't that. It's an actual movie production (such as it is). And I don't get it. Is it - specifically - made for people who watch movies whilst drunk or stoned? Is there a whole, separate market (demography) for such movies that I'm not aware of? But - if so - er...WHY (again)? Wouldn't it be cheaper and more sustainable for everyone involved if that demography just watched random YouTube clips of - I don't know - fat dudes on trampolines, cats slapping unaware dogs, soccer players accidentally getting kicked in the nuts, and so on?

How are movies like this a part of the movie industry in the post-Internet era? (I guess that's what I'm asking).

Fascinating phenomenon.

Unless it's softcore porn, excessive nudity of beautiful young women for no reason really doesn't have any business being in a movie categorized as horror. The difference with movies like Friday the 13th or Halloween is that the sex and nudity is symbolic to breaking sexual abstinence, the killer is the punishment for that. This movie was just replete with shameless nudity in a non-porn genre to the point that it almost could be classified as porn. On top of that, the movie looks cheap, the gore effects are terrible, and the acting is god awful. It's as if the director just rounded up the most attractive women who were willing to get naked for him on camera. What a hunk of crap.

F

If this was meant to be a serious movie, they failed horribly. If they were attempting to make a XXX movie, it's better than some. Acting is horrible. Script is horrible. Lizzy Borden murders aren't even accurate. The lines are so bad. Feels like a toddler wrote it. Or a teen boy who dreamt of girl slumber party fantasies. Everyone in this is a horrible actor/actress, but great XXX movie stars. The characters are utterly bizarre. No one talks or acts like they do. So over the top. There's a character limit I'm trying to drag out here, but this is so bad. Hot chick's though so..........have fun.

Similar to 2011 film Bloody Mary, also starring Veronica Ricci. This is a lower budget homemade type horror slasher not to be taken too serious considering it's low cheap looking special effects and subpar acting. There is slightly more depth to like about this film compared to Bloody Mary. Featuring a sorority group of women it was expected their to be a showcase of women showing skin. Skin mostly shown from Veronica Ricci and briefly from Mindy Robinson in a brief role (which was disappointing considering her character. She should have lasted longer).

Overall this is simply a non memorable cheap slasher with some urban tale revalating.