CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
4.9 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA single man tries to win a bet by getting a woman recovering from a broken engagement to marry him by Christmas.A single man tries to win a bet by getting a woman recovering from a broken engagement to marry him by Christmas.A single man tries to win a bet by getting a woman recovering from a broken engagement to marry him by Christmas.
Andrew W. Walker
- Aiden MacTiernan
- (as Andrew Walker)
Kimberley Sustad
- Vivian Patterson
- (as Kimberly Sustad)
Janet Gigliotti
- Caroller #1
- (as Janet Mary Gigliotti)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
10gehewe
Why does Hallmark make 30 new Christmas movies a year? It is because Great Movies like this led the way. The movie has a great cast (Arielle Kebbel and Andrew Walker in the leads), it is very funny, and it has it's touching moments. Kimberly Sustad played a great supporting role as the sister (she starred in Nine Lives of Christmas) and Peter Benson made for some of the funniest moments (he plays the detective in Aurora Teagarten). I recognized the dad (Eric Keenleyside) from roles in many of the Hallmark movies. The cast looked like a current day Hallmark movie with everyone 6 years younger. Sage Brocklebrand was also in the movie (he played McNabb in Psych).
Nobody should watch Hallmark films with massively high expectations, their Christmas output particularly. If a Hallmark fan or wanting to see as many Christmas films as possible, expectations would understandably be higher. They are very formulaic with most of them being more of the same narratively and structurally, apart from sporadic attempts at changes of pace. There are a fair share of them though that are surprisingly above average and even good amidst the many average and less ones.
'Bride for Christmas' from 2012 is one of those surprisingly above average Hallmark efforts. Was expecting it to be too simplistic and predictable, with the rather generic title not showing much promise. Although it is a long way from a Christmas classic or perfect, 'Bride for Christmas' is a example of not judging a film by its title and to watch with an open mind and know what to expect. As far as Hallmark Christmas/wedding films go, this fares quite favourably.
There are more good things than not so good things, but there are a few drawbacks and am going to mention those first. The film did feel rushed at times, with some events jumping about a bit too much with not enough time to breathe. This is especially true of the development of the central relationship and conflict, which moves too unrealistically fast.
Predictability is expected in a Hallmark film, and there are not that many surprises in 'Bride for Christmas', especially in the final act which is pretty much exactly how it maps out in many other efforts of theirs. Some of the music could have been used less and been less loud.
However there are so many good things in 'Bride for Christmas'. It is visually pleasing and has a professional look. The appropriately festive locations especially. Enough of the soundtrack is nostalgic and pleasant enough. The direction is accommodating while not going through the motions. The film is also very enlivened by the two leads, which was a relief after struggling through 'Blue Ridge Mountain Christmas' recently which had poor lead performances and even poorer chemistry. Arielle Kebbel (in one of her better Hallmark outings) and Andrew Walker are very engaging in their roles and their chemistry is genuinely charming.
Kimberly Sustad sparkles in her supporting role and Peter Benson is a lot of fun without being annoying. The chemistry between the whole cast, all on solid form, is never disconnected. Moeover, the dialogue is tighter and less stilted than a lot of Hallmark Christmas films and the cheese and sentiment isn't as much. There are a lot of funny moments and other parts genuinely touched. The story is very predictable admittedly, but it still engaged me and was charming and heart-warming while not taking itself too seriously. Did appreciate too that there was more to usual. The characters may be cliched, but they came over to me as likeable enough and any negative character traits didn't come over as over the top like can be the case in Hallmark Christmas films. Actually cared for these characters, not the case with a lot of recently seen Christmas films.
Overall, nice film. 7/10
'Bride for Christmas' from 2012 is one of those surprisingly above average Hallmark efforts. Was expecting it to be too simplistic and predictable, with the rather generic title not showing much promise. Although it is a long way from a Christmas classic or perfect, 'Bride for Christmas' is a example of not judging a film by its title and to watch with an open mind and know what to expect. As far as Hallmark Christmas/wedding films go, this fares quite favourably.
There are more good things than not so good things, but there are a few drawbacks and am going to mention those first. The film did feel rushed at times, with some events jumping about a bit too much with not enough time to breathe. This is especially true of the development of the central relationship and conflict, which moves too unrealistically fast.
Predictability is expected in a Hallmark film, and there are not that many surprises in 'Bride for Christmas', especially in the final act which is pretty much exactly how it maps out in many other efforts of theirs. Some of the music could have been used less and been less loud.
However there are so many good things in 'Bride for Christmas'. It is visually pleasing and has a professional look. The appropriately festive locations especially. Enough of the soundtrack is nostalgic and pleasant enough. The direction is accommodating while not going through the motions. The film is also very enlivened by the two leads, which was a relief after struggling through 'Blue Ridge Mountain Christmas' recently which had poor lead performances and even poorer chemistry. Arielle Kebbel (in one of her better Hallmark outings) and Andrew Walker are very engaging in their roles and their chemistry is genuinely charming.
Kimberly Sustad sparkles in her supporting role and Peter Benson is a lot of fun without being annoying. The chemistry between the whole cast, all on solid form, is never disconnected. Moeover, the dialogue is tighter and less stilted than a lot of Hallmark Christmas films and the cheese and sentiment isn't as much. There are a lot of funny moments and other parts genuinely touched. The story is very predictable admittedly, but it still engaged me and was charming and heart-warming while not taking itself too seriously. Did appreciate too that there was more to usual. The characters may be cliched, but they came over to me as likeable enough and any negative character traits didn't come over as over the top like can be the case in Hallmark Christmas films. Actually cared for these characters, not the case with a lot of recently seen Christmas films.
Overall, nice film. 7/10
I've been binging on Hallmark movies this Xmas week. I know many use the ole formula. I look for best rated, good chemistry and stories that sound to be most interesting dare I say 'different' i.e. story lines, locations. We all agree that from the starting gate we know this is Runaway bride run amuck. Super damaged goods. Then, Aiden makes a crazy, horrid bet. I mean, he's going to prank an innocent young woman with a false marriage proposal. OK...we suspend disbelief that he could be so cruel, especially when he's matched with Jessie who has herself basically done this to three guys. Did I mention that Jessie is drop dead gorgeous! Sort of a Jessica Alba clone, I think.
Since I know how all Hallmark movies end I am taking a break, with about 15 mintues to go on this one. I had to stop when the idiot screen writers commit the same 'crime' I've seen too often. In K-dramas they use an easy tool. The screen goes dark and voila, signage on the screen says ONE YEAR LATER! I'm not listing any of this as 'spoiler' because it is basically not possible to spoil such Hallmark movies. We know from scene one, 100% that the two will wind up together. Therein is the HUGE plot hole. This and similar Hallmark movies show a proposal and no engagement or no period of engagement. Totally insufficient time to know one another. I mean propose after weeks of 'non-dating', one kiss, and voila, time to buy the wedding dress and plan the wedding. Please, Hallmark, use the fade, then ONE YEAR LATER or even SIX MONTHS LATER before we see a wedding dress, wedding plans or an actual wedding. This might give them time to actually 'date.' In this and other Hallmark movies the eliminate all dating going instead from one kiss to marriage. Totally unnecessary if done right.
Since I know how all Hallmark movies end I am taking a break, with about 15 mintues to go on this one. I had to stop when the idiot screen writers commit the same 'crime' I've seen too often. In K-dramas they use an easy tool. The screen goes dark and voila, signage on the screen says ONE YEAR LATER! I'm not listing any of this as 'spoiler' because it is basically not possible to spoil such Hallmark movies. We know from scene one, 100% that the two will wind up together. Therein is the HUGE plot hole. This and similar Hallmark movies show a proposal and no engagement or no period of engagement. Totally insufficient time to know one another. I mean propose after weeks of 'non-dating', one kiss, and voila, time to buy the wedding dress and plan the wedding. Please, Hallmark, use the fade, then ONE YEAR LATER or even SIX MONTHS LATER before we see a wedding dress, wedding plans or an actual wedding. This might give them time to actually 'date.' In this and other Hallmark movies the eliminate all dating going instead from one kiss to marriage. Totally unnecessary if done right.
Jessie (Arielle Kebbel) is about to tie the knot with her third fiancé. She is in a white gown and guests are waiting for her grand entrance. But, as Princess Vespa, she goes right past the alter and out of the ceremony. Nobody is pleased. Certainly not her fiancé Mike, who proposed on a Jumbotron. Nor is her sister and business partner Victoria or Jessie's grandkids minded parents. But, it was the right choice, as Jessie realizes it wasn't true love. From now on, she tells herself, she will concentrate on her job and her volunteer work at an animal shelter. Meanwhile, Aiden (Andrew K. Walker) is having a card game with three of his male, married friends. As the only bachelor present and seemingly confirmed, he takes on a bet from the others. It involves getting a woman to say "yes" to his proposal before Christmas Day. So, guess what? The first lovely lady that Aiden casts a serious eye on is Jessie, at an art gallery. Victoria tries to get her sis to make a connection with the really cute man but, naturally, Jessie remembers what her present agenda is. Thus, the only exchange made between the two singles is Jessie's biz card, presented to Aiden. Since she is an interior decorator, the betting man hires the dog lover to re-do his condo. Since this requires many an hour of discussion at the bachelor pad, some of Jessie's reluctance vanishes. But, since Mike is still trying to win Jessie back and there is always the possibility that Jessie will find out about "the wager", will there be a future for J and A? You bet! This lovely Holiday movie is just a slam dunk for romcom fans. It features an attractive cast, a beautiful setting (San Francisco), knockout costumes, a sweet, funny script, and a zestful direction. Yes, some of the elements are "borrowed" but no one will be blue after a view. For future sighs and smiles, get Bride for Christmas somewhere, somehow.
IMHO, the bet was a joke gone awry.
Given Aiden's (Andrew Walker) track record and Matt's (Peter Benson) sense of humor, Aiden proposing to anyone in a month was a strictly ludicrous idea....till oneupmanship kicked in.
Stars Arielle Kibbel and Andrew Walker, a better script and a strong supporting cast make all the difference here.
Yes, the premise is How to Lose a Runaway Bride. But eventually we get a payoff on both counts: mitigating factors on Jessie's broken engagements and a hilarious scene illustrating how competition X gambling runs amok.
Kudos to Kibbel and Walker for making Jessie and Aiden conflicted, and deeper than the shrill mess and elevated jerk lesser actors would have delivered.
Their all-important chemistry was excellent and believable, start to finish.
On a lesser note, I've wondered if Hallmark's preference for female leads with dated, unflattering hair was about making them look only so good, as opposed to poor styling. Here, Kibbel's look was consistently on the wrong side of the tousled versus messy divide.
Given Aiden's (Andrew Walker) track record and Matt's (Peter Benson) sense of humor, Aiden proposing to anyone in a month was a strictly ludicrous idea....till oneupmanship kicked in.
Stars Arielle Kibbel and Andrew Walker, a better script and a strong supporting cast make all the difference here.
Yes, the premise is How to Lose a Runaway Bride. But eventually we get a payoff on both counts: mitigating factors on Jessie's broken engagements and a hilarious scene illustrating how competition X gambling runs amok.
Kudos to Kibbel and Walker for making Jessie and Aiden conflicted, and deeper than the shrill mess and elevated jerk lesser actors would have delivered.
Their all-important chemistry was excellent and believable, start to finish.
On a lesser note, I've wondered if Hallmark's preference for female leads with dated, unflattering hair was about making them look only so good, as opposed to poor styling. Here, Kibbel's look was consistently on the wrong side of the tousled versus messy divide.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaSage Brocklebank is also a professional poker player.
- ErroresAbout an hour into the movie, when Jessie is telling Aiden that his floors are being refinished, Jessie's scarf is tied differently within the same scene. She is shown front then back and it can be seen the scarf is different.
- Citas
Hank Patterston: There's a lot of people you can live with, but there's only one you can't live without.
- ConexionesReferenced in The Cinema Snob: Dear Santa (2016)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Nevesta za bozic
- Locaciones de filmación
- Fort Langley, British Columbia, Canadá(Eighteen 27 Bistro is visible)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was A Bride for Christmas (2012) officially released in India in English?
Responda