Pac-Man y las Aventuras Fantasmales
Título original: Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.6/10
1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Pacman salva a Pacworld de los fantasmas con sus amigos Cyli y Spiral.Pacman salva a Pacworld de los fantasmas con sus amigos Cyli y Spiral.Pacman salva a Pacworld de los fantasmas con sus amigos Cyli y Spiral.
- Premios
- 7 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
My kids are addicted to this cartoon and it is absolute torture for my husband and I. I love certain cartoons (Adventure Time, Regular Show) and I find others to be pleasant tolerances (Ninja Turtles, Mystery Incorporated, Star Wars Rebels). But this cartoon makes me cringe every time it is on.
Pacman and the Ghostly Adventures centers on the daily struggle between Pac World and the lame, unfunny, annoyingly voiced ghosts from the netherworld. In fact, on the topic of voices, every voice in this cartoon is like nails on a chalkboard.
I understand that this cartoon is aimed at 7-9 old kids, but why on earth is the writing so, so terrible and preschoolish? I feel like my kids are tuned into Disney Jr., which is aimed at preschool aged kiddos. There is potential in terms of interesting story arches, but the writers entirely miss the mark. Pacman lost his parents shortly after a massive civil war that happened on Pacworld, the entire division of Pacpeople and ghosts is a result of the outcome of the war, and there are multiple backstories that are potentially dark and mysterious. The writers barely explore these subplots and it is a shame, because kids can follow sophisticated story lines. Honestly. Oh, the fart, pimple, and burping jokes are nonstop as well. Yay. fun.
Good luck staying sane if your kids run across this tripe. It is painful.
Pacman and the Ghostly Adventures centers on the daily struggle between Pac World and the lame, unfunny, annoyingly voiced ghosts from the netherworld. In fact, on the topic of voices, every voice in this cartoon is like nails on a chalkboard.
I understand that this cartoon is aimed at 7-9 old kids, but why on earth is the writing so, so terrible and preschoolish? I feel like my kids are tuned into Disney Jr., which is aimed at preschool aged kiddos. There is potential in terms of interesting story arches, but the writers entirely miss the mark. Pacman lost his parents shortly after a massive civil war that happened on Pacworld, the entire division of Pacpeople and ghosts is a result of the outcome of the war, and there are multiple backstories that are potentially dark and mysterious. The writers barely explore these subplots and it is a shame, because kids can follow sophisticated story lines. Honestly. Oh, the fart, pimple, and burping jokes are nonstop as well. Yay. fun.
Good luck staying sane if your kids run across this tripe. It is painful.
GHosT CHOMPING AT HIs FeeT Pacs OUR HeRO
PAC JUST CAN'T Be BeAT YeAH HAHAHA
Pac-Man yellow, Pac extreme He's a chowing down machine Ghosts, monsters, ghouls, and only one can stop them
#PacManSweep #GetThemFries.
PAC JUST CAN'T Be BeAT YeAH HAHAHA
Pac-Man yellow, Pac extreme He's a chowing down machine Ghosts, monsters, ghouls, and only one can stop them
#PacManSweep #GetThemFries.
Terribly cheesy voice-acting, cliché villain, horribly written characters, and humor that relies on fart jokes all combine to make this lame show.
Honestly I don't understand that love for this whatsoever and the fact that someone here actually compared it to a masterpiece such as Courage the Cowardly Dog is ridiculous.
Everything apart from the animation is terrible in this show.
It's basically the Sonic Boom for Disney, relying on crap humor, a cliché terribly written plot, and flat characters that they constantly try to add depth to but honestly the characters are irredeemable. The show pretty much relies solely on the edgy teenager cliché for the characters.
Basically everything that's been done in this show was done about 10 years ago but was done far better back then.
Honestly I don't understand that love for this whatsoever and the fact that someone here actually compared it to a masterpiece such as Courage the Cowardly Dog is ridiculous.
Everything apart from the animation is terrible in this show.
It's basically the Sonic Boom for Disney, relying on crap humor, a cliché terribly written plot, and flat characters that they constantly try to add depth to but honestly the characters are irredeemable. The show pretty much relies solely on the edgy teenager cliché for the characters.
Basically everything that's been done in this show was done about 10 years ago but was done far better back then.
I understand the lip syncing, may be bad, and the show relies on character cliche, but focus on the good things about this show, such as:
The voice acting is at least passable.
Some hilarious moments here and there.
The characters aren't always clichéd.
There is also a bit of a great grasp of the source material, particularly Pac-Man eating the ghosts.
The computer animation is decent, although really weird at times.
Some hilarious moments here and there.
The characters aren't always clichéd.
There is also a bit of a great grasp of the source material, particularly Pac-Man eating the ghosts.
The computer animation is decent, although really weird at times.
I grew up watching this. Went back and checked it out semi recently. It's fine. Honestly for how bare bones Pac-Man as a series is (even the world games are pretty basic 3D platformers without much meat in terms of anything you'd derive a narrative from) it's kind of impressive what they did manage to throw together.
The visuals are probably the best part of this. Considering it's 3D animation for a network television show, this could have just looked cheap and bad. But they managed to create a style that's clean enough to avoid that. Backgrounds are simple but they manage to make that the style. It's hard to explain, you'd need to seek out screenshots or scenes to see what I mean. It looks very video gamey. That's a positive. (and funnily enough it got a couple of games.) It's not groundbreaking but I think the artists deserve the praise for managing a very stylistically appealing show.
The writing is where it starts to feel a bit bumpy. This is a kids show, and while I totally agree that just because someone for kids doesn't mean it's ok to be bad, nor am I saying this is entirely bad. It's what it says on the tin. It's a very basic threat of the week show with a sort of overarching mystery that's nebulous enough to serve as a solid enough foundation for weekly hijinks without being a ticking clock problem that would make anyone stressed or annoyed with a lack of narrative progression. (Though the show would never get a chance to wrap this up, with the final episode ending on a... cliffhanger? Sort of.)
The titular pac man's parents were explorers so most episodes have some amount of "my parents might have been here, that's just cause enough for us to go here." Plus "we can also deal with whatever immediate problem not skeletor is causing."
It's a tried and true setup for a show. Love it or hate it. Your mileage will vary. If you're an adult reviewing this in all seriousness then I think you're setting yourself up for failure. This is by no means the worst show on the planet, nor is it a masterpiece. Though shockingly it's probably among the better video game "adaptations" out there. Low bar but hey that's still clearing it. Again there's not a lot to pull from in terms of the greater Pac-Man extended media, so it woulda cleared it anyway. Still...
Though I will say, due to the artstyle and it being a game adaptation, I noticed that more often than not, the episodes felt like levels out of a video game. Sure a kids show having episodes end with a giant monster fight isn't new, but this felt like they tried to make it feel like something out of an actual video game. In fact that happens quite a bit. There's powerups Pac-Man uses that feel like out of a video game (which were adapted to the aforementioned video games this show did get) there's rules and concepts to locations and items that feel like status effects or abilities from a video game. Maybe I was just imposing this onto the show, seeing things that weren't there. But I mean if you're watching a video game show and it starts to feel like a video game, then isn't that a good thing regardless of wether it was intentional?
Characters are simple enough, with the various villains being the highlights, which the showrunners seemingly understood because they're in the show quite often. Walmart brand skeletor is a solid enough villain for what this show is and is probably the best part.
Listen, I don't know how many ways I can say "this show is exactly what you'd think it's gonna be"
It's exactly what you think it's gonna be. If a show about teens written by adults who don't know how teens act for an audience of little kids doesn't seem your fancy then I can't imagine why you'd seek it out.
I think it's charming. At times so bad it's good and others just actually good. Well, good for what it is.
As it is I think it's harmless. Certainly worse kids shows exist. Worse video game adaptations exist.
The visuals are probably the best part of this. Considering it's 3D animation for a network television show, this could have just looked cheap and bad. But they managed to create a style that's clean enough to avoid that. Backgrounds are simple but they manage to make that the style. It's hard to explain, you'd need to seek out screenshots or scenes to see what I mean. It looks very video gamey. That's a positive. (and funnily enough it got a couple of games.) It's not groundbreaking but I think the artists deserve the praise for managing a very stylistically appealing show.
The writing is where it starts to feel a bit bumpy. This is a kids show, and while I totally agree that just because someone for kids doesn't mean it's ok to be bad, nor am I saying this is entirely bad. It's what it says on the tin. It's a very basic threat of the week show with a sort of overarching mystery that's nebulous enough to serve as a solid enough foundation for weekly hijinks without being a ticking clock problem that would make anyone stressed or annoyed with a lack of narrative progression. (Though the show would never get a chance to wrap this up, with the final episode ending on a... cliffhanger? Sort of.)
The titular pac man's parents were explorers so most episodes have some amount of "my parents might have been here, that's just cause enough for us to go here." Plus "we can also deal with whatever immediate problem not skeletor is causing."
It's a tried and true setup for a show. Love it or hate it. Your mileage will vary. If you're an adult reviewing this in all seriousness then I think you're setting yourself up for failure. This is by no means the worst show on the planet, nor is it a masterpiece. Though shockingly it's probably among the better video game "adaptations" out there. Low bar but hey that's still clearing it. Again there's not a lot to pull from in terms of the greater Pac-Man extended media, so it woulda cleared it anyway. Still...
Though I will say, due to the artstyle and it being a game adaptation, I noticed that more often than not, the episodes felt like levels out of a video game. Sure a kids show having episodes end with a giant monster fight isn't new, but this felt like they tried to make it feel like something out of an actual video game. In fact that happens quite a bit. There's powerups Pac-Man uses that feel like out of a video game (which were adapted to the aforementioned video games this show did get) there's rules and concepts to locations and items that feel like status effects or abilities from a video game. Maybe I was just imposing this onto the show, seeing things that weren't there. But I mean if you're watching a video game show and it starts to feel like a video game, then isn't that a good thing regardless of wether it was intentional?
Characters are simple enough, with the various villains being the highlights, which the showrunners seemingly understood because they're in the show quite often. Walmart brand skeletor is a solid enough villain for what this show is and is probably the best part.
Listen, I don't know how many ways I can say "this show is exactly what you'd think it's gonna be"
It's exactly what you think it's gonna be. If a show about teens written by adults who don't know how teens act for an audience of little kids doesn't seem your fancy then I can't imagine why you'd seek it out.
I think it's charming. At times so bad it's good and others just actually good. Well, good for what it is.
As it is I think it's harmless. Certainly worse kids shows exist. Worse video game adaptations exist.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAll of the vehicles are based on fruits and vegetables.
- ErroresIn the first episode, Pac-Man, Cyli, and Spiral must eat berries to protect themselves from exposure to the Netherworld. This makes it clear that the Netherworld harms all Pacworlders equally, yet in the episode "Betrayus Turns Up the Heat" Pac-Man's yellow power allows him to withstand the Netherworld's effects when in theory it should hurt him anyway.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Animated Series Based on Video Games (2015)
- Bandas sonorasPac is Back
Composed by William Anderson (as Will Anderson)
Includes original theme by Toshio Kai
Lyrics by Avi Arad
Performed by Zachary Lobertini
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Pac-Man y las aventuras fantasmales
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución30 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
- 4:3
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Pac-Man y las Aventuras Fantasmales (2013) officially released in India in English?
Responda