Raaghu

Hyped for being a single actor film, it narrates the story of Raaghu (Vijay Raghavendra), a medicine delivery boy masquerading as a thief, robbing the same houses be delivered medicines to in the night. He is blackmailed by an anonymous called into performing several tasks, if he wants to save his girlfriend Jenny. With the second lockdown getting announced, it is upto Raaghu to utilize the empty streets to perform the tasks assigned to him and who is the mysterious caller and why he is after Raaghu, one has to sit through the 90mins thriller to know the answers.

I could say A for the efforts put forth by the team and Vijay Raghavendra in bringing this story to life. The making for the most part is apt and with an able actor like Vijay, the job got much easier to narrate the story. However it is the story that is weak and the major reveals simply lacks impact. As much as they try to elevate the scenes with the nigh setting, the writing lacks the weight. Exactly why, the big reveal don't work and the climax comes out as too weak as well as abrupt. Probably the single actor narrative should've been more confined to a room or a building to leave a bigger impact.

This movie deserves more appreciation for the attempt alone,have seen few solo actor films but Raaghu is top among it,kudoos!! To the Director for the vision! And utilising actor like Vijay raghavendra to the fullest, technically brilliant and definitely watch for thriller lovers..the main difference it has from other solo actor film is that usually solo actor film will he made in a single place but this movie travels at different locations and adding action sequence in a solo actor film a brilliant descition.well I really missed the theatrical experience to have felt the cinematic brilliance on big screen with the crazy background score ! Worth the watch!

This looks like someone's homemade YouTube video, and the level of analysis is no better. In nearly all the cases, all that is shown of the film is the theatrical trailer, which often provides no indication of what makes the film so bad. Early on, we get an exception, with _Mesa of Lost Women_, where the documentarian provides examples of his claims for how bad the film is, but most of the time, we get snide remarks about why the writer perceives the film as bad, without any real demonstration or support, which is certainly difficult if all you can afford to pay for is the trailer. Each film is covered for only about a minute or so, and the segments are broken up with an amateurish computer sequence of thrown popcorn. A coffee table book would be more useful and more fun. This film gets an F.