Sto let tomu vperyod
- 2024
- 2h 21min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.0/10
1.3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Kolya Gerasimov es un tipo corriente: videojuegos, rap y salir con los amigos. Lo último que le preocupa es el futuro. Hasta que un día él mismo entra en el futuro. Y allí no todo es fácil.Kolya Gerasimov es un tipo corriente: videojuegos, rap y salir con los amigos. Lo último que le preocupa es el futuro. Hasta que un día él mismo entra en el futuro. Y allí no todo es fácil.Kolya Gerasimov es un tipo corriente: videojuegos, rap y salir con los amigos. Lo último que le preocupa es el futuro. Hasta que un día él mismo entra en el futuro. Y allí no todo es fácil.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 6 nominaciones en total
Konstantin Khabensky
- Professor Seleznyov
- (as Konstantin Khabenskiy)
Opiniones destacadas
The only problem I had with this is while they tried hard there are still a few moments where the FX should be better.
Other than that everything is quite descent: the acting, the characters, the plot, the sound and visual design.
Going in with no expectations for this particular movie and having an overall low opinion about Russian mainstream movie industry, I was pleasantly entertained and didn't notice how the 2+ hrs ended.
I felel the characters of both main villains are very charismatic, and quite a few of the good guys also were fun to watch, including, but not limited to Kolya and Alisa (and I'm an "original 80's Alisa" fan, so might have been too hostile as well - well I'm not!), I also loved how they left some Easter eggs and connected this piece with other ones from the Universe.
I'm sure there are some plot holes, it's impossible to find a movie without them, but tbh I can't put a finger on'em the way I usually can. Idk, may be I'm just getting stupid or smth.
Anyway, have fun, watch the movie, learn it's message, remember Kir Bulychev, read a book!
Other than that everything is quite descent: the acting, the characters, the plot, the sound and visual design.
Going in with no expectations for this particular movie and having an overall low opinion about Russian mainstream movie industry, I was pleasantly entertained and didn't notice how the 2+ hrs ended.
I felel the characters of both main villains are very charismatic, and quite a few of the good guys also were fun to watch, including, but not limited to Kolya and Alisa (and I'm an "original 80's Alisa" fan, so might have been too hostile as well - well I'm not!), I also loved how they left some Easter eggs and connected this piece with other ones from the Universe.
I'm sure there are some plot holes, it's impossible to find a movie without them, but tbh I can't put a finger on'em the way I usually can. Idk, may be I'm just getting stupid or smth.
Anyway, have fun, watch the movie, learn it's message, remember Kir Bulychev, read a book!
I agree, the description is not very good. The trailers are most likely the same. I don't know, I haven't looked. From the promotional materials, I was familiar with the poster, which is also... And the legendary kalab in Delicious and .
There was an old TV series called Guest from the Future. Pensioners like it, but in fact the product is uninteresting both in childhood and now.
I just saw the opinions, they say the new film adaptation should have been kind of like that back then!!! And as a result, at the beginning of the film they write that the film is only based on some kind of story and is not obliged to follow the original in terms of plot. Probably shouldn't. I haven't read children's fiction.
What about the new film as a result?!
I rarely come across good films made here. To be fair, I rarely watch them. Well, there's a problem with positioning and promotion in general. It doesn't matter how cool your product is. If no one knows about him, then what?! Nothing.
Well, that's it.
Was the movie interesting? Handsome? Yes and yes. It is impossible to describe it even shorter. For such a genre, these are probably the main characteristics. 2 hours and 20 minutes fly by quickly and it's interesting to watch!
No, just imagine. The film cost 1 billion rubles. It seems like a lot, right? And if you convert it into dollars? Well, let's have a ten point margin of error. We keep in mind that it was taken down no one knows when.
Perhaps reviewing or watching for the first time at home, someone will notice that the graphics in places were not straight WOW!!! Well I do not know. It was not noticeable in the cinema. You can see where they got their inspiration from, but the very fact of being able to recreate this and that is amazing.
The plot is certainly weak. If the technical component is pumped from year to year, then the filling ... Is it that important? Well, specifically here we have a teen movie about a beautiful picture and jokes with a wonderful cast, consisting of both well-established people, both talented people and young actors who are still not playing out in places, but we must give chances to young talents...
The bad plot is shorter, we're moving on.
Well, he said about the actors. He said, but not all of them.
Yura Borisov, unfortunately... I'm not happy. The stone plays with 15 minutes of screen time. Sorry...
But Alexander Petrov plays like... He plays some kind of Pokemon, which is sometimes evil, sometimes kind. He plays well. This role suits him, because before that Sasha Petrov played Sasha Petrov in different costumes, But now he is a Cosmo pirate.
How to sum it all up like this?
A cool movie that didn't pay off and became unprofitable.
Here you are, the one who is reading this, go to the cinema. Take the Pushkin map and go. And call your mom and call your mom if you're alive. I was there at the session, Grandma was alone. So you call your grandmother so that she doesn't sit alone.
There was an old TV series called Guest from the Future. Pensioners like it, but in fact the product is uninteresting both in childhood and now.
I just saw the opinions, they say the new film adaptation should have been kind of like that back then!!! And as a result, at the beginning of the film they write that the film is only based on some kind of story and is not obliged to follow the original in terms of plot. Probably shouldn't. I haven't read children's fiction.
What about the new film as a result?!
I rarely come across good films made here. To be fair, I rarely watch them. Well, there's a problem with positioning and promotion in general. It doesn't matter how cool your product is. If no one knows about him, then what?! Nothing.
Well, that's it.
Was the movie interesting? Handsome? Yes and yes. It is impossible to describe it even shorter. For such a genre, these are probably the main characteristics. 2 hours and 20 minutes fly by quickly and it's interesting to watch!
No, just imagine. The film cost 1 billion rubles. It seems like a lot, right? And if you convert it into dollars? Well, let's have a ten point margin of error. We keep in mind that it was taken down no one knows when.
Perhaps reviewing or watching for the first time at home, someone will notice that the graphics in places were not straight WOW!!! Well I do not know. It was not noticeable in the cinema. You can see where they got their inspiration from, but the very fact of being able to recreate this and that is amazing.
The plot is certainly weak. If the technical component is pumped from year to year, then the filling ... Is it that important? Well, specifically here we have a teen movie about a beautiful picture and jokes with a wonderful cast, consisting of both well-established people, both talented people and young actors who are still not playing out in places, but we must give chances to young talents...
The bad plot is shorter, we're moving on.
Well, he said about the actors. He said, but not all of them.
Yura Borisov, unfortunately... I'm not happy. The stone plays with 15 minutes of screen time. Sorry...
But Alexander Petrov plays like... He plays some kind of Pokemon, which is sometimes evil, sometimes kind. He plays well. This role suits him, because before that Sasha Petrov played Sasha Petrov in different costumes, But now he is a Cosmo pirate.
How to sum it all up like this?
A cool movie that didn't pay off and became unprofitable.
Here you are, the one who is reading this, go to the cinema. Take the Pushkin map and go. And call your mom and call your mom if you're alive. I was there at the session, Grandma was alone. So you call your grandmother so that she doesn't sit alone.
Decent start but horrible ending.
This movie after 30 minutes dramatically evolves from a decent film to a confusing, random, mess. The film definitely had potential and a good base since it's based off an old classic which from what I've heard was superb. However the film just tried too hard to stand out, the designs were over the top and so was the story, too much happening all at once is never the key to a masterpiece of a movie. This movie also had moments where the main character had to stop the scene and explain why and how something happened, goes to shows how confusing and utterly stupid and ridiculous this film is. My recommendation is just to watch the old movie.
This movie after 30 minutes dramatically evolves from a decent film to a confusing, random, mess. The film definitely had potential and a good base since it's based off an old classic which from what I've heard was superb. However the film just tried too hard to stand out, the designs were over the top and so was the story, too much happening all at once is never the key to a masterpiece of a movie. This movie also had moments where the main character had to stop the scene and explain why and how something happened, goes to shows how confusing and utterly stupid and ridiculous this film is. My recommendation is just to watch the old movie.
The 2024 adaptation of One Hundred Years Ahead is a pleasant surprise, delivering a large-scale and deeply engaging sci-fi story. Rather than just a retelling of Kir Bulychev's classic novel, this film reimagines the narrative with high-stakes time travel, a battle for the future, and emotionally charged character arcs.
The film's biggest strength is its dynamic, gripping storyline, which evokes the feel of iconic sci-fi classics like Terminator. There's a global conflict, paradoxes that threaten history, and heroes struggling to reshape destiny. The characters are well-developed, especially Alice, whose determination to save her mother and rewrite fate adds emotional weight to the plot.
Visually, the film is impressive-its depiction of the future is detailed, the special effects are top-notch, and the space pirate sequences create a thrilling sense of adventure. The time-travel mechanics are handled effectively, and the shifts between past and future add unpredictability to the story.
If anything, the film could have delved deeper into its secondary characters and the scientific aspects of its world, which were a hallmark of the original novel. However, this doesn't detract from its overall impact.
Ultimately, One Hundred Years Ahead is an outstanding sci-fi film that captivates both longtime fans and new audiences. It's a bold attempt to create a modern Russian sci-fi blockbuster with a powerful message about time, responsibility, and the future.
The film's biggest strength is its dynamic, gripping storyline, which evokes the feel of iconic sci-fi classics like Terminator. There's a global conflict, paradoxes that threaten history, and heroes struggling to reshape destiny. The characters are well-developed, especially Alice, whose determination to save her mother and rewrite fate adds emotional weight to the plot.
Visually, the film is impressive-its depiction of the future is detailed, the special effects are top-notch, and the space pirate sequences create a thrilling sense of adventure. The time-travel mechanics are handled effectively, and the shifts between past and future add unpredictability to the story.
If anything, the film could have delved deeper into its secondary characters and the scientific aspects of its world, which were a hallmark of the original novel. However, this doesn't detract from its overall impact.
Ultimately, One Hundred Years Ahead is an outstanding sci-fi film that captivates both longtime fans and new audiences. It's a bold attempt to create a modern Russian sci-fi blockbuster with a powerful message about time, responsibility, and the future.
This is not doubt movie that has quality (of some sort at least).
It is dynamic enough (even if lots of scenes are elongated with no reason). It has good enough CGI (even if amount of references/borrows is terrible). It has seed of a descent plot (even if it has almost nothing common with original and, for the sake of truth, originals, both film and book, are for 12 yo).
The main problem, as with almost all other modern russian movies, is, sadly, complete absence of originality. Both inner and outer.
Balding producers and elderly championnesses of morality/patriotism are desperate (and hopeless) to be on the "same wave" as next generation. It could be funny if it wasn't so profane, tasteless and mediocre. They are trying to create culture but completely do not understand neither what they are doing nor that culture changed dramatically over 50 years. The saddest thing is, they refuse to learn "new reality", even if they declare this new reality almost every day over the past few years.
As a result, this movie is for no one. Attempts to be modern are clumsy and at least five years late. Plot turns to be empty and leads nowhere. Instead of bright and inspiring future footage is filled by teen's foolish showdowns. Picture is colorful and smooth but lacks meaning.
Great example of what happens when artwork is started by free creative spirit and finished by high-rank soviet censors (yes, they still exist).
It is dynamic enough (even if lots of scenes are elongated with no reason). It has good enough CGI (even if amount of references/borrows is terrible). It has seed of a descent plot (even if it has almost nothing common with original and, for the sake of truth, originals, both film and book, are for 12 yo).
The main problem, as with almost all other modern russian movies, is, sadly, complete absence of originality. Both inner and outer.
Balding producers and elderly championnesses of morality/patriotism are desperate (and hopeless) to be on the "same wave" as next generation. It could be funny if it wasn't so profane, tasteless and mediocre. They are trying to create culture but completely do not understand neither what they are doing nor that culture changed dramatically over 50 years. The saddest thing is, they refuse to learn "new reality", even if they declare this new reality almost every day over the past few years.
As a result, this movie is for no one. Attempts to be modern are clumsy and at least five years late. Plot turns to be empty and leads nowhere. Instead of bright and inspiring future footage is filled by teen's foolish showdowns. Picture is colorful and smooth but lacks meaning.
Great example of what happens when artwork is started by free creative spirit and finished by high-rank soviet censors (yes, they still exist).
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMark Eydelshteyn and Yura Borisov also worked together in Anora (2024).
- Créditos curiososThe closing credits say "Dedicated to Kir Bulychev - the man who believed in the future".
- ConexionesReferenced in Kstati: Alexander Petrov, Mark Eydelshteyn and Dasha Vereshchagina/W24 (2024)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Guest from the Future
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- RUR 900,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 20,115,888
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 21 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for Sto let tomu vperyod (2024)?
Responda