CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.0/10
1.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Cole y Maya intentan sobrevivir en un mundo en el que la población humana ha sido diezmada por los ataques de una nave espacial extraterrestre.Cole y Maya intentan sobrevivir en un mundo en el que la población humana ha sido diezmada por los ataques de una nave espacial extraterrestre.Cole y Maya intentan sobrevivir en un mundo en el que la población humana ha sido diezmada por los ataques de una nave espacial extraterrestre.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
It has to be near-impossible to have the job of writing a one- sentence, intriguing byline for a movie like this that also doesn't spoil the story line.
Then people go to the movie expecting Transformers VII and get a fascinating, beautifully character-oriented film like this and are either 1) angry because they're action / explosion fans or 2) upset because they had different expectations - even if they end up liking the film.
If they marketed it as a relationship film, people who went for Sleepless in Seattle would be angry about the sci-fi. It's a no-win scenario for this type of script.
I'd have to argue that it's properly billed as sci-fi in that the circumstances create the context for the story to unfold as it does, and they are "sci-fi" circumstances.
In my mind this movie was very similar to Monsters, which was also mis-marketed and was a beautiful character-driven film.
If you liked films like Monsters or Solaris (Clooney) then you'll probably enjoy this film's pace and themes.
Then people go to the movie expecting Transformers VII and get a fascinating, beautifully character-oriented film like this and are either 1) angry because they're action / explosion fans or 2) upset because they had different expectations - even if they end up liking the film.
If they marketed it as a relationship film, people who went for Sleepless in Seattle would be angry about the sci-fi. It's a no-win scenario for this type of script.
I'd have to argue that it's properly billed as sci-fi in that the circumstances create the context for the story to unfold as it does, and they are "sci-fi" circumstances.
In my mind this movie was very similar to Monsters, which was also mis-marketed and was a beautiful character-driven film.
If you liked films like Monsters or Solaris (Clooney) then you'll probably enjoy this film's pace and themes.
Im not sure why this has such bad reviews. It is an intriguing movie filled with thought provoking symbolism. Truly makes you think. the cinematography is great and the acting is top notch, especially for an indie film.
However, do not be expecting this to be an action movie about the survival of the human race during the apocalypse, because it is far from it. It is more about an emotional struggle of the characters and their current situation.
Would definitely recommend this to others.
It can get a bit confusing towards the end but is still worth the watch. It is full of twists and turns that complexity change your outlook.
However, do not be expecting this to be an action movie about the survival of the human race during the apocalypse, because it is far from it. It is more about an emotional struggle of the characters and their current situation.
Would definitely recommend this to others.
It can get a bit confusing towards the end but is still worth the watch. It is full of twists and turns that complexity change your outlook.
Horrible. Just horrifically bad. HEAVY accents. Barely understandable. The actors were actually pretty good as far as being believable - but they had a PROFOUNDLY bad script / concept etc . . ANYONE who writes a review on here that is positive has profound mental disease - and should seek professional help. PLUS this movie jumps around so much the viewer literally has no idea what is going on 90% of the time. AND the director of the movie could have even had the main character heavily bearded ( it's supposedly an apocalypse and all ) and then very clean shaven for the earlier jump cuts. LEADING the viewer a bit out of the colossal madness of this film. But of course since this movie is so horrifically bad - he/she did not do this basic thing. DO NOT waste your time watching this. And if you are a sci fi fan and you think this has ANY "cool" sci fi stuff in it - it DOES NOT.
Not sci fi ,not anything just an incoherent plot with mediocre acting. You can't get the time back so don't waste it watching junk like this.
The story sets of on a path that for a sci fi fan could be interesting but somehow like many recent film's ends up not relating to the characters or plot or description in any shape or form.
The story sets of on a path that for a sci fi fan could be interesting but somehow like many recent film's ends up not relating to the characters or plot or description in any shape or form.
The movie has some interesting plot concepts, but the actual content is just boring and slow. Several folks really liked it and say they don't understand why the bad reviews, well part of my complaints over the slow and boring plot as how the main couple are just constantly arguing and fighting over mundane and unimportant elements given the fact that the world is ending it just seems extremely unlikely. I would not have wanted to have paid to see this movie.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaEvery time the news is on, the time is always 17:32.
- ConexionesReferences Los Picapiedra (1960)
- Bandas sonorasHail Mary and a Bottle of Gin
Written by Richard Chesebrough & Joseph Baker
Performed by Mo Creasey & Richard Chesebrough
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Beyond?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta