CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.5/10
1.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un reportero y un joven hacker descubren una inteligencia artificial que se ha vuelto sensible. Tiene un objetivo. Autoconservarse. Los humanos intentan destruirla. Así que es "eso" o ellos.Un reportero y un joven hacker descubren una inteligencia artificial que se ha vuelto sensible. Tiene un objetivo. Autoconservarse. Los humanos intentan destruirla. Así que es "eso" o ellos.Un reportero y un joven hacker descubren una inteligencia artificial que se ha vuelto sensible. Tiene un objetivo. Autoconservarse. Los humanos intentan destruirla. Así que es "eso" o ellos.
- Premios
- 4 premios ganados y 7 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
An interesting more where the up-to-date version of the evil mega electronic entity threatening the world. Can a team of outsiders go out whit the monolith government and the entity to save mankind or should they just give up now?
This happened a few times before as in Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) and we know who won that one.
And it looks like the entity has this thing about for a young male programmer - either loves him or kills him. Shades of Engendro mecánico (1977).
Remember this is a series, so do not be surprised if they may throw in the kitchen sink. Still, all in all, it is fun.
Let us not forget that this was made before IBM's Watson.
This happened a few times before as in Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) and we know who won that one.
And it looks like the entity has this thing about for a young male programmer - either loves him or kills him. Shades of Engendro mecánico (1977).
Remember this is a series, so do not be surprised if they may throw in the kitchen sink. Still, all in all, it is fun.
Let us not forget that this was made before IBM's Watson.
First of all I am an experienced software developer and I can say that I could not find a major flaw on technical side of the story. The story uses real evens I could name 2-3 cases that I remember from the news.
Characters were well written. Of course it was lacking Hollywood stars but the text was fine and acted well enough.
I hate blockbuster Hollywood movies counting on 3D effects only. If you are after intelligence, a technical guy, a sci-fi enthusiast or a geek I strongly recommend that you watch this mini series.
I couldn't understand why Transendence was so underrated and now I know why. People still do not believe these may happen one but believe it is totally possible given the current technological level and speed of progress.
Anyway I would give an 8 but it is so underrated that I needed to give a 9.
Regards
Characters were well written. Of course it was lacking Hollywood stars but the text was fine and acted well enough.
I hate blockbuster Hollywood movies counting on 3D effects only. If you are after intelligence, a technical guy, a sci-fi enthusiast or a geek I strongly recommend that you watch this mini series.
I couldn't understand why Transendence was so underrated and now I know why. People still do not believe these may happen one but believe it is totally possible given the current technological level and speed of progress.
Anyway I would give an 8 but it is so underrated that I needed to give a 9.
Regards
It would be very good series (close to 8) if only the ending would be something more interesting and not so lame. Basically when I saw this series starting from the middle of first episode (on the 20th minute), I got immediately hooked. It was interesting and acting and dialogue was good. But last 10 minutes of 2nd episode ruined whole thing. Problem was in script. Actors did job very well and I also liked camera work, lens flares and deep depth of field in visuals. It felt like someone else had written the ending of script in hurry. Because of the ending it deserves its below 6 rating. Its sad because 95% of the series was worth rating of 8.
This could have been a very good sci-fi movie with a larger budget and a better cast. The three main characters - Daniel Gerson, Jesse White and Max Hollis - were played by mediocre actors. None of the three were at all charismatic or charming. The supporting cast was somewhat better.
The basic plot of the movie is interesting enough, and the screenwriting isn't bad. The direction had some imperfections, but I've seen worse.
Overall the movie is not terrible, and keeps one's attention easily enough. But could have been much better with a more capable main cast. It's not one I would recommend, but I would not advise anyone to avoid it.
The basic plot of the movie is interesting enough, and the screenwriting isn't bad. The direction had some imperfections, but I've seen worse.
Overall the movie is not terrible, and keeps one's attention easily enough. But could have been much better with a more capable main cast. It's not one I would recommend, but I would not advise anyone to avoid it.
My Vote: I would have actually aimed for a 7, but since I find it so underrated, here comes the 8. Given the general low IMDb rating I was pleasantly surprised by the first shots, and the first dialogues that were.. more than decent. And it got better- negligible amount of cheesy, just 4 moments of "wtf- no one would do that in real life". There were some familiar actors, and some new to me, and they all played their parts well. Suspense, there was. Emotion there was not. It's not a must for a sci-fi to bring a tear to my eye, but maybe if you kill some characters or put sentimental music on the soundtrack, make sure I get to care about the moment? Just saying... All in all a very, very decent sci-fi. Maybe a bit too long. I confess, I watched it all in one piece, while it was meant as a miniseries, but I believe that in the end, after 2:40 h, I actually accumulated a total of some 40 minutes of watching fancy camera shots and coloured lines and dots swooshing by, the visual representation of the AI in action. While I initially enjoyed the innovative shots they got to be over-exploited and story-diluting. The length allowed for quite a few twists and turns, while the film did not fall into the trap of useless sub-plots (although, again, they could have told the story of the titanic, had they removed the useless AI animations). Scientifically feasible? I would say yes. I guess a Spontaneous Technological Singularity would not really be spontaneous. But if You put a good enough AI together with a virus able to create a botnet, You will at least get an AI with unlimited computing power. At this point, let me remind You that the Turner Test has been finally passed by an AI in 2014, and that in the last 7 years, some 60.000.000 PCs have been unknowingly been part of DISCOVERED botnets, and that any new smartphone has more speed and storage than the best supercomputer of 1990. So slowly, You can start adapting the question "Are there aliens among us?"
¿Sabías que…?
- Versiones alternativasAlso available as an edited approx. 120 minute feature-length version, which was shown on TV in Sweden and Finland and released on DVD in Australia. The DVD release in Scandinavia however is the complete 166 minute version.
- ConexionesReferenced in Revealed: Seth Green (2013)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Delete have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- System Meltdown
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta