Guillermo Tell

The story is different and they introduced Arab elements into the Catholic and white Switzerland of the Middle Ages, Switzerland did not give women the right to vote until the 1970s, so women fighting in the Middle Ages in Switzerland, come on. Joan of Arc is exceptional.

21st century Switzerland, which has immigrants from the Muslim world from Asia and Africa, was very different in the Middle Ages and Arab warriors certainly did not fight together alongside Crusaders in Switzerland Here they mixed Robin Hood, William Tell, and Peter Pan and created a new story The clothing and hairstyles do not match the period I liked the Crossbow series better.

I knew nothing about this film going in but sometimes taking a gamble and going in blind can pay off when you find yourself watching a hidden gem. "William Tell" however is just an average watch.

I found the film quite hard to follow because (like in alot of historical dramas) most of the strapping, bearded, heavily armoured warriors look the same, and there's way too many off them to keep up with. This might just be me. But it did have quite a slow pace overall.

There is some decent bloody action (especially toward the end) and alot of breathtaking scenery in the movie. But there are some questionable decisions too. Especially when it comes to some of the cast. With a promising ending for one of the characters not happening. While the ending overall isn't even an ending really.

To all the naysayers sharpening their quills, let's get real: William Tell isn't trying to be Braveheart 2.0 (and thank goodness-no one needs another freedom speech in blue face paint). Instead, this film carves out its own niche with a crossbow and a wink.

Sure, some critics are acting like Tell missed the apple and shot their popcorn instead. But let's give credit where it's due: Claes Bang brings more charisma to the Swiss Alps than Mel Gibson brought to the Scottish Highlands. The villains are deliciously over-the-top-Ben Kingsley could probably glare a mountain goat into submission-and the scenery is so gorgeous you'll want to book a flight to Switzerland (or at least Google it).

Is it perfect? No. But neither is Braveheart (historical accuracy, anyone?). If you're looking for a fun, action-packed legend with a dash of heart and a lot less kilt, William Tell hits the mark. So loosen up, critics-sometimes a movie is just a good time, not a history lesson or a revolution.

Let me know if you want more zingers or specific references!

This could have been such a great movie! The middle ages, Switzerland, a gripping story by Schiller... Where to start I wonder. It was shot by someone who has no clue about the Middle Ages in Europe and the Crusades, even though it was obvious they've spent a lot of money on settings and costumes. So much music and dancing and magic maedieval atmosphere that could have been used - but no. The Swiss scenery was there but again, such a poor camera work. Dull casting and dialogues with no wit or humour. And so many dumb irrationalities - like whispering when talking to a crowd, omg - a big disappointment.

The movie is pretty poor, overall. But that's not what I'm here to flag... by far the most jarring aspect is they've lifted Al Pacino's Peach With Inches speech from Any Given Sunday, in parts practically verbatim, for Tell's rousing the troops before battle. WTF is that all about??

Not even a little bit, a nod to it, huge chunks.

"In any fight, it's the man whose willing to die..."

"You gotta look at the person sitting next to you, look in the eye and ask that person are you willing to die for me..." but delivered in the least inspiring, spine chilling way that it should make Pacino cry himself to sleep.