Un misterioso viajero chantajea a un joven agente de la TSA para que deje pasar un peligroso paquete por el control de seguridad y lo introduzca en un vuelo el día de Navidad.Un misterioso viajero chantajea a un joven agente de la TSA para que deje pasar un peligroso paquete por el control de seguridad y lo introduzca en un vuelo el día de Navidad.Un misterioso viajero chantajea a un joven agente de la TSA para que deje pasar un peligroso paquete por el control de seguridad y lo introduzca en un vuelo el día de Navidad.
- Premios
- 7 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Carry-On' is often likened to 'Die Hard' for its Christmas setting and action-packed plot. The film explores themes of tension, moral dilemmas, and high-stakes scenarios in an airport. Taron Egerton and Jason Bateman receive praise for their performances and chemistry. However, some critics note plot holes, unrealistic elements, and a lack of originality, arguing the film relies on familiar tropes. Despite these issues, many find 'Carry-On' to be an entertaining, fun action thriller.
Opiniones destacadas
I was about to put this in the 5-star or possible 6-star category if you turned your brain off. But then it happened.
This is LAX, one of the busiest airports in the world. This is Christmas Eve, one of the busiest travel days in the world. Why is this important?
This entire movie is based upon ex machina. There are about 20+ situations that depends on perfect coincidence to make this movie works.
Empty bathrooms-check Empty baggage claims-check Empty parking lot-check No security at TSA checkpoint-check TSA agents leaving their posts and no one notices.
No 911 calls, or someone talking to a police-check. Bad guys finding their targets in LAX just by coincidence(9 times).
And biggest grievance. How the solution was done.
This movie is a sad indication that A. I. wrote this story. It is just painful.
This is LAX, one of the busiest airports in the world. This is Christmas Eve, one of the busiest travel days in the world. Why is this important?
This entire movie is based upon ex machina. There are about 20+ situations that depends on perfect coincidence to make this movie works.
Empty bathrooms-check Empty baggage claims-check Empty parking lot-check No security at TSA checkpoint-check TSA agents leaving their posts and no one notices.
No 911 calls, or someone talking to a police-check. Bad guys finding their targets in LAX just by coincidence(9 times).
And biggest grievance. How the solution was done.
This movie is a sad indication that A. I. wrote this story. It is just painful.
Let's be real...does anyone expect a Netflix original to be anything special these days? Not every movie has to stun with its plot and characters, and Carry-On certainly doesn't do that. The crime in this movie is completely and totally unrealistic, but who really cares? I never got the impression that this movie took itself very seriously, especially when you consider Jason Bateman is playing a villain. I generally enjoy action packed thrillers, and the fight/conflict scenes in this movie deserve some more recognition. The fighting choreography was interesting 9especially since this takes place in an airport) and the main characters aren't making stupid decision after stupid decision. Was this a great movie? Absolutely not. But OK movies exist and can still be fun if you're looking for something new to watch.
This movie is clearly riding the tail coats of the Die Hard franchise. Unfortunately, it is hampered by very lazy, unimaginative and unrealistic writing. The characters are taking one stupid decision after another to keep the plot going. The main character undergoes a transformation in two hours that is beyond believable, and doesn't make any sense. Jason Bateman as usual is doing a very decent job, but unfortunately that cannot save the movie. Overall, quite the disappointment.
This is becoming quite a common problem with Netflix movies: big budgets, some very decent actors, mediocre CGI, and absolutely terrible writing.
This is becoming quite a common problem with Netflix movies: big budgets, some very decent actors, mediocre CGI, and absolutely terrible writing.
Okay, so it kept me entertained enough to watch it until the end, however, the ending was very predictable and no twist/shock to make it more interesting. Also, there are some moments where you need to suspend belief as otherwise, you'll be rolling your eyes.
Not sure about the casting for the 'bad guy'- having watched Jason Bateman in other roles, it just didn't sit right with me and the sniper, well, preposterous!
The film is a cross between Die Hard and Phone Booth but doesn't quite pull it off, although, if you haven't nothing else to watch, it's not a bad choice to while away a few hours.
Not sure about the casting for the 'bad guy'- having watched Jason Bateman in other roles, it just didn't sit right with me and the sniper, well, preposterous!
The film is a cross between Die Hard and Phone Booth but doesn't quite pull it off, although, if you haven't nothing else to watch, it's not a bad choice to while away a few hours.
As formulaic a film as you will find. That doesn't mean it's bad. It just means that while this is competently made, it doesn't exhibit an original thought at any point. It's sort of a Die Hard with somewhat of a wimp as the hero. I can't say I've been a big fan of Taron Egerton, our hero here, but his career did seem to take a new and startlingly terrific new direction with Rocketman and the fine mini-series Black Bird, but now there is this?! He does okay here, but it's not the best career move I can think of. Our hero's villain is played by the usually well liked Jason Bateman, but he doesn't fit this role to me and Sofia Carson, speaking of AI, does indeed look like something created by a computer. Danielle Deadwyler does what she's supposed to do well enough, but this is just a paycheck role for someone this talented. Theo Rossi is on the villain's team and stuck in a van wasted for most of the pic, but when he is finally let loose, he is gleefully evil and the most enjoyable of all to watch. The film is as far-fetched as Die Hard, just much lesser thrills, humor and excitement. It does contain some suspense and it is quite watchable and also reminiscent of Die Hard, it all takes place at Christmas!
Banda sonora
Previsualiza la banda sonora aquí y sigue escuchando en Amazon Music.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAfter reading the script, Jason Bateman signed on immediately, relishing the chance to play an intelligent, articulate villain.
- ErroresThere is no way to open the door of a 737 cargo hold from the inside.
- Créditos curiososWhen the end credits start, images of scanned bags show on the screen. The items in the bag are representative of the crew being credited: a typewriter for the writer, a countdown timer for the producer, a final script (and wine) and then money for the executive producers, a camera for the DP, drawing and drafting tools for the production designer, an editing computer console for the editors, a sewing machine and rolls of thread for the costume designer, a CPU fan bank for the visual effects supervisor, a DJ turn table and CDs for the music composer, headphones for the music supervisor, and plastic figurines in boxes for the casting director. Additionally, there are items representative of each character for the actors' credits as well.
- ConexionesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 973: Carry-On (2024)
- Bandas sonorasSanta Claus Is Comin' to Town
Written by J. Fred Coots, Haven Gillespie
Performed by Bruce Springsteen
Courtesy of Columbia Records
By arrangement with Sony Music Entertainment
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Carry-On?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Carry-On
- Locaciones de filmación
- Nueva Orleans, Luisiana, Estados Unidos(As Los Angeles)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 59min(119 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta




