CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.5/10
2.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Woody Woodpecker debe encontrar un nuevo hogar tras ser expulsado del bosque. En el campamento Woo Hoo, cree que ha encontrado un hogar para siempre, pero hay un inspector suelto que quiere ... Leer todoWoody Woodpecker debe encontrar un nuevo hogar tras ser expulsado del bosque. En el campamento Woo Hoo, cree que ha encontrado un hogar para siempre, pero hay un inspector suelto que quiere cerrar el campamento.Woody Woodpecker debe encontrar un nuevo hogar tras ser expulsado del bosque. En el campamento Woo Hoo, cree que ha encontrado un hogar para siempre, pero hay un inspector suelto que quiere cerrar el campamento.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
William Atticus Parker
- Delivery Guy
- (as William Parker)
Ras-Samuel
- Kyler
- (as Ras-Samuel Welda'abzgi)
Opiniones destacadas
This movie is good for kids under 10
I watched this with my son and got me it was excruciating to sit through though I did for my son. It was so predictable and lazy. The animation was super lazy and u can tell the actors were trying to act to nothing visually in their scenes until post production.
The way they made choices with scenes which were perfect in animation but didn't work in reality were just awful. They didn't really even make it a semi continuation from the first one.
In the first one you didn't know if they could understand woody or not. In this one he spoke to people and just caused unnecessary chaos and havoc in a way that seemed like the studio was more under pressure to produce something rather than making things work together and better.
This movie was not anywhere close to the cartoons I remember watching as a kid. Yes woody was a trouble maker but only after he had been disturbed or bothered by the villain.
This movie (in my opinion) was a really bad waste of time and money for the film studio.
The writers were so very lazy this seems like a low scale team (possibly grade school kids) wrote this during the writers strike and were paid in robux or vbucks.
I watched this with my son and got me it was excruciating to sit through though I did for my son. It was so predictable and lazy. The animation was super lazy and u can tell the actors were trying to act to nothing visually in their scenes until post production.
The way they made choices with scenes which were perfect in animation but didn't work in reality were just awful. They didn't really even make it a semi continuation from the first one.
In the first one you didn't know if they could understand woody or not. In this one he spoke to people and just caused unnecessary chaos and havoc in a way that seemed like the studio was more under pressure to produce something rather than making things work together and better.
This movie was not anywhere close to the cartoons I remember watching as a kid. Yes woody was a trouble maker but only after he had been disturbed or bothered by the villain.
This movie (in my opinion) was a really bad waste of time and money for the film studio.
The writers were so very lazy this seems like a low scale team (possibly grade school kids) wrote this during the writers strike and were paid in robux or vbucks.
Only reason I rated it so high is because I'm just happy to have another Woody Woodpecker movie.
The first one (2017) was a joy to watch but this one being a "sequel" to that was an extreme let down. Didn't follow the original story, didn't have any of the original characters which I really wanted to see. Introduced wayy too many new animated characters and they can understand woody?!? No one could understand him in the 1st one (2017) but now they all just magically can?
Really disappointed in this movie, it had the potential to be amazing but had bad and lazy production/directing. Really wish this was a real sequel that kept the story line going from the first movie. This one (2024) would have made more sense as a prequel and a sorry one at that.
The first one (2017) was a joy to watch but this one being a "sequel" to that was an extreme let down. Didn't follow the original story, didn't have any of the original characters which I really wanted to see. Introduced wayy too many new animated characters and they can understand woody?!? No one could understand him in the 1st one (2017) but now they all just magically can?
Really disappointed in this movie, it had the potential to be amazing but had bad and lazy production/directing. Really wish this was a real sequel that kept the story line going from the first movie. This one (2024) would have made more sense as a prequel and a sorry one at that.
The movie was quite average overall. The CGI quality was acceptable, but it didn't particularly stand out. However, the voice castings for the characters were impressive and managed to capture the essence of the original Woody the Woodpecker series.
While some of the jokes missed the mark, it's important to note that the film is primarily targeted at children, but adults can still find entertainment value in it. The storyline was fairly basic and lacked depth, following a predictable and straightforward trajectory. The pacing of the movie was notably brisk from the outset, which may have contributed to the feeling of it being a bit rushed.
In terms of the performances, the actors did reasonably well, although, at times, the acting came across as somewhat overexaggerated. The musical scores were nothing out of the ordinary and did little to elevate the overall viewing experience.
In summary, the movie had a low-budget feel to it, but despite its shortcomings, it still manages to warrant a modest recommendation.
While some of the jokes missed the mark, it's important to note that the film is primarily targeted at children, but adults can still find entertainment value in it. The storyline was fairly basic and lacked depth, following a predictable and straightforward trajectory. The pacing of the movie was notably brisk from the outset, which may have contributed to the feeling of it being a bit rushed.
In terms of the performances, the actors did reasonably well, although, at times, the acting came across as somewhat overexaggerated. The musical scores were nothing out of the ordinary and did little to elevate the overall viewing experience.
In summary, the movie had a low-budget feel to it, but despite its shortcomings, it still manages to warrant a modest recommendation.
My little boy is five, he thinks this movie is great. Which is good for him and me. Unfortunately, this isn't one of those movies that caters for adults too. You will likely only find it funny or entertaining if you are five (or near five).
On a side note, I noticed a couple people voted this movie as a seven. I worry for these people. How are you scaling this stuff? This is why IMDB has to be taken with a pinch of salt these days, since streaming, the scores are not good.
Anyway, this is a movie with woody woodpecker and the chick you used to be hot in 'Weeds'. She's sixty now you know? Still looks pretty good.
Am I at the limt yet? Oh yeah, there now - bye!
Peace.
On a side note, I noticed a couple people voted this movie as a seven. I worry for these people. How are you scaling this stuff? This is why IMDB has to be taken with a pinch of salt these days, since streaming, the scores are not good.
Anyway, this is a movie with woody woodpecker and the chick you used to be hot in 'Weeds'. She's sixty now you know? Still looks pretty good.
Am I at the limt yet? Oh yeah, there now - bye!
Peace.
Woody gets annoyed by a brash social influencer doing a production nearby. He causes havoc and drives him away. For all the destruction, the park banishes him. He finds a new home in Camp Woo Hoo next door. He befriends young camper Maggie. Maggie's mother is camp owner Angie (Mary-Louise Parker). They get into a battle with a rival camp and escaped criminal Buzz Buzzard.
This is a sequel to the 2017 Woody Woodpecker movie. I doubt it's necessary to see the first movie. It's live action with cartoon characters. It looks cheap on the level of Netflix and it's not trying to be more than that. First I don't like the design of Woody. He reminds me of the worst of his animation. It's definitely not the classic cartoons. On the other hand, Buzz looks fine. As for the rest, it's a lot of weak kiddie movie story and forgettable characters. Even Mary-Louise Parker is struggling in this one.
This is a sequel to the 2017 Woody Woodpecker movie. I doubt it's necessary to see the first movie. It's live action with cartoon characters. It looks cheap on the level of Netflix and it's not trying to be more than that. First I don't like the design of Woody. He reminds me of the worst of his animation. It's definitely not the classic cartoons. On the other hand, Buzz looks fine. As for the rest, it's a lot of weak kiddie movie story and forgettable characters. Even Mary-Louise Parker is struggling in this one.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaWhen Woody meets Maggie, he carves and paints a wooden statue of Chilly Willy the Pinguin (1953). Chilly Willy is a character who's shorts ran along with Woody Woodpeckers, on the Woody Woodpecker Show.
- ErroresThere's no mention of why Woody no longer lives in his custom built house by the river that Tommy's dad built for him.
- Créditos curiososEric Bauza (Woody Woodpecker), Kevin Michael Richardson (Buzz Buzzard) and Tom Kenny's (Wally Walrus) names appear during the "main cast" section of the credits, but not the "full cast" section.
- ConexionesFollows El pájaro loco (2017)
- Bandas sonorasI Love This
Performed by Danger Twins
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Woody Woodpecker Goes to Camp?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Woody Woodpecker Goes to Camp
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 15,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 40 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.90:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What was the official certification given to El pájaro loco se va de campamento (2024) in Australia?
Responda