Jappeloup

I rarely like movies about horses, they are either juvenile, have horrid and overused scripts, and pay no attention to details that make actual horsemen/women cringe. I am sure that actual horsemen who knew the rider and his family could pick their story apart but it was realistically portrayed.

This movie was an exception, well done. Great acting, attention to detail, storyline. Beautiful jumping segments.

I can only think of two other horse movies that were not cringe-worthy; Seabiscuit and Phar Lap. Both had technical issues but the quality of the story made up for them.

Directors: Stop inserting canned horse sounds in inappropriate situations. Horses do not nicker and neigh in a starting gate or while racing or in cavalry battles.

Also cut the scenes in horse races out where you can obviously see the jockeys pulling on their reins to let the other horse "win".

I was reluctant to go for the ride. I think movies about great horses cannot make great movies, even if they are very well done they only cater for a limited public: kids if it's mostly a fable, or connoisseurs if it's more of a true story.

Then I am no fan of Guillaume Canet. The lack of depth in his turf plus the fact that he envisioned the Jappeloup story as 'Rocky meets jumpers' really did not appeal to me. And even if I was crazy about jumping I would have had these many reservations.

Now Jappeloup has been cleverly crafted around the choices that rider Pierre Durand had to face, with the central paternal figure played to perfection by Daniel Auteuil. This is enough to tell an emotional story that peaks with every jumping show.

The seminal choice for Durand to leave his lawyer job to live his passion to the full is well timed, but emotion really lies with the father's simple and heartfelt lines. The father then comes on schedule to ease the stress while his son only appears as bland, more obstinate than really passionate about riding, let alone about his horse.

The groom character created as a proxy for the horse-rider relationship is not really interesting. It shaves a narrative challenge off the main character's shoulders, only making him look vain and passive before others - the groom (Lou de Laâge), his father, his wife (Marina Hands) - steer him in the right direction.

In the end, the mere succession of key jumping events starts to be too much, all the more so as the father is no longer there. And maybe the movie lacks Daniel Auteuil to deliver the final word, because in the end there is no sense of a lesson learnt. The journey was emotionally charged but the minute after we arrived it's all gone.

There are few film genres that have a formula as firmly established as the sports drama. This does not specifically reflect on their quality, yet: training, competition, uncertainty, failures, successes, inspiration, personal and professional hardships - one could practically set a clock by the standard. 'Jappeloup' definitely fits into the same mold, and it informs us from the start what to expect by alternately swirling together sports action, big sentimental beats, or maybe a little bit of both. As Clinton Shorter's score dabbles with post-rock airiness amidst its strings, built to pointedly tug on our hearts, the tenor is cemented once and for all. Take all this as you will, but one other facet that's striking is how the picture somewhat struggles with transitions. I don't even mean Richard Marizy's editing, which is quite fine; rather, somewhere between Guillaume Canet's screenplay and Christian Duguay's realization of it, I feel like this has a hard time conveying the passage of time, the development of the titular horse as a competitor, the personal arcs and decision-making of characters, and so on. The result is that the storytelling is shortchanged to some degree, especially unfortunate in light of the constant push and pull of highs and lows, and what seems like particular emphasis of "drama" over "sports." All this is to say that one way or another, it's not a title that could ever be perfect, and it maybe even comes across as the type of fare that, were it an American production, might get labeled as "Oscar bait."

Be all that as it may, however - by golly, it works. 'Jappeloup' knows exactly what type of movie it is, and embraces that tenor for better and for worse. As both actor and especially writer, and with his own experience in showjumping, Canet obviously saw this as a passion project to tell the story of Pierre Durand and Jappeloup, and he did it within the rote guidelines of cinematic tradition. There's also an unmistakable feeling that this was made by an athlete for athletes, as the rules and practices of the sport aren't necessarily elucidated for the layperson (in contrast, check out 2001's 'Lagaan,' by far my personal favorite sports film), but to me that only affirms Canet's bent. And for however much one may him and haw about the details, the fact remains that by and large this is very well done. One arguable advantage of working within a formula is that Canet, Duguay, and all others involved could focus more on getting all those essential beats just right; even if in some cases the feature is a tad too on the nose, I don't think there's much disputing how excellent it is overall. The cast give superb performances across the board, to the point that it's hard to pick favorites. Naturally Canet has the most prominence, but Marina Hands, Duaniel Auteuil, Lou de Laâge, Jacques Higelin, and others all have their time to shine, too, and they invariably make the most of it to achieve the intended emotional impact. The dramatic beats may fit into a discrete pattern, including the climax, but to whatever extent they're tropes, they're also meaningful. The stunts and riding that characterize the sports action are utterly superb, a credit to the equines and their trainers as much as the human performers.

Ronald Plante's cinematography is just as noteworthy as Duguay's direction; on one hand the orchestration of shots and scenes, and on the other, the active photography that accomplishes some especially vivid moments. In the direction, cinematography, and in the production design at large lot of detail was poured into this to immerse viewers in Durand and Jappeloup's world, making it easy to get into the spirit of the sport even if all of its minutiae elude us. And in all other regards the picture is admirably well made. Truthfully, while there are noteworthy issues that place upper limits on the title's success, it's much better than not. Even within a tried and true framework, the strengths of 'Jappeloup' - primarily its storytelling, sports action, and acting - handily outshine subjective faults. There's welcome sincerity to the proceedings that pairs nicely with a viewing experience that's heartfelt, entertaining, and highly satisfying. It may not represent a singular stroke of brilliance, but nor does it reach beyond its grasp. When all is said and done I think this is a movie that's a fine credit to all who participated, and it's gratifying in spotlighting a relatively less well known sports story. You don't necessarily need to go out of your way for it, but if you do have the chance to watch 'Jappeloup,' it's well worth anyone's time.

I've only ever seen one horsey film that was any good, in my opinion as a professional horse person. This was Seabiscuit. (OK, maybe International Velvet was not too bad, in the guilty pleasure type category)

Now I've seen two. Jappeloup is quality. Every care was taken, every attention was given, every bit of love was lavished, on what could have been a run of the mill sporty rags-to-riches script (heavily romanced from the true story of Jappeloup and Pierre Durand), but turned out to be a beautifully filmed, heartwarming, exciting story.

I'm not sure how much more I love it due to the fact that I was watching Jappeloup as a child in France, that I knew all the riders and it reminded me of very good and very nostalgic memories, but you could argue that it would have made me more critical of it - yet I couldn't find any obvious flaws and I found myself on the edge of the seat once or twice (even knowing the outcome as it's history!)

The acting is excellent as you would expect from such a high class bunch of actors; the story itself comes very close to excessive sentimentalism a few times, but never crosses the line. It's handled with delicacy and tact, and they have made the very most of a very predictable tale. The photography is astonishing, beautifully showcasing the french countryside, the pace is leisurely, giving you time to know the characters, the times (accurately depicted, from everybody smoking, drink driving, getting back on the horse no matter how hurt you were etc...all true, young people! - things have changed a lot). Special mention to the soundtrack which is wonderful, and the action scenes, with a car following Guillaume and filming superb and never done before jumping shots

In brief, I highly recommend it to anyone who loves horses. So much of it is very close to home; it really translates the passion, the fears, the doubts, the love, what makes us.

For others, rest assured the film is more than a horse film, it's a solid story a la Rocky filmed in a more subtle way. And you might get to understand what your daughter/friend/cousin sees in those beasts. Certainly I never thought showjumping could be this exciting to watch, and I'm partial to it already! True story films are usually bland, seen one, seen them all, but this is better and worth watching. Set yourselves on Seabiscuit, if you saw it. It's the same type of offering: a well made straightforward people story with a blessedly realistic horse background.

(I just watched it in Bluray since I couldn't get to see it on the big screen, and it's worth it. The quality of the picture and the colours are amazing)

8 out of 10

I loves them too . Twas great to see so many great actors _ not sure why the dark scenes look like negatives on my big tv. But a very predictable movie as such could have been much shorter