La bomba atómica y los derrumbes como el de Fukushima han convertido a la energía nuclear en sinónimo de desastre global. Pero, ¿y si nos equivocamos con la energía nuclear?La bomba atómica y los derrumbes como el de Fukushima han convertido a la energía nuclear en sinónimo de desastre global. Pero, ¿y si nos equivocamos con la energía nuclear?La bomba atómica y los derrumbes como el de Fukushima han convertido a la energía nuclear en sinónimo de desastre global. Pero, ¿y si nos equivocamos con la energía nuclear?
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
- Self - Environmental Activist
- (material de archivo)
- (as Robert Kennedy Jr.)
Amory Lovins
- Self - Environmental Scientist
- (material de archivo)
Jim Inhofe
- Self - Senator, Oklahoma
- (material de archivo)
- (as James Inhofe)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe majority of the film's budget was raised through individual investors, mainly Silicon Valley millionaires.
- Citas
Himself - Environmental Activist: I'm wearing radiation clothing, it shouldn't be necessary.
- ConexionesReferenced in TopTenz: 10 Little Known But Genuinely Disturbing Films About Nukes (2018)
Opinión destacada
Plot
The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?
Cast
Made by Robert Stone, a totally unbias gentleman clearly who also did another similar documentary called Atomic Hope (2022).
Verdict
I becoming rather disillusioned when it comes to documentaries, I miss the days it was just a person doing a documentary film on a subject without bias nor agenda. Now the vast majority of documentaries feel forced, feel like propaganda, feel like they've been bought and paid for by an industry, feel politically motivated! I expected Pandora's Promise to feel the same but it doesn't, not exactly anyway.
Many people are saying this plays out like a commercial for nuclear energy and though I get the logic I'd disagree but it's far from unbiased.
You see it presents itself as featuring those who are pro-nuclear, those anti-nuclear and those on the fence. The trouble is, I don't believe it for a second. They're all pro-nuclear playing the role of people who need convincing that nuclear is good and their ridiculous one sided education is basically the entire documentary.
Does it address the criticisms? Yes, but it does it at such a gloriously skew angle it glosses over it and misdirects the viewer. The thing is amidst the misdirection are lies, and I don't appreciate this. When you resort to lies to get your point across, your point is lost entirely.
Pandora's Promise isn't a propaganda documentary, but it does have an agenda.
Rants
There are various accomplishments that governments and corporations have done involving swaying people into voting/fighting against their best interests such as convincing people in the US they don't want healthcare! That one always astounds me but what the fuel industry has done swaying people in favour of environmentally damaging options and making them hate environmentalists and valid alternatives is incredible!
The Good
Relatively well made
The Bad
Dishonest Agenda laden The dynamic of supposed anti-nuclear gone pro-nuclear is insulting.
The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?
Cast
Made by Robert Stone, a totally unbias gentleman clearly who also did another similar documentary called Atomic Hope (2022).
Verdict
I becoming rather disillusioned when it comes to documentaries, I miss the days it was just a person doing a documentary film on a subject without bias nor agenda. Now the vast majority of documentaries feel forced, feel like propaganda, feel like they've been bought and paid for by an industry, feel politically motivated! I expected Pandora's Promise to feel the same but it doesn't, not exactly anyway.
Many people are saying this plays out like a commercial for nuclear energy and though I get the logic I'd disagree but it's far from unbiased.
You see it presents itself as featuring those who are pro-nuclear, those anti-nuclear and those on the fence. The trouble is, I don't believe it for a second. They're all pro-nuclear playing the role of people who need convincing that nuclear is good and their ridiculous one sided education is basically the entire documentary.
Does it address the criticisms? Yes, but it does it at such a gloriously skew angle it glosses over it and misdirects the viewer. The thing is amidst the misdirection are lies, and I don't appreciate this. When you resort to lies to get your point across, your point is lost entirely.
Pandora's Promise isn't a propaganda documentary, but it does have an agenda.
Rants
There are various accomplishments that governments and corporations have done involving swaying people into voting/fighting against their best interests such as convincing people in the US they don't want healthcare! That one always astounds me but what the fuel industry has done swaying people in favour of environmentally damaging options and making them hate environmentalists and valid alternatives is incredible!
The Good
Relatively well made
The Bad
Dishonest Agenda laden The dynamic of supposed anti-nuclear gone pro-nuclear is insulting.
- Platypuschow
- 2 jun 2024
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 1,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 66,680
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 23,419
- 16 jun 2013
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 66,680
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 27 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Pandora's Promise (2013) officially released in India in English?
Responda