Down the Road

I loved the movie. It was original, fantasylike, and I really liked the music which completed the atmosphere of the missing boy and the mystery. It could make a good series... boys who solve mysteries. The acting of the authors was believable and I enjoyed specially the detective. The movie reminded me a little bit of "Stranger things"and "It " but of course without the bloody stuff. The ending was good as well. I would love to see more from the author. Millions are spent for some movies and they are plain, boring and impossible to watch, yet this movie proves that good stuff come from good story and acting and are not dependant on special effects.

"Down the Road" left much to be desired, presenting a narrative that unfolded at an excruciatingly slow pace. The story lacked the necessary elements to grip the audience and maintain their interest. The pacing, in particular, was a significant detriment, making it difficult to stay engaged.

From start to finish, the plot seemed to drag, with scenes feeling overly prolonged and devoid of any exciting or meaningful developments. The characters lacked depth, and their arcs felt underdeveloped, failing to elicit any emotional investment from the audience.

Moreover, the film's editing could have been vastly improved to streamline the narrative and maintain a sense of momentum. The slow progression of events seemed to overshadow any potential for suspense or excitement, leaving viewers waiting for something substantial to happen.

In terms of storytelling, "Down the Road" could have benefited from injecting a sense of urgency or adding layers to the plot to keep viewers intrigued. Perhaps integrating more compelling subplots or exploring the characters in greater detail could have enriched the overall experience.

While the premise had potential, it unfortunately fell flat in execution. A reevaluation of the pacing, character development, and narrative structure could significantly enhance the film's appeal and resonate more effectively with its audience.

This story is about a missing paper "boy", mysterious woods, and his two friends' quest to find out what happened to him. Let's start out with why are men who look about 35 playing high school seniors? Next, add is dialogue that is really artificial. The "acting", plot and setting are about what you would get if you handed two twelve year olds (with no acting experience) a camera and told them to make up a plot and adlib dialogue on the spot. The end of the movie makes no sense whatsoever. It's as if the kids didn't know what they wanted to happen at the end and just throw two different ideas together. And did I say the acting was really, really bad? Or why they chose to make 35 year old looking men play high schoolers? How about why the main character's mother looked like she was in her mid 70's? This movie might be good for a laugh.

Number one for me: I hate movies with constant piano music, unless it's a musical. It makes zero sense to me. I guess that person playing the piano put money into this movie, for his/her piano to be featured, as the main character. This could have been a much better movie, if it made sense. Unfortunately, I can't say much since it would fall under spoiler. Let just say the director or person who wrote this could have made sense if it had been some fairytale, or a space-time continuum. The movie was convoluted with a "what the heck ending". To be honest, the main character acted like he was high in the sky, but he was not, he was a good kid. As to his best friend, no school I ever attended would have allowed him to keep his face covering, but schools have changed a LOT. Lol.