Opiniones de usuarios

The last BBC Dickens' dramatisation broke "Bleak House" down into half-hour soap-opera size elements for easy digestion and to sort of tie-in with the original publication of the story in instalments, but here the format reverted to the more traditional one-hour episodes shown over three consecutive nights.You pays your money and while I welcomed the 30 minute novelty was happy this time to sit for longer and take in the master's story over a shorter period.

There have been so many previous adaptations that any new production has to offer something different, particularly in the scenes meant to grab the viewer's attention, like Pip's first meeting with Magwich and his first visit to Miss Havisham's mausoleum of a house. Both are done very well, particularly Ray Winstone's Magwich rising from the depths of the marshland to confront the terrified youngster while the set-dressing for Satis House certainly conveys the requisite decay and obsolescence of the dwelling-place of its jilted, cold-hearted owner.

It's really only necessary to film the story here to succeed, so great is the narrative Dickens provides, with his adeptness at furnishing a circular story-line, where nothing and no-one is missed out in the resolution as everyone gets more or less their just desserts. Nevertheless the story-telling is enhanced with excellent performances by its big names, Winstone and Gillian Anderson (who was also in "Bleak House"), although the production is less starry than "Bleak House", with only David Suchet as the very correct Jaggers perhaps claiming marquee status. That said the rest of the cast are mostly excellent, playing their well-known characters with aplomb, particularly the portrayals of Pip's shrewish sister, redoubtable Joe Gargery and loyal Herbert Pocket. However I sensed some weakness in the casting of the adult Pip and Estella, the former not imposing enough (in fact I preferred the acting of the young Pip), the latter not glacial or even beautiful enough, but they don't fatally wing the story.

The cinematography is superb, utilising washed-out, almost monochromatic shots to suggest the bleakness of the Dartford Moors and the Thames at the conclusion, while the depiction of the London Gentleman's Clubs as well as the afore-mentioned Satis House are superbly realised. There are many memorable scenes, with Gillian Anderson's inevitable self-immolation perhaps staying longest in the memory. My only other carp would be the occasional "modern" vulgarisation of aspects of the story, for example Drummle's taking Pip to a brothel, as if this wonderful story needs "sexing-up" in some way, which of course it doesn't.

Nevertheless with the promise of a new version of "Edwin Drood" to come, this was a very good and occasionally memorable version of a classic story.

I don't want to go into too much detail or else it will be thoroughly spoiled. I anticipated this adaptation for months, being a great Dickens fan, especially after the BBC's magnificent adaptation of Bleak House.

Similar problems always arise in these adaptations, both suffered from an absence of some key characters (although the latter had more episodes, and didn't suffer as a result) so here as a result the character development is not as it should have been.

I was impressed however by how much of the plot they fit into just 3 episodes over Christmas, and the pace was terrific. There were flaws in the script, where Bleak House took plenty of quotes from the novel, this didn't and therefore doesn't feel as fleshy or ultimately, Dickensian. Why change the best form?

I commend the cinematographers. One really felt the setting as it was written. Now onto the major successes and faults; casting.

Douglas Booth as the protagonist tried but came off as a bit too wooden. He also looked far too attractive (which of course is not an insult) but it didn't really work.

It is nice to see Claire Rushbrook again. Not seen her since Secrets & Lies. She was very convincing as Mrs Joe. Shaun Dooley was excellent as Joe Gargery, as were Harry Lloyd as Herbert Pocket, Jack Roth as Orlick, David Suchet as Jaggers and Ray Winstone definitely brought great life and humanity to the dreaded Magwitch.

My hat though must go off to Gillian Anderson, although many have thought her wrong for the part, let me explain why she was so good and right for the role.

Although Miss Havisham has been typically played as elderly, and her age is never specified really in the book, she was almost married as a teenager, and the time passing would place her in her forties, to early fifties. This makes Anderson, if anything, TOO YOUNG for the role, and the original "best" Martita Hunt, was only some years older. Of course she has been aged by her style of existence. Anderson did look more worn and ethereal as the series progressed. People also seemed to have a problem with her voice.

I see the childish voice as her being trapped in her 18 year old self, which presumably is the age she was jilted, so like the rest of the house, time stopped at that point, which is why she had a similar childish outburst when her relatives visited. I think Anderson's performance therefore is rather genius. One can really feel the angst, anger, regret she feels. I would have preferred a more dramatic apology to Pip in the end, but I suppose it was more subtle. Anderson again impresses in a Dickensian role, showing something completely different to her outstanding portrayal of Lady Dedlock.

It is her impressive work which for me gives this a 7 over 6. Oh and the intro sequence was quite beautiful. Slightly disappointing but overall an engaging adaptation, with a brave effort by Anderson which should really be recognised by BAFTA.

Dooley, Roth, Winstone and Lloyd should all create some buzz too.

Fine work of all of the cast relating a story that has been told so many times, that you cannot expect to feel it fresh and deeply touching, but they do. The journey of young Pip from simple kindhearted boy to knowing, kindhearted man is so capturing that, although knowing the story, I couldn't stop asking myself "what will happen at the end". The richness of the human soul have always captured me and in the this beautiful story you can see it all in one go - betrayal so bitter that makes a heart full of pride so angry and mean as to destroy several lives in a cold, premeditated scheme vexing deeply two young hearts, but mostly its own designer. You will see avarice and ambition of twisted little souls. But mostly you will see kindness - perfect scene in ep1-you will see friendship, honest and lasting, and you will see love, above passion and simplicity. I love Dickens and his way of unfolding his characters, so I was very pleased to see the series keeping close to his book, but in a fresh way suited for the understanding of 21st century audience. I very much recommend!

Outstanding performance of Gillian Anderson.As an ethereal and ghostly Miss Havisham she is still creepy and manipulative.Who would say that "Scully" managed to be such a great actress! Although Douglas Booth is by far much more handsome as Pip would be;his performance is really good.Many critics complained on the actor being such a model!I suppose this is nonsense. Ray winstone is a stupendous Magwitch-all rage and revenge. And Harry Lloyd(who happens to be Dicken's great-great-great-grandson) plays Herbert Pocket exactly as one imagines him to be:the good and always amiable fellow. A great although not perfect(which one is...)adaptation.

While I have read 'Great Expectations' probably about three times in my life and am blown away every single time I do- I find that I have yet to find a film that captures the importance and reverence that the book generates. I understand that film is not suppose to replace the book- but interpret for the screen, it becomes troublesome when certain aspects are not done properly and therefor the story suffers- this occurs in books, just as is does in film. The BBC adaptation is not a disappointment, necessarily, but it lacks in certain areas that cannot be over looked.

I start with what was good- First, the scenery and cinematography was spot on, from the home of childhood Pip, to the streets of London, it was close to what I experience when I read the book. Miss Havisham's home was perfect. It was a ghost of a home, just as she represents a ghost of a woman. There was just enough creepiness and sorrow with a dash of destruction. It may seem silly, but the scene- is almost a character in film- there is a deep impact or lack that can come from how something is represented visually.

Everything from Pip's transformation from blacksmith to gentlemen was well done. Douglas Booth's (Pip) physical appearance did not change, but using clothes, there is a reality to his progression that is necessary to the story and was handled well. I am constantly blown away with regard to BBC Masterpiece Theaters ability to take me to a different place and time so masterfully and 'Expectation' was no different.

Second, Jillian Andreson's Miss Havisham was great. I thought she captured how love is a true destroyer well. When she was in any scene she was the center- she hold the audience with her use of voice and appearance. It was amazing. Shaun Dooley was also very good as Pip's uncle and teacher, Joe Gargery. I thought that he played the 'father figure' well and when he confronted Pip about his behavior and new life-he demanded attention to not only Pip's choices, but as the book captures so well, the deeper themes of social class struggles, family versus money and honesty all took center stage. His performance was a joy to watch. The minor characters, such as Able Magwitch (Ray Winstone), Herbert Pocket (Harry Lloyd) and Jaggers (David Suchet) were also very good and fit nicely into their individual roles.

The bad was really not all that bad for all intensive purposes, but I felt that a few things just brought down the film adaption.

Pip. Oh, Pip. Played by Douglas Booth, who is perfectly wonderful to look at was flat. I never felt the passion that he carried for Estella, which is suppose to be the center of the tale. At its foundation 'Expectations' is a story about love and desire, and I do not think that it was captured here. Since it was clear early on in this adaptation that Estella and Pip encompassed the main theme, it was on the shoulders of Booth to carry the film and he struggled. Perhaps he was too young of a choice to play Pip, while he is close to the actual age of Pip in the book, but he seemed to struggle with how to emphasize his desire, his call for greatness. Booth's performance was not terrible, but it was not great and that was what it needed to be.

The same problem occurred with the female lead, Vanassa Kirby, who played Estella. I understand that she is mean to be a destroyer of men, but she came off as if she was a robot. Seriously, there was nothing to her and that is NOT how she is suppose to be. Ugh, I just do not even want to think about it.

Overall, this adaption was not bad, but it failed where it mattered and left me skeptical of how many more Dicken's classics will be interpreted. Keep the cinematography guys, the music, the costume, the adult actors- but find young actor who can act- not just look the part, but be the beloved character.

Pretty lead actor but totally lacking the literary marvel of Dickensian English. The BBC can't help but dumb down a lot of their recent content to make it more politically correct and attract the Eastenders audience. The behaviour is by and by that of contemporary people in a 19th century setting and as usual it jarrs.

As a Dickens tragic I am well aware that adapting his novels for dramatic performance, whether on stage, TV or on film, will always pose problems, but there have been some triumphant successes. David Lean's being notable, but also the more recent examples: Bleak House -(sublime) and Little Dorrit (brilliant - twice). I have a set of earlier BBC attempts at other Dickens novels on DVD and some of them are toe-curlingly embarrassing - and prove that a good screenwriter is the most important ingredient for success. This production of Great Expectations was good - just. Ray Wintone was born to play Abel Magwitch, and whilst I initially stepped back in amazement at Gillian Anderson's performance as Miss Havisham, I was finally convinced that she was right; her child-like approach fits in with the psychology of a young bride jilted and bitter - excellent. My problems were not particularly with the cast, most of whom were very good, but with the liberties taken with Dicken's plot. The "brothel" scene was unnecessary - why insert "new stuff" when you have left out some old stuff. Much of the dialogue lacked 19th Century authenticity - why tinker about with an aspect of Dicken's writing which has always been seen as one of his greatest strengths? Do the producers think that we are not clever enough to understand? I hope the production of Edwin Drood is better.

The film is a decent adaptation based on Charles Dickens's novel, being very fine directed by Brian Kirk. In the movie there's drama, a love story , emotion, tragedies and results to be pretty enjoyable. The TV miniseries deals with an orphan child called Pip (Douglas Booth) meets on the dark moor an escaped convict hiding out in the Victorian English countryside called Magwitch (Ray Winstone) and helps him. A kindness that will change the course of Pip's life, though he doesn't realize it . Magwitch escapes and is aided by young orphan Pip; then Magwitch discovers a fortune. Later on, at a musty mansion Pip meets an old woman, Miss Havershan (Gillian Armstrong), and a beautiful girl called Stella (once grown-up Vanessa Kirby) who has been raised by the eccentric Miss Havershan. Pit suddenly becomes an elegant gentleman with the support of an unknown benefactor and his advocate. But his enemies would like to get Pip's inheritance for themselves . Meanwhile , Pip befriends Herbert Pocket (Harry Lloyd) and Dolge Orlick (Jack Roth). Everything can change in a heartbeat !.

The miniseries in three episodes is an alright adaptation based on Charles Dickens's novel, being pretty well directed by craftsman director Brian Kirk (The day of Jackal (2023), 21 Bridges (2019), Game of Thrones (2011) and Luther (2010)). In the movie there is dramatic events, romance and betrayals, though I has more style than substance. The images and settings are compelling and really luxurious, though the filmmaker should have learned that beauty on the surface isn't all essential. This is a respectable but sometimes slow-moving recounting about notorious novel, being competently performed, splendidly staged with adequate sets, stunning visuals and interesting drama of a well known story . Brian Kirk's professional retelling of Dickens tone but easily dwarfed by the classic 1946 David Lean's version. Well-acted by all , but especially by Gillian Armstrong's slightly pathetic and mad Miss Havishan decided to wreak havoc on the male gender. Douglas Booth's enjoyable acting as starring, he's romantic , friendly , attractive but also vulnerable and memorable. And David Suchet as lawyer Jaggers is top notch, as well as a large and fine secondary cast, such as Jack Roth, Tom Burke, Paul Rhys, Shaun Dooley, Mark Addy, Harry Lloyd, Charlie Creed-Miles, Susan Lynch, Paul Ritter, Perdita Weeks, Frances Barber. Special mention to Ray Winstone as the unknown benefactor who becomes himself a wealthy man with a big fortune, which he decides to use to make good purports. It contains glamorous as well as colorful cinematography by Florian Hoffmeister. Evocative and sensitive musical score by Natalie Holt and Martin Phipps. Rating : 7/10. Above Average . Well worth seeing for Charles Dickens lovers .

There are many adaptations about this famous novel, they turn out to be the following : ¨Great expectations¨ (1934) by Stuart Walker with Phillips Holmes , Henry Hull , Jane Wyatt , Florence Reed. ¨Great expectations¨ (1946) by David Lean considered to be the greatest version of the Charles Dickens novel with impressive black and white cinematography by Guy Green, starring John Mills, Alec Guinness, Jean Simmons, Finlay Currie, Anthony Wager. ¨Great Expectations¨(1974) by Joseph Harvey with Michael York, Sarah Miles, James Mason. ¨Great Expectations¨ (1998) recent rendition by Alfonso Cuarón with Ethan Hawke as Pit , Gwyneth Paltrow as Stella and Anne Bancroft as Miss Havershan, it is deemed average. ¨Great expectations¨ (2012) by Mike Newell with Ralph Fiennes, Ewen Bremner , Olly Alexander , Sally Hawkes , Holliday Grangier, Jason Fleming. And several TV adaptations and miniseries such as : 1981 with Bratford Jones and John Hickson ; 1987 The untold story with John Stanton , Sigrid Thornton , Anne Louise Lambert , 1989 by Kevin Connor with Anthony Hopkins , Jean Simmons , John Rhys Davies , 1999 by Julian Jarrold with Ioan Gruffudd, Justine Waddell, Charlotte Rampling, Bernard Hill .

Solid production is marred by liberal rewriting of Dickens' novel and miscasting of Gillian Anderson. Shaun Dooley is memorable as Joe Gargery, and Ray Winstone makes a fine Magwitch. Like all other versions, this one doesn't hold a candle to the 1946 classic directed by David Lean.

maybe it is not the best adaptation. but it has the flavor of novel. Douglas Booth is , maybe, a too modern Pip, more interesting as Romeo or Lancelot but almost strange for this role. the good part - Gillian Anderson who is the inspired choice for Lady Havisham and a huge surprise for many viewers. a series who is more than seductive or beautiful. it is not exactly an adaptation but useful support for remember parts from book. that is its basic virtue - a film like a travel. not just extraordinary but special. not only for atmosphere but for a kind of flavor who is not only part of a great cast or script innovations. a film for remember. that could be the definition. beautiful and correct.

A fine production in my opinion of another Dickens classic. Well worth your time.

I don't consider myself as an expert on Charles Dickens' adaptations for the screen, as I recognize it on some other reviewers, but, not knowing other ones, I simply loved this one.

In Portugal we were always flooded with Dickens's tales. We practically grew up on them. And this mini-series is a wonderful document for the new generation of youngsters that don't have patience to read. In fact, I believe that this kind of documents may lead them to search for more tales loke this and look at reading books at a different perspective and see the wonders of it.

This is a masterpiece. The photography is superb and the actors play wonderfully their parts. Even Estella, but I agree that a bit more charm and beauty would better fit Dickens' idea.

I recommend it to everyone.

Despite reading a review that did not give me much hope I went ahead and watched it for the SECOND time. Okay its been reworked a bit and not quite true to the story but the performance is young and very fresh. I particularly enjoyed Gillian Anderson as Miss Haversham what was great was one minute she looked haggard then the next shot in the same scene had her looking stunning.Very effective. The Pip character was just the right amount of smouldering,young sexiness needed, look forward to seeing more of Mr Booth, Estella was so cold and so good,her soon to be husband was a super baddie. Great to see Mr Suchet playing the Lawyer,Orlick was excellent too.Ray Winstone was an added bonus and brought some real originality to this great Dickens story. Loved it, even better the second time around.

I suppose, a noble job, result of good intentions , with some ambition to impress. Not a bad result. Only a seductive story in not , always, proper clothes. But it has the chance to give fair atmosphere and few beautiful to admirable examples of construction of characters.

The mistake - Douglas Booth can be a beautiful Romeo but not the fair Pip. His good intentions are , maybe the main handicap in this sense.

The great good point - Miss Havisham proposed by Gillian anderson. I admitt, Great Expectations is a novel who I love . Miss Havisham is the character who i admire. So, Mrs. Anderson has the inspired art to give new nuances, interesting at whole, to a character who seems so simple to define.

Script, Casting, Direction, Production and performances throughout makes this version of this Dickens classic, for me, the definitive version. The BBC at it's very best, just a glance a look the cast listing and you'll know you're about to experience a quality piece of entertainment.

From start to finish the pace and subtly are faultless, as for notable performances? Well IMO every actor holds there own throughout the three episodes. Please disregard the BBC's later incarnation of this wonderful Dickens masterpiece, there most recent version in 2023, with it's dire casting and a total absence of any kind of sense of soul, was a cynical attempt to milk, and reel in new audiences, it failed miserably. I'll repeat, this 2012 version is all you'll ever need to watch, for the time being that is.

Oscar Kennedy nailed the west country accent, he can play any part seemingly with ease, would love to know his secret?