Opiniones de usuarios

Let's put aside the absurdity of confronting someone breaking into your vehicle in the middle of the woods. Then also put aside the absurdity of your fight or flight instincts kicking in, but they tell you to take Flight after you've already gained the upper hand through Fight. Then put aside the ridiculousness of a thief wildly shooting into the woods because....if you can't see the person you're trying to shoot, the trees will suffice? The foundation for this movie is ridiculous is what I'm getting at.

The internet has been telling us for the last decade that it's actually near impossible to get fully submerged or even die in quicksand if you're a human being with intelligence greater than a 6 year old. This movie asks the question "what's the internet?"

This is your quintessential isolated survivalist thriller in the same vein as Fall, Frozen, The Shallows and the like. Unfortunately, due to a few different things, I don't think it was quite as successful as its predecessors.

Right off the bat, I noticed two things... The picture quality was quite nice and the acting was a little... sus. There were some genuine, real to life moments and interactions with everyone involved while also having some clunky, robotic ones and that aspect persisted throughout the film. I think this was mainly due to some spotty acting and a not super refined script.

As far as the play-by-play goes, I would say these films are some of the hardest to retain your viewers engagement throughout as it is often just a single setting with not all that much to explore or come up with. I think the foundation of what they had as far as action within the "predicament" was there but the pacing slowed down at points throughout and the ending began to drag.

A pretty big issue I had with this one was that there was a lack of consistency within the variables in this world. Sometimes the quicksand and its viscosity looked easy to navigate and sometimes impossible, somethings seemed to effect one person and their health more than it effected the other, at one point an object may seem too far and unattainable and suddenly with a seemingly unhelpful alteration it is now within reach.

I am not a particularly picky reviewer, and am all for letting things go for the sake of entertainment. However, small things such as these and lapses in continuity provide for a heavy does of suspension of disbelief to be enjoyed.

This was by no means an unsuccessful film or entirely unentertaining, but I definitely think it had some major issues that squandered some of the its potential and were detrimental to its success. I think this landed just below average at a 4.5 rounding down to a 4. Would recommend, but not with any fervency.

Sophia and Josh are a couple in the middle of a divorce traveling to Colombia for a work conference. On their free day they decide to do a hiking trip to 'El sendero la chorrera' in the Natural Reserve Park La Chorrera. They're warned about 'las arenas', a dangerous part of the trail made of quicksand and infested by poisonous snakes. But they end up being forced to cross the area and both end trapped in quicksand. With no help, a storm approaching, and snakes surrounding the place Sophia and Josh will have to push their differences aside if they want to survive.

Quicksand follows the well known formula of survival films making it predictable from the start. The story is short, simple to follow and understand without any shocking moment or plot twist. The side plot doesn't add any groundbreaking aspect to the narrative making it unnecessary. The concept of quicksand and snakes is a good and interesting one with the potential of bringing a more emotional story but it turns just decent. Both Carolina Gaitán and Allan Hawco as Sophia and Josh did as much as the direction and scrip allowed them. Portraying a couple in the middle of a divorce with a lot of resentment for each other is the most believable and part of the film. Gaitán and Hawco are able to make their hateful feeling for each other look and feel real and while this is a positive aspect for their initial situation they're supposed to have a moment of reconciliation and that feeling of love and affection never truly arrives. At the end Quicksand turns into another decent horror triller with missed opportunities and wasted potential.

A couple who are going to get divorce soon went for trekking in forest area... But unfortunately they fell down in quicksand and try to survive in it... They found another body in same hole and got rifle and bad as well... And at one stage snake bite them and they suffered more than before... Finally both are escaped from it and get together... Normal survival movie and there is no special in it... One time watchable movie...

A couple who are going to get divorce soon went for trekking in forest area... But unfortunately they fell down in quicksand and try to survive in it... They found another body in same hole and got rifle and bad as well... And at one stage snake bite them and they suffered more than before... Finally both are escaped from it and get together... Normal survival movie and there is no special in it... One time watchable movie...

So I watched this with a friend who had a wisdom tooth removed this week and had a considerably better time during that dentist trip than watching this film.

We absolutely love a rubbish film but this went too far. TOO FAR!

All I could think about was how comfortable they looked standing up in the apparent quicksand, plus why does the woman look stoned all the time, and how much more condescending can the man get?

All in all, an actual genuine waste of time. Which is coming from a lover of terrible films. I dont even have more words but I'm being forced to find some for this review/warning.

Oh yes, a final thought is how are people's faces so clean coming out of that mud? Seriously.

I recently viewed Quicksand (2023) on Shudder, prompted by Jeff's review on Letterboxd. The plot follows a couple, despite their recent decision to divorce, embarking on a trip to meet friends, which includes a hiking excursion. Along the way, they are pursued by a local who attempts to rob them. Fleeing into the woods, they inadvertently stumble into quicksand, leading to a dire situation with only the local wildlife aware of their location...

Directed by Andres Beltran (Bad Days), and starring Carolina Gaitán (Encanto), Allan Hawco (The Breach), and Sebastian Eslava (Herencia).

Quicksand is a well-crafted film in terms of its writing, execution, and unfolding narrative. The performances, particularly by the two main characters, are excellent and authentic. The film's singular setting effectively establishes the tone and atmosphere, as the entire story unfolds within one location. The character dynamics and evolution are engaging, complemented by the minimal but effective elements of horror. The use of wildlife to create tension and horror sequences is commendable. While some of the attack scenes could have been more intense, and a bit more gore might have heightened the experience, overall, it's an entertaining survival film. I would rate this a 5.5/10 and suggest giving it a watch at least once.

I'd say this sunk fast, but even at only 86 minutes, it felt like it was four hours.

All I know about quicksand, I learned from movies and TV shows, mostly during the 70s. It's hardly ever brought up anymore. I mean, I guess if you count Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. And no one really counts that.

This was just plain dumb with LARGE melodramatic chunks, unnecessary slo-mo, poorly paced, really odd choices in acting and life-threatening twists that abruptly end without conclusion. Admittedly, there were tense moments, but again, they fizzle fast and back to more Hallmark/Lifetime scenes.

A really annoying couple are breaking up since this had to keep with the standard Man v Nature Movie Tropes. After what feels like an eternity, they land right into the Title Card and if you've seen Open Water, that's how this mostly plays out. Only...this had a much different ending. A hard one to believe, but they had a budget and had to end the movie as the money ran out.

When I was a kid, I was deathly afraid of quicksand because of what I saw on the tele. I've been told, it's nothing like what you see on TV or in movies. So, I just YouTubed how to survive quicksand and...okay, I'll give this movie some realism. But, JUST A LITTLE BIT.

Kinda hard to make an entire movie based on Quicksand and yet, they've done more with less. Open Water and 127 Hours just to name a couple. I WANTED to like this more, especially with my phobia. Nope.

I'm never ever going to the jungle; I vow and I'm gonna let that sink in.

***

Final Thoughts: Funny, the quicksand scene I remember most from any media was The Incredibly Hulk when David got stuck and was sinking until a blind chick tried to save him. Not before he freaked/hulked out, naturally. It's been an eternity since I saw that clip, but I suspect Hulk's anger would've made him sink even faster. Spoiler, he lives. Imagine if THAT'S what ultimately brought the Hulk down. So to speak.

Well, who would have figured that getting stuck in quicksand would be so unfathomably boring?

When I sat down to watch this 2023 thriller from writer Matt Pitts and director Andres Beltran, I had never actually heard about the movie. But I will say that the synopsis for the movie was interesting enough. However, I scrolled through some of the reviews here on IMDb, and it wasn't all praise and admiration for the movie.

Yet, I opted to watch "Quicksand" on the account of the taste of the reviewers that I had read differed from mine. But I have to say that writer Matt Pitts put together a very bland and boring script for director Andres Beltran to bring to life on the screen.

I must admit that I never felt that the Sofia (played by Carolina Gaitan) and Josh (played by Allan Hawco) characters were ever in any real danger in the movie. And it seemed like they could just have turned around and easily pulled themselves out of the mire. It just never came off as being a dangerous situation and the wooden acting and cringeworthy dialogue just didn't help to convince me.

The movie has a very small cast ensemble, which means that there was all the more pressure laying on the few performers on the cast list. Sadly, however, they just weren't given any chance to carry the movie, because the script, the dialogue and the character gallery had the appeal of sitting down to watch grass growing. Needless to say that I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in "Quicksand".

I didn't stick around to finish watching the movie, because at the 56 minute marker, I was just bored to tears. And I had even dozed off once throughout the course of those 56 excrutiatingly long minutes. And believe you me, when i say that I am never returning to finish watching the rest of "Quicksand".

My rating of "Quicksand" lands on a two out of ten stars.

I had to stop watching this silly movie at the exact moment the main character hit the car jacker in the head with the piece of wood and fell to the ground. He yelled "Run"!, instead of keeping on hitting him in the head till he was dead..When I heard of the movie quicksand I said oh good. It should have a lot of action and suspense. Nope Not this movie. I found that a lot of the circumstances were very unrealistic for real life. The acting is somewhat forced. The other character actors are barely watchable. Except for 1 or 2 incidents in the movie that were fairly well acted but poor lighting.

Quicksand, a movie directed by Andres Beltran and written by Matt Pitts, claims to be an intense survival drama set in the captivating rainforests of Colombia. However, this trainwreck of a film falls flat on its face, leaving viewers grappling for any redeeming qualities amidst the terrible acting, lackluster dialogue, absence of character connection, and the overwhelming sensation that it was created by a group of high school kids.

From the very start, the abysmal acting sets the tone for what is to come. The lead actors deliver performances so wooden and lifeless that it becomes impossible to empathize with their plight. Their portrayal of a married couple on the brink of divorce lacks any depth or emotional range, making it difficult to care about their survival in the unforgiving jungle. Throughout the film, their expressions remain monotonous, regardless of the perilous situations they find themselves in, making it nearly impossible to take the movie seriously.

To make matters worse, the dialogue in Quicksand is cringe-worthy at best. The writers seem to have a complete lack of understanding of how real people communicate and connect. The lines are forced, clichéd, and often unrealistic, leaving the audience with an awkward sense of detachment from the characters and their supposed emotional journey. The attempts at injecting tension and drama through conversation fall flat, leaving the viewer disinterested and uninvested in the couple's fate.

The lack of chemistry between the characters further exacerbates the movie's problems. Despite the premise of a couple on the verge of divorce being trapped together in a life-threatening situation, there is no genuine emotional connection established between them. Their interactions feel forced and unconvincing, rendering the central conflict of their failing marriage inconsequential to the overall plot. This glaring oversight hampers any potential for the audience to root for their survival or care about their reconciliation.

One of the most glaring issues with Quicksand is its production quality, which is reminiscent of a poorly executed student film. The camera work is shaky and amateurish, making it difficult to focus on the story and often leading to motion sickness for viewers. Furthermore, the special effects are laughably bad, taking away any semblance of realism and making the movie look like it was shot on a shoestring budget. The sound quality is equally subpar, with dialogue often being drowned out by background noise, further adding to the viewer's frustration.

The film's attempts at creating suspense and excitement are feeble at best. Rather than building tension organically through a well-crafted script and direction, Quicksand relies on predictable jump scares and cheap tactics to elicit reactions from the audience. These tactics only serve to highlight the movie's lack of originality and creativity, leaving viewers disappointed and disengaged.

Even the lush and beautiful backdrop of the Colombian rainforest fails to salvage this cinematic disaster. The potential for breathtaking scenery and natural beauty is squandered due to the movie's numerous flaws. Instead of immersing the audience in the awe-inspiring surroundings, the uninspired direction and poor cinematography only serve to reinforce the movie's overall lack of quality.

In conclusion, Quicksand is an utter disappointment from start to finish. With terrible acting, poor dialogue, a complete lack of character connection, and production values that belong in a high school AV club project, this movie misses the mark on all fronts. It fails to deliver on its promise of an enthralling survival drama and instead leaves viewers wondering how such a lackluster film ever made it to the big screen. Save yourself the trouble and steer clear of this forgettable and uninspired mess of a movie.

This movie has every cliché imaginable and is extremely dumb. You would be better off taking your five dollar bill and wadding it up and throwing it in the gutter than spending it on this stupid movie. I want that 1.5 hrs of my life back. The scenery was good and that's about the only positive part of the movie. Boa Constrictors are NOT venomous snakes, so why was the husband suffering from snake bite venom from the same snake that tried to constrict the wife? Either it wasn't a Boa in which case why did it constrict the wife, or it was a boa in which case why was the husband poisoned by its bite? So stupid! In any case, I was rooting for the snake.

The actors were decent and the directing was ok but no matter how good the actors were or the directing the plot of this film along with the screen play are total garbage. I really felt like I wasted my time watching this especially with the dumb ending. I was somewhat surprised how the actors and director were able to pop up this film from being a complete failure but for most of the film these two actors are in swampish type quick sand. I knew before hand that this would be really difficult to do because anyone in that situation would spend their time trying to get out but that wasn't the case because they needed something to fill up the movie time so it was pretty absurd the things they did. I think this movie could have been a lot better if the quicksand was just a quarter of the film. Who is to say the film has to entirely be about quicksand?! Anyhow, I give this film a hard pass and there are many other films that are worth watching like the Sound of Freedom which was amazing!

Bad film.

Honestly bad.

Bad acting (save for one actor who was the Spanish friend, wish he had been in it more, he seemed like the only one who had perhaps had more than high school acting lessons at some point).

Bad script, bad effects.

Horrible.

I was wishing my sofa would turn into quicksand about 20 minutes in so that I would be spared the horror and boredom of watching the rest of this movie.

The entire movie became a laughing stock when the wife decides to use a dead snake to lasso the rock. Not to mention that at some points the "quicksand" literally looks like brown water that they could swim in.

The cover of the DVD gives the impression that this is an exciting movie. It's not.

It's about as exciting as .....quicksand.

It could have been a great movie in the hands of a good director. Because the subject is interesting. There is not 2 meters between life and death and you are sinking right before your eyes. There is nothing to press and get strength from.

But unfortunately the movie could not use this situation. It could have added more scary elements and given more humane reactions. Here we mostly watched the accounting of the couple who were about to break up. The reason for running into the swamp was also very absurd. Also, this swamp was not pulling in. That is also interesting. I have lost one of my legs in the swamp while running through high grass once in my life. It pulled in seconds like a bottomless pit. Thank God my other foot and hands were on solid ground. That is why the movie is quite far from convincing. The acting is also very amateur.

There is no sexuality or nudity in the movie.

Tedious film, most of it with handheld camera and closeups attempting to pierce the faces of its two main characters. The couple are put in an un-enviable situation, and it seems the director and writer are fond of videos games that have numerous hurdles and obstacles that keep popping out and which they have to overcome, because this is what they do in this movie: Every sort of hurdle, really just any illogical twist/hurdle (including a friend who is trying to reach them is trapped in a jail, a snake byte, an attack of ants, you name it) is thrown in to let them stay trapped. Then, suddenly, at the end, the cavalry comes galloping... Silly film, waste of time.

In Quicksand, we are introduced to a couple who have decided to divorce. Despite their decision to separate, they still travel to Colombia to attend a mutual friend's wedding. Naturally, there's significant tension between them, with the wife being especially distant and negative about their relationship. The husband, on the other hand, seems uncertain about their decision to split up. Nevertheless, they both appear to have agreed to move forward with the separation and are now stuck in Colombia, forced to endure each other's company.

Their friend invites them on a hike but is unable to join, leaving the couple to trek alone up the mountain and through the jungle. As the weather shifts, they decide to turn back. Through an event I won't spoil here, they are forced to run through the jungle and ultimately decide to split up. The woman ends up falling into quicksand and, after panicking and foolishly moving around, sinks deeper. Her husband then jumps in after her, and both become trapped in the pit. At this point, the movie still has about an hour of runtime, which is essentially the time they spend stuck in the quicksand.

Making a movie entertaining and engaging when it's set primarily in one location, especially when the characters have limited mobility is no easy feat. This concept worked well for 2010's Frozen, which made the most of its confined setup and has since become a classic. However, Quicksand struggles to maintain that same level of intrigue and suspense. As the cover suggests, the couple is not only threatened by the quicksand but also by a venomous snake and other dangers. Unfortunately, I've read that the snake depicted in the movie is not actually venomous, which highlights some inaccuracies and lazy research from the filmmakers.

The movie tries its best to maintain tension, and the couple's fraught relationship adds some drama, but the story quickly becomes boring and frustrating. As a viewer, you find yourself just waiting for them to either escape or succumb to their predicament. It's also hard to root for the characters due to their toxic relationship and the bumpy introduction to their personalities.

Reviews for this movie are mostly very negative, and while it's certainly not great, I think it's passable and I definetly had more fun watching this than to watch another stereotypical Blumhouse movie about a haunted house. There's nothing particularly outstanding or memorable about Quicksand, but it's watchable, aided by its relatively short runtime. That said, it would have been far more effective as a short film with tighter pacing, better decision-making, and a stronger adherence to logic.