Después de que el mundo esté en ruinas, debido a una plaga provocada por el hombre, se produce una batalla de proporciones literalmente bíblicas entre los sobrevivientes.Después de que el mundo esté en ruinas, debido a una plaga provocada por el hombre, se produce una batalla de proporciones literalmente bíblicas entre los sobrevivientes.Después de que el mundo esté en ruinas, debido a una plaga provocada por el hombre, se produce una batalla de proporciones literalmente bíblicas entre los sobrevivientes.
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Resumen
Reviewers say 'The Stand' adaptation receives mixed reactions. Praise for casting and production values, with standout performances by James Marsden and Alexander Skarsgard. Criticisms include non-linear storytelling and deviations from the novel, causing confusion and disappointing book purists. Some appreciate the modern take, finding the series engaging despite flaws. Themes of good versus evil and the apocalypse receive varied responses, with some feeling the depth and tension are lacking. Overall, it's seen as a decent but imperfect adaptation.
Opiniones destacadas
Why does everyone think they can rewrite King and make it better? I can't think of one time this worked out but they still insist on rewriting King just in case THEIR version is better. It isn't. I'm 15 minutes in on episode one and it's a confused mess. I know the novel well and read both the abridged and unabridged version. There's an ocean of material to work with so if you're tossing it all and making up your own story it's pure ego! And I might say it isn;t a tenth as good. I doubt I'll watch anymore. I'm expending too much energy trying to untangle their mess with my memories of the novels. The original mini series sucked but at least they vaguely followed the story! Why pay a fortune for King rights then rewrite the story??? All they care about is a sellable name, they don;t even want his story, they just want his name and a concept then they'll write their own script that won;t be a tenth as good as if they followed the novel but hey, they got their ego stroked and people will still watch it even if it's incoherent garbage.
I've read a few reviews from Stephen King groupies...and fair enough. The 1994 series had me mesmerized, though I had let it slip from memory. So this was exciting.
Really if life came down to these characters, we are mince. It's so hard to identify with the 'righteous' at times, they seem oblivious to the world they're in. And the 'unclean' are really bland, the depravity is what you'd see going on if the world never went through this 'apocalypse' anyway. There is no awe at the Man himself, though he presents as the most watchable character...I don't know if there is enough going on to pique the interest to see it through.
I don't like making comparisons, but I can't help it in this instance. The 1994 miniseries had it's flaws, but at least it stuck to the main themes of the book; the human beings as pawns in a game of good and evil, who they are and become. Only one episode left of the 2020 version and I feel nothing for any of the characters, simply because I don't know them.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
Save yourself time and watch the original or read the book.
Too much flashing around, sideways, forwards, backwards.
Whoopi Goldberg and Alexander Skarsgård are terrible miscasts.
I personally loathe Whoopi Goldberg as an actress. She strikes me as a washed up hippie in every single role. Casting her here as Mother Abagail she lacks the necessary motherly qualities for the role and comes across as... a washed up hippie. She looks the role but it isn't her.
Alexander Skarsgård meanwhile... he just doesn't have the element for Flagg. He comes across as a boring guy that would be best cast as a ride along cop in a police movie. He's not in the right element here.
Most of the other characters are mostly OK, but not stand outs.
Now split this up into 1hr runtimes. It drags out an already long story longer. Without the elements of continuity due to the flashbacks and such it's less immersive.
Read the book watch the original. Don't waste the time here.
Too much flashing around, sideways, forwards, backwards.
Whoopi Goldberg and Alexander Skarsgård are terrible miscasts.
I personally loathe Whoopi Goldberg as an actress. She strikes me as a washed up hippie in every single role. Casting her here as Mother Abagail she lacks the necessary motherly qualities for the role and comes across as... a washed up hippie. She looks the role but it isn't her.
Alexander Skarsgård meanwhile... he just doesn't have the element for Flagg. He comes across as a boring guy that would be best cast as a ride along cop in a police movie. He's not in the right element here.
Most of the other characters are mostly OK, but not stand outs.
Now split this up into 1hr runtimes. It drags out an already long story longer. Without the elements of continuity due to the flashbacks and such it's less immersive.
Read the book watch the original. Don't waste the time here.
Someone needs to edit this back into chronological order, it serves zero purpose to have it jump around all over the place. Whatever hack writer thought this was a good idea needs to slap himself back into sanity.
That's the only point worth making, everyone else has covered the show.
That's the only point worth making, everyone else has covered the show.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaBryan Cranston: A voice-only appearance as the President of the United States in episode 1, giving an address to the people about the virus. Cranston agreed to the role after being asked by co-creator Benjamin Cavell.
- ErroresWhen Stu is taken to the first military facility in Texas they say it is in Kileen. The name of the city is spelled Killeen.
- ConexionesFeatured in The Cinema Snob: The Stand 2020 (2021)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Протистояння
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 57min
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
- 2.4:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta