The Flaw

"The capitalism in the last thirty years has decreased the standard of living for everyone except at the top."

This was the statement of Louis Hyman, an economic historian. I'm mentioning this statement because it was in respects to the more surprising issue behind the '08 financial collapse. Everyone heard the term "subprime mortgages" and everyone believed that that was the core issue behind the '08 financial collapse. What I never heard was "income inequality" which was mentioned in "The Flaw."

When wages stagnate for the poor and middle class, the only way an economy can keep humming is through borrowing and credit, i.e. Debt. When debt increases so does spending which increases the wealth of the top 10%. Debt can only increase by so much before defaults happen and then it all comes tumbling down. But, as Hyman pointed out, it begins with outrageous income inequality.

Of course, there were a lot of other factors mentioned for the '08 crisis: CDO's (Collateralized Debt Obligations), sector rotation, asset market, and more. This 80 minute documentary was very informative and educational. It's been fourteen years since 2008, but it still seems like only yesterday. Furthermore, the way home prices have skyrocketed in the last decade I can only wonder what will cause them to plummet again, and who/what will be to blame this time. Again it seems like the government is behind the curve on the economy and does too little too late.

Free with Amazon Prime.

So many "documentaries" keep being made about a very simple fact.

Banks lied for their own greed. The "economists" who lied who CAME from the banks lied to keep up the greed. The government who was filled with the economists who came from the banks lied to keep up the greed.

In the end, the public was sold the BS that every house and every "homeowner" was "entitled" to have a house.

The simple fact and instead of making more of these dumb documentaries that can be summed up in one sentence:

If you can't afford a house because you can't afford the mortgage, don't believe the banks that you can.

The stupidity of the mortgage-back crisis was that the banks and the institutions couldn't keep the sham up longer.

People need to take some responsibility for their willingness to believe that they "deserved" a house.

Greenspan and the rest of his ilk are a bunch of crooks.

Economic "theory" is not really a theory when it's based on greed and keeping the banks propped up.

This is Communist propaganda. It omits so many of the actual catalysts for the 2008 collapse.

I would not recommend watching this program. Watch The Big Short instead. Far more accurate and educational.

An extremely interesting look at the problems associated with capitalism in America. This documentary goes hand in hand with Michael Moore's CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY, although there's more of an emphasis on helping the viewer to understand technicalities (whereas Moore focused on showing the human side of the story).

I came out of it with a better grasp of Wall Street, the real estate market, boom and bust and consumer society in general, which is no mean feat. The voice over narration is well judged, the graphs extremely useful and there are no dull bits. The use of old cartoons and film clips adds comedy to a documentary you wouldn't think of as amusing. Recommended.

4 is a generous rating.

This documentary spends too much time on inequity of pay. Frankly, if all pay increases, we don't care if someone else makes more.

The housing index adjusted for inflation from 1890 was interesting.

They pulled out tiny bits of Allen Greenspans congressional inquiry to make him look bad. They used it to cast doubt on capitalism without justifying or explaining what the actual failure was that caused the crisis.

Banks loaned to people who should never have qualified for the loans. Yes. But why!? Banks would never do that because it puts them at risk. Underwriters would never do this if they were free to make their best decisions.

This documentary makes it look like it's the banks who cooked up this idea to lend money to people without verifying income. That's false. Bill Clinton signed law requiring lending without checking. They wanted to NOT DiSCRIMINATE based on INCOME That is just stupid. Banks simply complied and then figured out a way to sell the unvetted loans... risk mitigation. It's exactly what any business would do when the government forces them into business practices that do not make financial sense.

This had a lot of potential to enlighten about the 2008 fall, but it failed. I would not recommend this to my kids or anyone for a big picture of the 2008 banking crisis. It had agenda toward equity instead of focusing on the actual laws and resulting compliance that caused it.