CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.0/10
14 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Dos asesinos adolescentes aceptan lo que creen que será un trabajo rápido y fácil, hasta que un objetivo inesperado les desvía de su plan.Dos asesinos adolescentes aceptan lo que creen que será un trabajo rápido y fácil, hasta que un objetivo inesperado les desvía de su plan.Dos asesinos adolescentes aceptan lo que creen que será un trabajo rápido y fácil, hasta que un objetivo inesperado les desvía de su plan.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Chris Colombo
- Hardware Store Perp
- (as Chris Columbo)
Francesca Chaney
- Doll Hospital Girl
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
this movie has almost it all. it includes friendship, money problem AND killing.. it's not a lame romantic movie, it makes you think and it is beautiful done! you should give it a try. I mean it's about two teenage girls who are not sure what to do with life and they are just trying to get enough money so they can buy some dresses, but when they think that all they have to do is kill someone they're wrong because it's so much more than that... they're about to learn such a big part in life and accepting how things are, try to make the most of the situation. this might not be a movie you'll re-watch but it's really enjoyable and very beautiful done. it's a movie which will leave you not empty, but not full it will leave you thinking.
6uwa
The movie starts with a great promise and packed with action. The idea of using innocence with cruelty is a great one. the cinematography is great too but once the story stays in one place for a long time than it gets a little bit boring. As soon as we learn why Gandolfini wants to die the movie is about good as over however it goes on for another 45 minutes or so.
I think Geoffrey Fletcher missed the point on this one. This could've been an action packed piece with a heart without being boring. It seems that he just didn't know how to achieve that sort of a formula.
However, this movie is not a total waste of time. It still has some interesting moments and good montage. Worth a watch.
I think Geoffrey Fletcher missed the point on this one. This could've been an action packed piece with a heart without being boring. It seems that he just didn't know how to achieve that sort of a formula.
However, this movie is not a total waste of time. It still has some interesting moments and good montage. Worth a watch.
This film tell the story of two young assassins who encounter a difficult situation when they do a job to finance the newest designer dress.
"Violet & Daisy" starts off exciting and very promising, as it successfully plays on the contrast between the angelic and innocent faces of the two leading girls, and they violent nature of what they do. However, the greatness was not sustained, and there is much slack after the intense beginning. The plot just dragged on with a lot of unneeded conversation. Though such scenes are to show their developing ambivalence towards their target, it becomes tiring and irritating. Why can't they just do it already! I think "Violet & Daisy" is an adequate film, and I really enjoy the two leading girls' performances. However, if there is more action thrown in that delays their kill, instead of just talking all the time, it would have been much better.
"Violet & Daisy" starts off exciting and very promising, as it successfully plays on the contrast between the angelic and innocent faces of the two leading girls, and they violent nature of what they do. However, the greatness was not sustained, and there is much slack after the intense beginning. The plot just dragged on with a lot of unneeded conversation. Though such scenes are to show their developing ambivalence towards their target, it becomes tiring and irritating. Why can't they just do it already! I think "Violet & Daisy" is an adequate film, and I really enjoy the two leading girls' performances. However, if there is more action thrown in that delays their kill, instead of just talking all the time, it would have been much better.
Violet (Alexis Bledel) and Daisy (Saoirse Ronan) are two innocent looking hired guns. Daisy just turned 18. They worship style icon Barbie Sunday. Russ (Danny Trejo) has an easy gig for them. The Guy (James Gandolfini) stole from their boss Chet. However the job gets a little more complicated.
Precious screenwriter Geoffrey Fletcher tries to do a Tarantino style assassin movie. He has the central concept of girls with guns. He brings in a Gilmore Girl and the great Saoirse. He has Gandolfini who always has his A game. However he doesn't have the sharp quirky dialog or any new inventive style. This is rather bland. Despite all the great pieces, it doesn't add up to anything interesting.
Precious screenwriter Geoffrey Fletcher tries to do a Tarantino style assassin movie. He has the central concept of girls with guns. He brings in a Gilmore Girl and the great Saoirse. He has Gandolfini who always has his A game. However he doesn't have the sharp quirky dialog or any new inventive style. This is rather bland. Despite all the great pieces, it doesn't add up to anything interesting.
Too Cute by Two, this is Another in the Girls with Guns Subgenre that can be Entertaining like Hana (2011) and Kick-Ass (2010). It also Borrows Heavily from that Tarantino Sensibility of Colorful Excess and Slightly Removed Ambiance. But there is Little Wit here that makes these Things Joyful Jaunts into Comic-Book Land.
The Movie Looks Good and the Actors All seem to be On but the Story is so Weak and the Dialog so Trite and the Side Characters and Stories are so Uninteresting that the Film comes off as an Idea not Realised and a Script from the Reject Pile that was Dusted Off but Never Polished.
In the End it is Attractive Visually but is not At All as much Fun as it Thinks it is and that is definitive Pretentiousness. The Lollipop Licking and the Bubble-Gum Blowing are more Cringe than Creative and more Obvious than Clever.
It is a Misfire that Overall, it really doesn't Matter because the Film is Shooting Blanks.
The Movie Looks Good and the Actors All seem to be On but the Story is so Weak and the Dialog so Trite and the Side Characters and Stories are so Uninteresting that the Film comes off as an Idea not Realised and a Script from the Reject Pile that was Dusted Off but Never Polished.
In the End it is Attractive Visually but is not At All as much Fun as it Thinks it is and that is definitive Pretentiousness. The Lollipop Licking and the Bubble-Gum Blowing are more Cringe than Creative and more Obvious than Clever.
It is a Misfire that Overall, it really doesn't Matter because the Film is Shooting Blanks.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaCarey Mulligan was originally cast as Violet but opted to do Drive (2011) instead. She was replaced by Alexis Bledel.
- ErroresWhen the girls shoot their guns with their eyes closed, Violet's gun also empties with the slide back, but in the next shot she fires once more, and then again the gun has the slide in the empty position.
- Créditos curiososUnder the main title "Violet & Daisy", it says in small letters: "In Hi-Fi, Color & Spectacular 2-D"
- ConexionesReferences Las pervertidas (1966)
- Bandas sonorasAngel of the Morning
Written by Chip Taylor
Performed by Merrilee Rush & The Turnabouts
Courtesy of Arista Records, Inc.
By arrangement with Sony Music Licensing
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Saoirse Ronan Through the Years
Saoirse Ronan Through the Years
Take a look back at Saoirse Ronan's movie career in photos.
- How long is Violet & Daisy?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 8,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 17,186
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 9,982
- 9 jun 2013
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 108,139
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta