[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Atrás
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
Brian Krause and Heather McComb in 2012: Supernova (2009)

Opiniones de usuarios

2012: Supernova

80 opiniones
1/10

Like eating socks.... more chewing doesn't make it taste any better

  • nineveh-4
  • 23 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Avoid at all cost!!!

This movie (if you could even call it so)is probably the most offending one to intelligence.

They don't get more stupid than this.

The whole time I asked myself: "Are they kidding me?!"

Nothing is good in this movie!!! Story, acting, effects, NOTHING! It is a complete waste of time and money.

People who made this will never get another cent for any more projects in the future, because they have proved them unworthy of it. No, they should be prosecuted for stupefying effects on people!

GIVE ME BACK MY 90 MINUTES!!!
  • nmkostic
  • 25 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

0/10

Shitting myself is more fun that watching this movie.

10 lines to comment - are you kidding me?

It will be almost as long as longest version of this movie plot.

Don't watch this Do yourself a favor... its slow, boring, bad acting, not logical plot at all actually there ain't nothing good to say about this movie

In my humble opinion it is total crap - I'm sorry but its true... People who worked on it to make this movie

Im sorry but if you watch it yourself then you see its worst B rate movie ever...
  • Blitzkrieg-6
  • 26 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente

Do yourself a favor... DO NOT watch this!

I know that the minimum for a comment is 10 lines but I'll have to work hard to come up with them for such a pile of crap. This is an insult to the intelligence of anyone older than 10 years. It makes your garden variety B movie look like an Oscar candidate. I guess in a Saturday afternoon, after a few 6-packers some guys just thought:

"-Hey, we should make a sci-fi movie.

-Wow, that's great! Let's do it!

-OK, but how do we do it? We'll need a script, and actors and special effects and a lot of other things.

-Never mind, we'll just wing it. We'll rent a warehouse and call it the secret base, a bunch of weird looking guys and call them scientists and that's pretty much it. Oh yes, we'll show a stream of rocks traveling through space form thousands of light-years headed towards a single point in the Universe: Earth. And that's pretty much all there is to it. Of course, let's not forget the two chicks who run through all the movie."

So, they went on and made it. The only bad thing was that they never sobered up. So, instead of what it should have been, this pathetic excuse for a movie came up, which turns out to be a horrible rip off of Armageddon. If you're looking for an effective way to kill braincells go and watch this movie. Otherwise run for your life! My thumb is still glued to the fast forward button.
  • adi-cat
  • 24 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Worst movie ever

  • alreay1
  • 25 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

How is it possible for this to exist?

Possibly the worst movie I've ever seen. Don't waste your time with this one period. The acting is unbelievably awful, the fake Russian guy, the mother and daughter, they should be struck off for life for injury to the public and the profession, maybe they should be sued under trades description or something similar!

Who funds this kind of thing and why? When you think about it there must be some kind of scam involved people can't be that dumb. Someone knows it will flop and that's the idea, like betting on something to lose or a tax right off. I don't know and don't really care, but what I do care about is whilst this gets funded and made and waste's our time there is no funding for the wealth of true talent that exists in abundance ignored by those who pretend to care about film and the standard of our entertainment and education.
  • violentauntie
  • 25 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Worst movie in all history and most likely in all future

It was so bad I could not stop watching. And It's not bad so you laugh, just shocked at how bad it is.

Acting is so bad I almost cried. The script is unbelievable bad. This movie is like asking a Creationist to make a movie about the evolution, the writer have no insight in science at all. My 7 years old niece know more about how the world work.

I'd pay money to forget this movie. I mean it, it's that bad. If you like Sci-Fi stay very very far away from this movie.

If you like Armageddon type of movies and don't give a crap about realistic science and think it's fun to see really bad amateur actors and badly cut scenes, you wont be disappointed. The go ahead and have a blast.
  • Henrik-Norberg
  • 23 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Not worth the minimum one star I gave it.

I joined IMDb to give my say on how bad this movie is.

It's too bad the lowest one could rate a film is only one star. There should be a special zero star rating to rate such films as this. This movie is THAT terrible. Whatever plot there is was dull, boring and completely uninteresting (I had to play a game of solitaire to keep myself at least a little entertained!). There's no logic to this at all, the acting is awful and laughable, the CGI is the worst I've ever seen. The science in this film is an insult. The old series of Power Rangers is ten stars on all grounds compared to this.

This movie should be forgotten and never seen again and I have to beg anyone who is considering to see this... DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS MOVIE!

You'll regret it if you do. I know I did.
  • andy_cchrn
  • 12 nov 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

By far one of the worst Movies I have ever seen.

What a waste of precious time. the CGI was hilarious - in a movie that should have CGI as one of its cornerstones of the storytelling ..

and not to mention the acting .. the Russian actor - please have him not put that much into the accent.

in short - one of the worst movie I have seen. no - make it - THE Worst movie I have EVER Seen.

I see now that I need to enter 10 lines of text. how the hell can I fill in 10 lines of text about a crappy movie ?

well, lets say that I would've enjoyed watching a news report about the economy in south east Turkmenistan much more than watching this movie.
  • havitushkey
  • 26 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Give me back my 2 hours!!!! (spoiler alert)

  • dale-carol-m
  • 25 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

So bad it's funny

Let's begin with the positive: It actually has some great scenes, if you don't look at the whole of the film. There's a really cool near accident car stunt, for instance, and some cool space scenes.

But by far the BEST part of this film, is all the comments you'll find yourself saying in reaction the incredibly terrible manuscript.

Here's a couple: "Oh, the world is ending, and the girl is wondering what she'll pack in her beauty bag?" "Now, let's see... The world is ending, and we can't afford a space chase... No matter! Let's have a car chase instead - by the evil Hezbollah!" Now to the negative: It's a terrible film! No need to say more, really. It's so terrible some people might even find it entertaining.
  • kebman
  • 10 nov 2009
  • Enlace permanente
8/10

An average movie

It was an average movie. The special effects were good but the script was really bad. I do not blame actors as they did just what the director told them to. Besides it's really the director who is able to put pieces together to make a complete movie.

Someone has mentioned that there is no oxygen in space therefore there should be no explosions of fire. True then i guess there should be no sound as well since sound requires a medium to travel and there is really no sound in space.

Science fiction doesn't have to be 100% accurate. It was a B category movie so that it. Don't expect it to be a discovery channel documentary.
  • mercede75
  • 28 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
7/10

Science Fiction , Apocalyptic,

  • mollidew
  • 27 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

2012:Supercrap

I will give some credit where it is due, I have seen much worse movies, but that is not saying much. 2012:Supernova is my definition of a terrible movie, with pretty much nothing to recommend or redeem it other than an intriguing concept.

However, this concept is squandered, because the story structure is so disjointed and predictable and the pace is so sluggish. Even worse is the script, which is questionable in scientific logic and laughably bad in one too many parts, and the direction which is so sloppy I questioned whether there actually was any direction. The production values are not much better, the special effects do look really cheap, and the photography and such indicate that this film was made on a low-budget.

I was indifferent to every single one of the characters, that is including the lead character who is too bland to sympathise with his predicament. The Russian was the worst, the character verged on stereotypical and the accent was as fake as the effects. The acting is terrible and none of the actors connected to their characters which is probably a major reason why I didn't care for any of them.

In conclusion, a very, very, very poor movie. 1/10 Bethany Cox
  • TheLittleSongbird
  • 1 jun 2011
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

not worth watching - not even for 5 minutes

there is nothing positive to tell about this movie. Acting horrible - Story? "A scientist tries to save the Earth from the deadly blast of a star gone supernova." where are all the scientists, NASA experts, military, politicians, the president? One scientist is trying to save the Earth with the help of a Chinese woman (who obviously did not grow in China) and a half drunk Russian. Some poor Russian accent and a glass of vodka doesn't make a convincing Russian. Well yes there is a story, but it is really painful to see how poorly this story can be put together. Low budget is no excuse. I fell asleep after 30 minutes, don't waste your time and money on this flick.
  • glasblok
  • 27 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Do Not Watch This Movie

  • cassmj
  • 14 jul 2010
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Not really worth watching.

  • zaluya
  • 24 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

what a load of rubbish

i will say sorry up front for my rubbish spelling i have dyslexia. now i thought that this was the 2012 end of the world film. sadly mistaken, this is the worst film ever made. now i normally like all films but this is appalling. first the acting is rubbish. i mean the girl sees meteors failing outside and treats this like its normal. then they randomly go off road get out of there car get chased get into a brand new truck drive 20 feet get out and get chased some more i mean what the hell was the point of that. also the terrorist gun fire, did you notice that it Carry's on after they stop shooting. the Russian is he meant to be a joke or is that just what the director thinks all Russians are like, the accent was appalling and drinking vodka. also there in a room smaller than my bathroom and they are controlling shuttle launches and there are just 4 of them. anyone with a sense of intelligence will not not watch this film. there is so much more i could say about this that was bad but that would the whole plot, script filming of the film. DO NOT WATCH
  • benjaminwooff
  • 9 nov 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

The disaster in this disaster film is the film itself

  • jimdclements
  • 17 dic 2011
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Tired Old Clichés Served Cold

  • sarfarazahmad
  • 6 nov 2009
  • Enlace permanente
5/10

You exaggerate

  • neil-476
  • 14 ago 2010
  • Enlace permanente

Ya ya 10 lines, i can give another 50 may be................

Yes i did watch this movie! It was so much fun to just read all other peoples comments! Priceless!!! Had lot of fun reading. Yes i did watch this movie! It was so much fun to just read all other peoples comments! Priceless!!! Had lot of fun reading. Yes i did watch this movie! It was so much fun to just read all other peoples comments! Priceless!!! Had lot of fun reading. Yes i did watch this movie! It was so much fun to just read all other peoples comments! Priceless!!! Had lot of fun reading. Yes i did watch this movie! It was so much fun to just read all other peoples comments! Priceless!!! Had lot of fun reading. Ya ya 10 lines, i can give another 50 may be................
  • snehakar
  • 20 jul 2011
  • Enlace permanente
8/10

Excellent - well worth seeing.

What a great movie! It reminds me of those 50s B movies where the inside of the spaceship was a desk with a steering wheel attached and a curtain behind it! Fantastic! I thought they didn't make them like that anymore. Terrible dialogue, cheap special effects and laughable plot. Pure entertainment! Kids everywhere will be delighted that with a bit of free software off the internet and Mom's iMac they too could make a laugh-a-minute sci-fi yarn. Hawt chicks run from one tricky situation to another while the hero is saving the world from what looks like an office in an old electricity substation. Get a bucket of chicken wings, a six pack of beer and a few friends who dug Plan 9 From Outer Space. Edward D Wood is smiling down on us. Oh yeah, one criticism... should have been made in black and white, but I guess you can turn that down on your set.
  • register091114
  • 19 dic 2009
  • Enlace permanente
7/10

ALMOST as good as that other commercial !

Starring : Brian Krause,Heather McComb Directed : Anthony Fankhauser This is really well done Science Fiction ! Krause is a classic hero,Kind of like Bruce Willis in Armageddon…That kind of bent. McComb actually gets more to do and goes thru a myriad of emotions and has the audience against and THEN routing for her very next move. The special effects are getting rave reviews,Tiny Juggernaut has seriously stepped up from journeyman techs to " Hey,We have a threat on our hands Big Hollywood !" Knowing there is a bigger budget,But similar film coming to theatres,This is not a 'Mockbuster' to be taken lightly. Throughly entertaining and characters that are allowed to breath with depth…Yes,Depth .
  • guestar57
  • 28 oct 2009
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Waste of time... and patience...

It is truly a waste of time and another big disappointment... The idea is quite original, we had Earth threatened by asteroids, comets, sun, moon, etc., but never by a supernova! It is neither "the worst movie ever", as someone commented or "An average movie" as someone else did... I've seen worse and there's no way this one to be an average one! "Average" means a lot!! I agree with "Low budget is not an excuse"! One should be aware of self strength, no matter is director, writer or producer! If you can't make a decent low budget movie about a supernova kicking the Earth, you should do it about flowers, trees,dogs... Only three scientist working to save the earth and only one of them in mental health, a NASA served by inexistent personnel, long, time-consuming useless dialogs to fill up the scheduled duration and poor, very poor acting from low budget actors. It may be true actors would have performed better with a better screenplay and a decent director! Who knows... Lucky me, I didn't pay to see this! And you shouldn't!
  • Cristiantel
  • 14 nov 2009
  • Enlace permanente

Más de este título

Más para explorar

Visto recientemente

Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
Para Android e iOS
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
  • Ayuda
  • Índice del sitio
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licencia de datos de IMDb
  • Sala de prensa
  • Publicidad
  • Trabaja con nosotros
  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.