CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.3/10
28 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Luego de que una fuerza misteriosa diezmara a la humanidad, surge un peligro aún más siniestro... Esta película ambientada en Barcelona expande el universo de «Bird Box: A ciegas».Luego de que una fuerza misteriosa diezmara a la humanidad, surge un peligro aún más siniestro... Esta película ambientada en Barcelona expande el universo de «Bird Box: A ciegas».Luego de que una fuerza misteriosa diezmara a la humanidad, surge un peligro aún más siniestro... Esta película ambientada en Barcelona expande el universo de «Bird Box: A ciegas».
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
Jorge Asín
- Marcial
- (as Jorge Asin)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
So while this film isn't quite as good as the first, its not a bad follow up from Spain to the 2018 original US film by any stretch.
There are some instances of bad CGI and the story progression to the overall universe was quite minimal and these two factors certainly explain some of the lower reviews by critics and viewers alike, but overall I'd award this film a solid 65.
It does drag on a little and the conclusion was a bit predictable but overall I was satisfied by how they deepened the lore and story with the additions they made. I won't get into spoiler territory here but I liked how they told another story which coincided with the events from the first film and told from another part of the world. I'll certainly be in the circle of people interested to see what the next addition to this franchise will be - I think there's a solid cult classic in the making here.
65/100, would recommend.
There are some instances of bad CGI and the story progression to the overall universe was quite minimal and these two factors certainly explain some of the lower reviews by critics and viewers alike, but overall I'd award this film a solid 65.
It does drag on a little and the conclusion was a bit predictable but overall I was satisfied by how they deepened the lore and story with the additions they made. I won't get into spoiler territory here but I liked how they told another story which coincided with the events from the first film and told from another part of the world. I'll certainly be in the circle of people interested to see what the next addition to this franchise will be - I think there's a solid cult classic in the making here.
65/100, would recommend.
Not sure what I watched or why.
1. There is no one to root for. It is hard to have a movie where there is no one to care about or root for. It removes all the stakes. There is no true protagnoist and you spend the movie watching random characters appear on screen then die.
2. The 'twist' does not help the movie but starts it down the frustrating path.
3. Stupidity. All you need to to to survive is close your eyes, that simple. You could VERY EASILY open your eyes for a split second to see where you are going and close them again. Just because you open your eyes does not mean you have to keep them open, looking around, and do not react when the 'creature' is near. These are experienced survivors yet they are making first day mistakes for no reason at all outside of this being a bad movie.
4. The acting is surprisingly good.
5. The storyline/plot is stupid, not really explained ,with story being borderline criminal.
1. There is no one to root for. It is hard to have a movie where there is no one to care about or root for. It removes all the stakes. There is no true protagnoist and you spend the movie watching random characters appear on screen then die.
2. The 'twist' does not help the movie but starts it down the frustrating path.
3. Stupidity. All you need to to to survive is close your eyes, that simple. You could VERY EASILY open your eyes for a split second to see where you are going and close them again. Just because you open your eyes does not mean you have to keep them open, looking around, and do not react when the 'creature' is near. These are experienced survivors yet they are making first day mistakes for no reason at all outside of this being a bad movie.
4. The acting is surprisingly good.
5. The storyline/plot is stupid, not really explained ,with story being borderline criminal.
The problem with this movie is that it shouldn't be a movie. If this was a show with a proper start (like the first movie), an interesting twist with character development (like the 2nd movie) and a finale (a potential 3rd movie) it would've been a straightup banger. But because it's not a complete story, leaves too much story out and has no proper direction to go in other than the characters in both movies sharing the same goal of reaching a safe location.
Things they could've done to make it better:
What I liked about the movie:
I feel like it had a lot of potential and hype but didn't deliver since both movies were extremely mediocre in the end.
Things they could've done to make it better:
- Made a 12 episode show out of it instead with a start and ending;
- More interesting character progression;
- More backstory;
- More interesting villain(s).
What I liked about the movie:
- Concept is good;
- Lots of suspension;
- Great locations;
- Good videography.
I feel like it had a lot of potential and hype but didn't deliver since both movies were extremely mediocre in the end.
The first movie was insultingly stupid filler, made watchable by Sandy Bullock. But Georgina Campbell is in this one and I thought she might bring something fresh to the screen. I was wrong. It's a basic retread, with all the same logical brain-hurts of the first movie, only brain-hurtier.
Mario Casas, a good actor, plays a boring man who is boring. He is escorting a kid through the post-apocalyptic streetssjc#'gch... sorry, I got bored of typing. You know the plot. It's Plot Number 1 from the Big Book of Plots - a bunch of generic humans stumble through derivative scenes until one of them gets yeeted in a flourish of Adobe After Effects plugins.
Do not expect suspense or horror. The director does not know what these things are. The sci-fi elements are completely ignored, so if you've seen the first one, there's nothing new here.
The score is shockingly bad, ever-present and thematically stagnant throughout the entire runtime. The dual-language Spanish setting could have worked well, but they do absolutely nothing with it.
The whole thing reeks of tax breaks. Somewhere, in a Netflix boardroom, people with expensive habits are very pleased with themselves.
Mario Casas, a good actor, plays a boring man who is boring. He is escorting a kid through the post-apocalyptic streetssjc#'gch... sorry, I got bored of typing. You know the plot. It's Plot Number 1 from the Big Book of Plots - a bunch of generic humans stumble through derivative scenes until one of them gets yeeted in a flourish of Adobe After Effects plugins.
Do not expect suspense or horror. The director does not know what these things are. The sci-fi elements are completely ignored, so if you've seen the first one, there's nothing new here.
The score is shockingly bad, ever-present and thematically stagnant throughout the entire runtime. The dual-language Spanish setting could have worked well, but they do absolutely nothing with it.
The whole thing reeks of tax breaks. Somewhere, in a Netflix boardroom, people with expensive habits are very pleased with themselves.
Never saw the first one before seeing this so I have nothing to compare it to. Unless you count about 100 other similar movies and TV shows. This is a mixture of "see", "A Quiet Place" and a few others. Not very original, which is the first issue with the movie.
The other issues are some of the characters which are not sold so well, acting need some work. The CGi/FX is not good, and I think the music score could have been a lot better to sell several scenes. I also think this is not creepy enough i.e. The directing is not on point.
With those negatives out of the way this is still a decent watch. The Spanish is fairly easy to understand and they speak English in many scenes so language is not an issue. Not that this movie really need you to understand everything language-wise but just so you know. The storyline is interesting enough, and the pacing is great. I think this can get a cult following and I would not be surprised if they do a few more of these, set in other locations.
I give this a generous 6/10, and I think the movie is worth your time, But don't expect anything great.
The other issues are some of the characters which are not sold so well, acting need some work. The CGi/FX is not good, and I think the music score could have been a lot better to sell several scenes. I also think this is not creepy enough i.e. The directing is not on point.
With those negatives out of the way this is still a decent watch. The Spanish is fairly easy to understand and they speak English in many scenes so language is not an issue. Not that this movie really need you to understand everything language-wise but just so you know. The storyline is interesting enough, and the pacing is great. I think this can get a cult following and I would not be surprised if they do a few more of these, set in other locations.
I give this a generous 6/10, and I think the movie is worth your time, But don't expect anything great.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMichelle Jenner (Dr Liliana) also stared as Keila in Berlin, the Netflix Money Heist spin-off series.
- ErroresIt is not necessary to take a cable car to the Montjuic Castle. You can easily get there by several roads and walking paths.
And it is not a remote place at all. They don't say where the main quest starts, but is seems to be somewhere within l'Eixample part of Barcelona. From the farthest point in l'Eixample, to the north, it would be less than a three hour walk to get to the castle.
- ConexionesSpin-off from Bird Box. A ciegas (2018)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Bird Box: Barcelona?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Lồng Chim: Barcelona
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 52 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta