Mumbaikar

Sameer lodaya

The movie is wrongly based and titled as mumbaikar as no instances shown occurs in mumbai

The main content is said to be inspired by some south movie but the title of mumbaikar and the city which is described is absolutely not mumbai..there spirit of mumbai is very high and positive the elements shown like acid attack ,kidnapping,looting,etc happens very less in mumbai ..more of negativity shown rather than good qualities of mumbai..unnecessary connections were developed and showcased

Only Vijay was good in the movie in compare to all big stars

This is not expected from great Santosh sivan.

Mumbaikar review :

Premiering this weekend on JioCinema, Mumbaikar is another South remake attempted by Bollywood. This time, they have picked up Lokesh Kanagaraj's far superior Maanagaram (2017) and made an average Hindi movie out of it. Quite unnecessary I would say, as the original Hindi dub of the Tamil hit is available online!!

Anyway, Mumbaikar marks the Bollywood debut of Tamil star Vijay Sethupathi and it's kinda sad he has chosen this launch which offers him no scope at all. In fact, his character is so underdeveloped that you just can't connect with it. Vikrant Massey is another wasted talent here and you sincerely wish this gentleman chooses better projects... for his own good!! The pretty Tanya Maniktala is the proverbial heroine but trust me, she was much better off in A Suitable Boy (2020).

The plot, revolving around a kidnapping gone wrong, which impacts some dozen odd characters ranging from underworld to a BPO (outsourcing) office, is something up Kanagaraj's sleeve. Director Santosh Sivan falters badly with its Hindi remake, which is a bit surprising looking at his rich experience.

Watch Mumbaikar only if you have nothing else to do this weekend.

Regards, Sumeet Nadkarni.

This was so soulless, and Vijay Sethupathi role did not suit him in Tamil Maanagaram Munishkanth, Nailed that role, being a person who is totally silly and innocent and it did not suit Vijay Sethupathis personality, over a massive soulless movie that should have not been made. Lokesh K's first movie, and impressed the audience with his style of storytelling, and the issue with Mumbaikar is that it was just a copy-paste without the right emotions. As a big fan of Vijay Sethupathis, I just wish his entry to Hindi film should have been with some great role, and not with this role. I think as the rule goes leave the original as original and don't mess with it.

Best Actors doing a Wrong Movie and the Worst Movie ever Played By Good Actor.

No Sense of Making these types of Movies in 2023.

Pure Bakwas Movie I've ever watched.

Most Of Actors are very Popular and Well good in every terms but don't know why they played this kind of Character.

Very worst movie.

Ratings option should be 0.

But 1 is okay for Good Acting.

And for 2 Hours entertainment also Give 1 Rating for very Bad and Passing My time.

Never wanna see this movie ever.

After watched I ask myself why I downloaded it and for what reason.. I can't answer myself so what type of Rating I can provide here.. Sorry.

For me It's worst Movie as per My Opinion.

A simple word short review - by - itsbymayank Mayank Louteriya

Firstly it's a mix of individuals Mumbaikar's story.

All the characters have done a good work.

Director have to be like this, he can work in any genre.

A simple one time watch good movie.

A actual life of Mumbai people with some masala in it.

There is a song but in background that's the best thing I believe because makers didn't want to make movie Lengthy.

Unnecessarily makers didn't make it Lengthy and didn't put anything anytime.

Every part and scene is OK and set there.

If you don't know about the makers of the film just go and search it.

To be honest I Mayank Louteriya - Select films not because of only actors but makers..

Thanks - go watch it once.. Review of Mumbaikar by itsbymayank.