Opiniones de usuarios

Anybody watching the series expecting a realistic portrayal of the lives of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood will be disappointed however those just wanting an enjoyable romp with a good story that is well acted then this is just the thing. The characters were delightfully over the top without coming over as parodies.

The story follows the lives of artists Millais, Rossetti and Hunt along with their fictional friend Fred Walters as they recruit models Lizzie Siddal and Annie Miller and fall in love with them. The other main character is John Ruskin who supports their work.

While we do see some of their art the series was far more interested in their romantic entanglements which means there many sex scenes which means a fair amount of nudity... no strategically positioned sheets here. Another main theme is their quest to gain a patron who will enable them to become established.

From the moment it starts it is clear that this is going to be a romp as the music is as over the top that the story it goes with. Some people might not like this but I found it very jolly and suited to the story. The acting was fine throughout, I especially liked Amy Manson and Jennie Jacques's performances as Lizzie and Annie, I can see why the men in the story were besotted by their characters.

So far I have only seen the first three episodes, but I must say I am hooked big time. I love a good costume drama, especially one based on real life historical people. This one tells the tale of the Pre-Rafaelite Brotherhood, a group of young, talented and influential artists, active in London around 1850. As with most historical dramas, you can argue that the story has been modernized to appeal to what an audience today wants to see, rather than depict a true documentation of actual facts, but I have no problem with that whatsoever. I want my dramas hot, juicy and plot and character driven; as I want my documentaries dry and fact based. As it happens, this show has kept me busy online for several hours, finding out more about these artists and their paintings. So my verdict is: hot, steamy and educational.

Expecting some kind of drama (I had read no reviews), I was puzzled for the first 15 minutes or so. Once I realized it was a farce I found it thoroughly enjoyable. I'm sure it has little to do with the reality of the people, time and place. But I don't really care. The writing is excellent and acting is, too. I've gotten plenty of good laughs out of it.

Yes, well it may not be completely accurate and the writers may have taken certain liberties with the characters and the timelines, but I thoroughly enjoyed this show. It's a fast, funny, witty, sexy romp which doesn't take itself too seriously. The chemistry between the leads is palpable, as is the fact that everyone seems to be having a really good time playing some very interesting characters. I've watched it about three times now over the years and have enjoyed it every time. It's also made me curious to read up more about the PRB and their work. The actual PRB and their circle were, in many ways, extraordinary and occasionally over the top, and their lives were pretty fantastical, so this version really isn't much a stretch - I rather think they would have appreciated the 'inventive spirit' of the show's creators in bringing a contemporary interpretation of their story to the screen, as mentioned in the introduction / disclaimer at the beginning. If you want a staid art history docu-drama, this may not be for you. But if you want a fun, well made, entertaining, modern interpretation of a particular time and place and a group of people whose lives were, at times, stranger than fiction, go for it.

This BBC drama series on the Pre-Raphaelites concentrates on three major artists - Millais, Hunt and Rossetti, and uses a fourth member of the Brotherhood, critic Fred Stephens, as narrator and fall guy. On the whole the drama works well, with a humorous edge designed to illustrate the somewhat chaotic circumstances of the artists' lives. The character of the artists is well differentiated; perhaps understandably, there is not much about the differences in their art. In fact the series concentrates on personal lives rather than art. Plenty is seen of their various women, both literally and in terms of screen time, and those who are averse to lusty sex scenes will need to fast forward sometimes. The stand-out performances are perhaps Tom Hollander as the art critic Ruskin, and Amy Manson as the tragically ill-used Lizzie Siddal. The period settings are well done.

Quite by accident, I stumbled upon Desperate Romantics while looking for something else. It has led me on a journey to learn more of the PRB artists, with whom I was totally unfamiliar. The portrayals of Millais, Hunt and Rosetti, their lives and loves is touching, funny and illuminating, in terms of their struggles for fame and recognition. The Fred Walters character keeps it all together. The casting in DR is perfect. Peter Bowker's writing is great and provides so much humor, along with the more serious struggles. Aidan Turner's reaction to his first sexual encounter with Fannie, a prostitute, is priceless and makes me laugh just thinking of it. Jennie Jacques, in only her second role was perfect as Annie Miller. She clearly showed the dilemma young women faced during this time and her struggle to obtain a better life, if not with Hunt, then with another. Amy Manson, as the beautiful model, Lizzie Siddall, is wonderful in showing sweetness, strength, vulnerability and despair because of her love for Rosetti. Others will point out this is not historically accurate and I'm sure they're right, but I looked at it as pure entertainment, realistic fiction. Daniel Pemberton's music is a delight in setting the mood so well. This is not a series for young children given the amount of nudity, but, if you're looking for a story that will give you strong characters and many laughs, this is a great choice.

Franny Moyle's book "Desperate Romantics", subtitled "The Private Lives of the Pre-Raphaelites", deals less with the art of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood than it does with their changing relationships with one another and their relationships with women. Although it is fairly racy in its style, it is nevertheless a work of non-fiction, so Moyle was obliged to stick to historical fact. Peter Bowker's television series, however, although it is based upon Moyle's book, is heavily fictionalised. It concentrates upon the three main members of the Brotherhood, William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais and Dante Gabriel Rossetti, their associates John Ruskin and William Morris, and the women in their lives. Edward Burne-Jones appears as a relatively minor character, but Ford Madox Brown is omitted altogether.

The main female characters are Ruskin's wife Effie, who later married Millais after a sensational divorce, Rossetti's muse, mistress and later wife Elizabeth Siddall, Hunt's muse, mistress and later fiancée (whom he never married) Annie Miller, Fanny Cornforth, another of Rossetti's models who also became his mistress, and Jane Burden, who married Morris but had an affair with Rossetti, by then a widower. Hunt's model and later wife Fanny Waugh is omitted, as are her sister Edith (whom Hunt married after Fanny's death) and Burne-Jones's model and mistress Maria Zambaco. Ruskin's curious relationship with the teenage Rose la Touche is dealt with in much less depth than it is in Moyle's book. (Perhaps Bowker, although otherwise happy to deal with his subjects' sex lives in some detail, was less happy to explore the controversial possibility that Ruskin may have been a paedophile).

Some of the series' departures from historical fact are relatively minor; the model for Holman Hunt's "The Hireling Shepherd" was not Miller but Emma Watkins. In a scene set in the 1850s we see Millais's notoriously sentimental "Bubbles" which was not painted until 1886. William Morris was quite a small man, not the tall figure depicted here. Others are more fundamental, the most important perhaps being the invention of Fred Walters, an imaginary member of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, although partly based upon the real-life Frederic Stephens. Like Stephens, Fred is a critic and journalist who uses his position to promote the work of the PRB, but he is also depicted as an innocent, idealistic young man, forever falling in love with women, particularly Elizabeth and Annie, who refuse to return his affections. (Annie's analysis is that Fred is "too nice" and that women like a man with something of the rogue about him). Bowker sometimes also follows Moyle into controversial conclusions which are not universally accepted; not all biographers, for example, would agree with her that Elizabeth Siddall's death was a suicide or that Annie Miller and Fanny Cornforth were prostitutes.

The acting is generally of a reasonable standard, the best performances in my view coming from Rafe Spall as Holman Hunt, a man torn between his artistic idealism and his genuine religious beliefs on the one hand and his fiery temper and the earthy, carnal side of his nature on the other, and Amy Manson as Lizzie. Lizzie is sometimes wrongly portrayed as a weak, passive figure, but Amy shows that she was a strong, determined young woman with artistic ambitions of her own. I was less impressed by a pre-Poldark Aidan Turner as Rossetti, played here as a man as carnal as Hunt, if not more so, but lacking Hunt's drive and work ethic, content to idle away his days without doing any significant work and forever depending upon his friends for "tin" (as he called money). Samuel Barnett's Millais contrasts oddly with his two painter colleagues; he emerges as a young man just as innocent as Fred, but with the difference that Effie returns his affections in full.

The series did not always find favour with the critics, although their criticisms tended to concentrate on its historical inaccuracies or on its failure to explain the philosophy of Pre-Raphaelitism or how the movement contrasted with the sort of art which had preceded it. Others took exception to the frequent and explicit sex scenes or to the jarring modern-style music. There is certainly some merit in such criticisms, and yet I couldn't help feeling that if you were looking for a fictional series about a group of free-thinking, free-living and free-loving nineteenth century artists, "Desperate Romantics" is actually quite a good one. 6/10.

Some reviewers are taking things way too seriously. This is a fun, bawdy take on the life and loves of the Pre-Raphaelites. It's certainly not meant to be a piece of art scholarship. You see, there's this genre called historical FICTION. I almost turned it off in the first few minutes because I thought it going to cheesy but am so glad I didn't. It's funny, fast moving, well written, well acted, and infinitely watchable. But why oh why only one season??

I don't watch many period Dramas. I loved Ripper Street but Aiden Turner was the reason I watched( just saw him in Being Human.) Just like in that he ruled the roost with his bold acting. There's just something about him.. Aah. Was it the greatest series, no, but I did enjoy it and lately I turn off about 4 things before I find something I can watch a few episodes but I finished this all last night. People complaining about sex and nudity loook at the "title". The scenes are mostly with Turner and not very graphic. I don't know much about the original brotherhood or their art but they do show quite a bit and much is about art. maybe it's not accurate idc I just wanted to be entertained for a few hours and I was...

It takes a lot of hack-work to make a mess out of the incredibly intriguing and colorful story of the Pre-Raphaelite painters in Victorian England, but boy they managed it here. This is a juvenile, tedious, badly acted and worse-written mess. Evidently to make up for the lack of intelligent script or acting, the BBC threw in as much sex and nudity as possible.

There's no effort to even remotely approach the truth, and we never really see the paintings, which should be the star of the whole series. Everyone agrees that the best thing about the show is the costumes, but that doesn't make for intelligent viewing. I couldn't make it past 45 minutes of the series without getting incredibly bored.

I'm really disappointed lately with the hack-work -- which relies completely on visuals and titillation for its appeal -- that is coming out of the BBC in their period pieces these days. Take me back 5, 10, 15 or more years ago when the BBC was at the height of its period-piece glory. Now it's like everything else -- all show and titillation and lowbrow appeal, no intelligence or thought.

Desperate Romantics is a period drama set in 19th century London. It tells the story of the lives and loves of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. This six episode series is inspired by the non-fiction book "Desperate Romantics: The Private Lives of the Pre-Raphaelites" by Franny Moyle.

The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was founded in 1848 and consisted of a group of English painters, poets and critics. They defined themselves as a reform movement whose purpose was to return to creating art with abundant detail, intense colors and complex compositions. Although the series is inspired by the non-fiction book, this is not a historically accurate account of the artists lives.

The story starts with the brotherhood as hopeful unknown fringe artists and follows them as they become well respected and well compensated artists in demand. While there is little interjected on the actual painting done by the artists, the series main focus is on the personal relationships of the brotherhood. This is drama that does not take itself too seriously. Rather than linger on the tragedies it portrays, it keeps a steady current of passion, enthusiasm and ambition throughout each episode. The members of the brotherhood will stop at nothing to succeed in attaining their desires. They betray each other in small and large ways over and over again, but through it all, they cling to their dysfunctional friendships.

The exuberance of the young hopeful artists on a mission to change the world of art is contagious. As a viewer, I got caught up in the excitement of being on the verge of a revolution. The obvious rebel bad boys of their time, the brotherhood refuse to conduct themselves in a manner fitting polite society. Their personalities are volatile and unpredictable, and the artists are often prone to loud outbursts when they don't get their way. All this makes for interesting television. Relationships are full of passion, anger and urgency. The dialogue is clever. The series moves along at a quick pace and the musical score is a pithy composition that keeps the overall mood light.

Even though the focus is on the male artists, the lead female characters are not one-dimensional. They are strong women with their own ambitions. They stand their ground and refuse to be treated as subservient docile creatures used only for their beauty and companionship.

I thoroughly enjoyed this series. It made living like a starving artist look like a really good time and because of the lasting success of the brotherhood, it also seems like a noble pursuit.

Highly enjoyable show about a small group of artists trying to break the mould

This series had all the appeal of a swift kick to your "most private of places". I felt no joy, nor did I sympathize with any of the main characters; they were all superficial, shallow, and self absorbed. To top it off, the entire narrative was boring and dragged on painfully.

Historical drama with all the gravitas of a Hello spread. Wall-to-wall slebs, lots of period cliche, plenty of dull contrived sex of the above-the-waistline variety. Utterly dreadful, but there'll be a guaranteed audience for this sort of formulaic stuff. It does look like it was expensive to make - it's particularly annoying that this is a BBC production so will have drained public money.

Just too pretentious for its own good. I didn't feel the characters rang true and it had too many cliches thrown in just to try and appeal to everyone. The music didn't fit the feel and pace and the acting was a little smug. The camera work was annoying too with the shots being either too close or too unsteady. I couldn't finish the second episode because at that point I really didn't care for any of it. To sum up, it was just too shallow and lightweight with bad acting, script and direction. If you want to immerse yourself in the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood world don't watch this.