Opiniones de usuarios

Director Catherine Corsini doesn't pull any punch depicting a love triangle of sort in Partir. Suzanne is a typical bourgeois wife of Samuel, a well-connected doctor. Children, big house, steady comfort, Suzanne has everything she could want, except passion. One day, she meets Ivan who make ends-meet working odd jobs and something clicks.

This very simple, very classic story is made worthwhile for several reasons. The main one being Kristin Scott Thomas delivering yet again a masterful performance. The role is tailor- made for this actress who knows how to subtly let us share the confused state of mind her character is in. Sergi Lopez and Yvan Attal are also good, although their roles are understandably much less challenging.

Where the screenplay shines is by not spoon-feeding us with justifications or condemnations for the characters. Suzanne's husband does seem somewhat boring, but he's not some evil one-dimensional character. And her new romantic interest Yvan is not an adventurous "alpha male". In fact, although Yvan does represent the freedom Suzanne never had thanks to his bohemian lifestyle, he seems like a somewhat vulnerable man and not terribly versed in "romancing" a woman. She seems more like the one pursuing him to enter this relationship.

Speaking of relationships, this is also where the movie shines. We're never entirely sure if what Suzanne is experiencing is true love, or rather if she's just looking for a way out from her husband and lifestyle. The director doesn't hold anything back, showing the vulnerability of each of the three character, how selfish they can be, discarding their responsibilities, lying and justifying reprehensible acts against each others.

This film is fascinating because, in the true tradition of French cinema, it goes for realism. You've seen some of these things happen around you, you may have lived through them. Watch this movie with a few people and you're likely to find people split. Some might sympathize with Suzanne, others with her husband, others with her lover. Yet others might sympathize with all three or none of them.

In short, Catherine Corsini is not trying to tell you what you should think and lets you make your own impressions throughout the events depicted. There is joy and pain in relationships because relationships, like us, aren't perfect. This is one such story, showcasing the imperfections.

My rating would be higher had we been provided with more context. We barely get a glimpse of Suzanne before she meets Yvan. As well, the conclusion did seem sudden and over-the- top to me. Lastly, I feel the husband and children could have used a few more minutes of screen time.

Leaving (2009)

A very dry slice of life, and a common and awful slice of life--the breakup of a seemingly okay marriage. It's a very modern, well off, pan European series of events, mostly taking place in the south of France. There is devastation, violence, sex, hurt children, hurt friends, and mostly a lot of pain between the ecstasies. And I suppose that's how it really goes down. Fair enough.

But not necessarily the most engaging movie. I'm not talking about being entertained, but about being lifted, or made to rethink something serious, or maybe even be swept away in something lyrical. Not so. This is deliberately (or not) a study in realism, and yet a glossy one, with some neat ends tied up here and there. I mean, it may be a series of fairly realistic events, but this is a simplified, "nice" world.

The one really solid reason to watch this is the stellar, nuanced, deeply felt performance by British actress Kristin Scott Thomas. The range of moods is amazing, and moving, if you can get absorbed otherwise.

She cheats, she lies, she leaves her family. You'd have every right to hate Suzanne, yet you don't. The one you hate is her self-righteous husband. It's nothing short of a miracle how Kristin Scott-Thomas and Yvan Attal pull it off. Admittedly, the script makes sure her betrayal brings out the worst in him, but I doubt you would take her side so easily if you read about it in a novel. It rings so true because writer-director Catherine Corsini works with a fine script and a first-rate cast. The way Sam cuts Suzanne off from the family fortune may be stretching the facts of civil law a tad, but it goes to show that there's no equality without economic independence. Despite its strong social message, the movie keeps you on the edge of your seat like a thriller. Take your family.

Sorry to interrupt the trend of the 3 enthusiasts preceding me. As is so often the case, the actors here save the movie from total ridicule. The director and camera-work also comes out pretty well. The rub is the screenplay, which is so French (a high testosterone level always the key)and so predictable. In Lady Chatterley, the husband was at least handicapped. Here, the husband is no less emotionally handicapped than his wife. As for the lover, well, please, I would expect something a bit more saucy than this ruddy and utterly unsavory Catalonian mason. Scott-Thomas does her best, and Attal is pretty convincing, but I guess they are paid to slog through this nondescript failure.

I enjoyed several aspects to the film, Partir. The opening scene catches the audience's attention by showing two of the main characters and an unexplained gunshot. The entire film keeps you intrigued and on your toes wondering what will happen next all leading up to that mysterious gunshot from the beginning. The director, Catherine Corsini , was born and 1956 and is a French director and screenwriter. She has directed 15 films since 1982, her latest being Partir, and her most famous La repetition was entered into the 2001 Cannes Film Festival. One idea found in the film is the determination to find true love and happiness. Suzanne is unhappy with her husband and children and she falls for a man, Ivan, which she eventually will do anything for. Another important idea in the film is marital problems. Suzanne falls in love with another man, confesses her affair but finds out she can no longer love her husband regardless of the money and housing her husband had provided her. An aspect of the film I noticed was that there was barely any music. The silence between scenes and conversations created more suspense and wonderment. For example, the scene when Suzanne tells her husband about the affair is completely silent throughout the conversation, which causes to you really engage in the scene. A second aspect to the film I enjoyed was the symbolism of the two houses Suzanne is torn between. There is her husband's house that is large, spacious, and dark, whereas Ivan's home is small, but is bright and welcoming. I recommend this film if you enjoy drama, suspense, and unexpected twists.

it's very deadly and absolutely out of control. when you fall for a man or woman, it's just like a sudden addiction, the lust and passion, the sexual desire are so strong that all the existing relationship, families, kids...anything would suddenly meaningless. it's an incurable blindness and nothing can be reasoned or rationalized by logic. this film just told us such a crazy obsession so destructive and dangerous. when you fall for a man and woman so suddenly with such huge impact, the morality, faithfulness and loyalty to your old existing relationship will be suddenly bounced like a bad check, the existing old checking and saving bank accounts related and honored to that check seem to abruptly become empty or overdrawn. an affair, an adultery would be just like that person suddenly decides to open a brand new bank account to another banking system. a regularly taking care of bonsai is suddenly forgotten. we have seen so many cases like this in our daily lives, and so many movies also portrayed such incidents. and this film is a great example to show you how a normal woman suddenly lost her marbles and so mysteriously fell for another man without any obvious reasons. a very weird case but in the mean times, seems to be also so understandable.

I can only concur with others. This film is a cliché. It's never shown or mentioned what is wrong with the married couple's relationship. She could have explained it to her lover, but no. Nothing. Then we get to the lover. Where is the attraction? He's not young, not good looking; all could be forgotten if he were charming or witty. Nope. Nothing to explain why an attractive wife would go for this ex-con. What a catch :) It could be bored housewife just looking for sex. Nope. She goes and falls in love with the guy. What nonsense. So we have a middle class family who seemingly want for nothing. Doctor husband. Wife needs do nought, but experiment with physiotherapy. An accident in the film and the doctor who treats her lover is her husband. How many doctors are there in Nimes? Quite. She falls in love with someone who in real life she'd not even fancy. Find dilapidated old cottage in Pyrenees to renovate and live in forever. Is there some software somewhere which churns out these plots?

"Partir," shown in the U.S. as "Leaving" (2009) was co-written and directed by Catherine Corsini.

Kristin Scott Thomas plays Suzanne, a French wife and mother who is bored with her "perfect" life. She is rich, beautiful, and seemingly happily married.

However, she decides to do something more than just be idle, so she returns to her earlier profession of physical therapy. Her husband is paying for an office for his wife, which will be adjacent to their home. Although wealthy, he squeezes every Euro out of the building contractor. That causes the contractor to hire a Spanish worker, who will work for non-union wages. Suzanne falls passionately in love with the worker--Ivan--and what happens next makes up the plot of the movie.

As someone pointed out on the message board, no one behaves intelligently. When she is desperate for money, Suzanne--despite her education and her elegance and beauty--ends up doing manual labor at the lowest level. (Literally--she's picking vegetables.) Didn't she consider working in a dress shop or as a receptionist if she couldn't find a PT position?

Kristin Scott Thomas is English, but she lives in France. She's very convincing as a woman who arrived in France when she was very young, and now is completely French. The movie manages to work because Scott Thomas has so much star power and such a strong screen presence. However, beauty and elegance can only take a movie so far. If you analyze the film carefully, the whole thing falls apart.

I saw the movie on DVD, and that worked well for the interpersonal aspects. However, there were several scenes of great natural beauty, which were lost on the small screen. I don't think that Partir is a movie worth seeking out, except if you are dazzled by Kristin Scott Thomas, who is in virtually every scene. However, I think it's somewhat better than the very low IMDb rating would suggest.

'Partir' (2009) is my first encounter with a film by the French director Catherine Corsini. The impression is mostly positive. Corsini (who is also the main author of the film's script) seems to me to be a mature filmmaker, master of her means of cinematic expression and well focused on the feminist thematics. She's also the type of director who knows how to choose the actors who fit her vision of the roles, letting them chose how they see the characters. In the case of this film, the lead role is played by the excellent Kristin Scott Thomas. The presence of this actress whom I appreciate a lot was the main reason why I chose to see the film. I was not wrong.

Suzanne, the film's heroine, seems to have everything she could wish in life. She is married to a wealthy doctor, lives in a sumptuous villa in the south of France decorated with modern works of art, has two teenage children who don't seem to cause any trouble. Looking for more interest in life, she plans to resume her occupation as a physiotherapist interrupted by the time she had to take care of the children. When she meets Ivan, a renovation tradesman, immigrant from Spain, who seems to have had problems with justice, what the French call 'coup de foudre' happens between the two. Does Suzanne and Ivan's relationship have any chance of being more than a simple extramarital affair? Everything seems to be against them - the husband's refusal to accept that he is losing his wife, economic conditions, social status. The price of fulfilling love seems to be huge.

I liked the directorial approach. Catherine Corsini doesn't judge her characters or condition her viewers to how they should feel. What happens between Suzanne and Ivan seems neither obvious nor inevitable. Nor is Samuel, the husband, an obnoxious figure, justifying feelings other than, perhaps, boredom. Kristin Scott Thomas has a complex and interesting role. Her Suzanne seems to be overwhelmed by feelings that erupt late in life. Attempts to control them rationally fail repeatedly in the face of emotions, and the woman herself seems bewildered by what is happening to her. Fighting the system and the people around has little chance of success. The two men in Suzanne's life are played by Sergi López and Yvan Attal. Both are excellent actors, although their roles are not as plentiful. 'Partir' manages to overcome the limits of a routine family drama and gives viewers a taste of true life and genuine feelings.

This is a movie that stays with you for a long time after viewing. The acting is extraordinary, the attraction between the two main characters palpable, the photography and sceneries beautiful. I really don't see why so much negative criticism is directed toward the plot. Passion has existed since time beginning and this is what this movie is all about, an uncontrollable, all consuming passion, which is made very believable by the wonderful.Kristin Scott Thomas. Sergi López is perfect as the lover, passionate, tender and vulnerable. If you are looking for the reason why Suzanne falls in love with him, those are the main reasons, besides the fact that he is obviously good looking. I enjoyed the movie tremendously. Every scene was essential to the plot, no gratuitous sex scenes here. And the style was elegant, as only the French know how to do.

The plot is very archetypical: rich wife who has everything but love, falls in love with proletarian man who has nothing to offer but love. Her husband plots from the sidelines like a true wealthy villain. The script is also very cliché and the characters aren't exactly nuanced. Acting is ok but KST gives of hysterical vibes while Sergi Lopez does a good job.

Not a bad movie, locations and camera work are super good, but don't expect much plot wise.

The upper middle-class lady meets worker and a passionate affair takes place. That's not an uncommon theme in our hemisphere, but it's very easy to parodize. Not at least when it's taken so seriously as here.

Of course the subject is a serious one, like all love stories are, both on film and in reality. But on film the rules are fairly known. We are aware of the signs, we expect a certain plot and certain things to happen and I'm sorry to say that this film doesn't make us disappointed, Or perhaps that's exactly what we are supposed to be and also are.

Don't give us another southern French passion story, until the genre is renewed.

A movie where nothing makes sense - where the story is the 50th rehash of some D.H. Lawrence story, where one trite cliché chases another. What on earth is the (frustrated or not) wife seeing in this Spanish laborer - I really want to know. He has the charm of an old dog, he looks like a (fat) old dog and - hold on - they make sex like ...how more boring can it get?

A script written by numbers, her son is in her side, her daughter is on dad's side, and on and on... it would all make sense in some kind of Latin telenovela. Terrible to watch what actors have to go through to make a living.