CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.3/10
8.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un detective a punto de jubilarse forma equipo con un profesor de Estudios Africanos para localizar a un asesino en serie que practica la antigua magia negra de Muti.Un detective a punto de jubilarse forma equipo con un profesor de Estudios Africanos para localizar a un asesino en serie que practica la antigua magia negra de Muti.Un detective a punto de jubilarse forma equipo con un profesor de Estudios Africanos para localizar a un asesino en serie que practica la antigua magia negra de Muti.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Bob Bowersox
- Police Forensic Tech
- (as R.T. Bowersox)
Dru Bramblett
- Jesse Boyd
- (as Virginia Dru Bramblett)
Dee Lucroy Dempsey
- CSI Photographer
- (as Dee Lucroy Demps)
Christina Grandy
- Internal Affairs Angie Cannon
- (as Christina S. Grandy)
Opiniones destacadas
Right from the start, I realized this film would be a flop due to the frustratingly amateur-hour directing by George Gallo. The constant back and forth location transitions from Europe to America were poorly executed and edited, and almost every scene screamed inexperienced directing. Gallo also failed miserably to direct his cast effectively, that is seemed like this was Cole Hauser's first ever acting job. His entire tone, demeanor and dialogue was too monotonic. Sure, part blame goes to the actor, but it's the directors job to know when an actor needs to act better or in a certain way. Only seasoned actors like Freeman rarely need cast direction, as he was the only one that was somewhat convincing in his character. Everyone else seemed inconvenienced to be on set.
The next huge disappointment was how three writers couldn't get a fairly decent premise, executed properly. Aside from the writing being cliched and having elements from pretty much every film in this genre with little to no originality, it was the ridiculous ending that the three writers, Bob Bowersox, Francesco Cinquemani and Luca Giliberto gave their viewers. It was by far the laziest, asinine, and idiotic ending I've ever seen. A fifth grade drama class could've done better.
Almost every element of this film - except the score, which was surprisingly fitting, should be examined in film schools on what not to do. It's a generous 3/10 from me, mostly as pity that Freeman has to live with this mess on his resume.
The next huge disappointment was how three writers couldn't get a fairly decent premise, executed properly. Aside from the writing being cliched and having elements from pretty much every film in this genre with little to no originality, it was the ridiculous ending that the three writers, Bob Bowersox, Francesco Cinquemani and Luca Giliberto gave their viewers. It was by far the laziest, asinine, and idiotic ending I've ever seen. A fifth grade drama class could've done better.
Almost every element of this film - except the score, which was surprisingly fitting, should be examined in film schools on what not to do. It's a generous 3/10 from me, mostly as pity that Freeman has to live with this mess on his resume.
Where to begin? The dialog sounds like it was written by someone who is trying to figure out how humans speak. The physical actions - the hand gestures, facial expressions, the movements in general are off - real people don't move, gesture, look, behave like this.
It's almost like writers and director were trying to recreate Bill Shatner's stilted speaking style - overly long pregnant pauses leading into still-born "revelations" (and I use that word loosely). Or maybe they were just trying to pad a 45 minute concept out to an 80 minute movie. The cinematography is weak. Sequences are poorly framed.
There may have been a nugget of a story at the heart of this mess, but this movie doesn't know how to tell that story in an interesting manner.
It's leaden, overly long and boring. I bailed after about 35 minutes and the only reason I didn't bail sooner was that I was making my lunch.
It's almost like writers and director were trying to recreate Bill Shatner's stilted speaking style - overly long pregnant pauses leading into still-born "revelations" (and I use that word loosely). Or maybe they were just trying to pad a 45 minute concept out to an 80 minute movie. The cinematography is weak. Sequences are poorly framed.
There may have been a nugget of a story at the heart of this mess, but this movie doesn't know how to tell that story in an interesting manner.
It's leaden, overly long and boring. I bailed after about 35 minutes and the only reason I didn't bail sooner was that I was making my lunch.
Poor storyline, poor execution. I'm very suprised that Freeman accepted this role. Nothing makes sense, script very badly written, no swat called, no observation, no communication between officers, bad searches and forensic evidence, nothing makes sense. Whole movie looks fake and it is just a waste of time badly directed and acted. Could be so much better if there was more suspension, real police work etc they didn't even bother to watch police activity on YouTube to see how to walk with a gun or watch some real good movies to at least try to make it more professional and concentrate on the quality of the outcome.
Wow, where to start?
This is bad.
1. Writing-The dialogue is stilted, monotonic, and only serves the purpose to provide exposition to the user. Very few of the writing seems natural or what two people in a conversation would say. In many scenes, it consists of two sentences and then move on to next scene.
2. Editing-The movie jumps from scene to scene without the cohesion between them. They are at a crime scene, at a bar, in Italy, at a university, in New Orleans etc , without explaining how or why they got there. The way the Cole Hauser's character and Morgan Freeman meet is not really explained, just thrown together.
3. Acting-Outside of Freeman, no one seems to have any emotions or facial expressions that matches the scene. Everyone has this 'serious' look regardless of the context.
4. Ending-Seems tacked on. Feels like they were running out of money and said, 'let's finish the finale in next two days'. It was rushed, again no cohesion with the final scene being so illogical or stupid that you want to throw something at the TV.
In short, this is a hard pass.
This is bad.
1. Writing-The dialogue is stilted, monotonic, and only serves the purpose to provide exposition to the user. Very few of the writing seems natural or what two people in a conversation would say. In many scenes, it consists of two sentences and then move on to next scene.
2. Editing-The movie jumps from scene to scene without the cohesion between them. They are at a crime scene, at a bar, in Italy, at a university, in New Orleans etc , without explaining how or why they got there. The way the Cole Hauser's character and Morgan Freeman meet is not really explained, just thrown together.
3. Acting-Outside of Freeman, no one seems to have any emotions or facial expressions that matches the scene. Everyone has this 'serious' look regardless of the context.
4. Ending-Seems tacked on. Feels like they were running out of money and said, 'let's finish the finale in next two days'. It was rushed, again no cohesion with the final scene being so illogical or stupid that you want to throw something at the TV.
In short, this is a hard pass.
I was hoping for another Se7en like movie, my favorite genre, but man was I wrong... What has come over these three actors to make this crap? Cole Hauser, Morgan Freeman and Peter Stormare? Are they helping out the director or something? Did they enter this out of pity?
7 minutes in and I was thinking "oh boy, this is going to be bad"... It's the vibe it sends from the beginning. The first actors were so bad, but so bad (bedroom scene) I got irritated from the start.
Awful color grading, dull lighting, terrible pace and really bad acting from all of the cast. This director was able to turn good actors into something cringe to watch.
I hate being mean, but this doesn't deserve any better. I don't know if I'll be watching the whole movie, unless I'm multi-tasking. Like I'm doing now.
7 minutes in and I was thinking "oh boy, this is going to be bad"... It's the vibe it sends from the beginning. The first actors were so bad, but so bad (bedroom scene) I got irritated from the start.
Awful color grading, dull lighting, terrible pace and really bad acting from all of the cast. This director was able to turn good actors into something cringe to watch.
I hate being mean, but this doesn't deserve any better. I don't know if I'll be watching the whole movie, unless I'm multi-tasking. Like I'm doing now.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaParts of the film were filmed at Millsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi.
- ErroresSeveral times when characters are holding Glock handguns, the trigger is visibly positioned at the rear of the trigger area, indicating that the firearm has been fired and the trigger wasn't reset. This makes the gun unable to fire. No trained handgun user would allow this, as they wouldn't be able to pull the trigger and shoot.
- Citas
Dr. Mackles: The more intense the scream, the more powerful the Muti.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Ritual Killer?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 17,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 320,461
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 32 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What was the official certification given to Muti: Rituales Mortales (2023) in Mexico?
Responda