CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.1/10
2.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
El presentador diurno del ya desaparecido programa de entrevistas liberal de Air America Radio habla sobre los acontecimientos actuales, con énfasis en la política.El presentador diurno del ya desaparecido programa de entrevistas liberal de Air America Radio habla sobre los acontecimientos actuales, con énfasis en la política.El presentador diurno del ya desaparecido programa de entrevistas liberal de Air America Radio habla sobre los acontecimientos actuales, con énfasis en la política.
- Premios
- 3 premios ganados y 23 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
Rachel is a sort of relief for me. After years of hearing extreme views coming out of America, I'd given up on the country. Rachel and before her, Keith Olbermann were and are proof that Americans aren't completely of their rockers. Sanity ensues.
One of the greatest moments on the show was when Rachel took one of the verbal droppings of the McCain campaign and said: "Wait, should we call this just ... LYING!?!"
Well said, Rachel, it's about time someone called these jokers out.
While Olbermann is really well spoken, eloquent and very passionate, Rachel is more toned down, has more of a sunny disposition and is in general more fun to watch. Olbermann is good too, but his subjects are sometimes so dark, which of course isn't HIS fault, that I get away feeling upset and depressed. Aww, it's hard to choose between them, love, love, love em both!!!
PS Someone who thinks Coulter is funny, is sick and twisted and a pox on all your seven houses.
One of the greatest moments on the show was when Rachel took one of the verbal droppings of the McCain campaign and said: "Wait, should we call this just ... LYING!?!"
Well said, Rachel, it's about time someone called these jokers out.
While Olbermann is really well spoken, eloquent and very passionate, Rachel is more toned down, has more of a sunny disposition and is in general more fun to watch. Olbermann is good too, but his subjects are sometimes so dark, which of course isn't HIS fault, that I get away feeling upset and depressed. Aww, it's hard to choose between them, love, love, love em both!!!
PS Someone who thinks Coulter is funny, is sick and twisted and a pox on all your seven houses.
"The Rachel Maddow Show" is no "Democracy Now!" - there are things that which Rachel Maddow resists discussing - but it's infinitely better than anything on Fox News (aka Fox Noise and Faux News). Maddow clearly does research in her reporting. The criticism of the show is usually either that it's a partisan show, or emphasizes Rachel Maddow's lesbianism and physical appearance. This is not an argument, but rather an ad hominem attack. Even if it's a partisan show, Maddow DOES interview people with opposing viewpoints, namely Pat Buchanan (the surprise is that ultra-bigot Buchanan is willing to be in the same room as a liberal Jewish lesbian). But most importantly, TRMS is an intellectual show: it includes segments about scientific topics, including environmental issues. I consider it a good show.
I know back in the day when I listened to Air America that Rachel Maddow was something special. She impressed me then as someone who had a keen grasp of what was happening and could translate it into terms that anyone could understand.
I believe that it is not only her impressive academic credentials that contribute to this, but a serious work ethic that causes her to do copious research on a subject.
This was evident as I watched her tonight. She knew her stuff! She is a charming personality that makes the news worth watching. The mainstream media on every evening during dinner can learn a lot from her.
So, skip Charlie and Brian and Katie, and get you news from Rachel. You will be a better informed American.
I believe that it is not only her impressive academic credentials that contribute to this, but a serious work ethic that causes her to do copious research on a subject.
This was evident as I watched her tonight. She knew her stuff! She is a charming personality that makes the news worth watching. The mainstream media on every evening during dinner can learn a lot from her.
So, skip Charlie and Brian and Katie, and get you news from Rachel. You will be a better informed American.
Total propaganda. If it were not for Trump she and that horrible network would all be unemployed. Her obsession with constantly discussing Trump is such a bore. I am not even a Trump fan. But there could be a war going on and all she would report on is Trump. Lame. I wonder if she is intelligent at all as she appears to be simply mouth piece for the far left. I have watched in and off over the years and honestly The Maddie show has gotten to the point that it appears to be obsession with the former president .I do not believe there is any news or discussion of need on her show at all. If you disagree with her she goes crazy. If you are a sychofant and pay homage she will interview you for hours. Horrible.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaNamed for its engaging and energetic host, Rachel Maddow, who gained a public profile through frequent appearances as a progressive pundit on MSNBC.
- ConexionesFeatured in Newswipe: Episode 3 (2010)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Rachel Maddow Show have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- The Rachel Maddow Show the First 100 Days
- Locaciones de filmación
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was The Rachel Maddow Show (2008) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda