CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.7/10
11 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un astronauta lucha por mantener el control de la realidad a bordo de una misión a Titán, la luna de Saturno, que puede resultar fatal.Un astronauta lucha por mantener el control de la realidad a bordo de una misión a Titán, la luna de Saturno, que puede resultar fatal.Un astronauta lucha por mantener el control de la realidad a bordo de una misión a Titán, la luna de Saturno, que puede resultar fatal.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Ágota Dunai
- Astronaut Candidate
- (sin créditos)
Nahna James
- Astronaut Candidate
- (sin créditos)
Ferenc Iván Szabó
- Astronaut Candidate
- (sin créditos)
Harry Szovik
- Additional voices
- (voz)
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The script lacks in the science and engineering department, and the characters seem incompetent.
Within the first 20 minutes, we already know the main protagonist is an unreliable narrator who exudes whatever the opposite of confidence and leadership is. His crewmate is similarly unreliable, talking behind the captains back. The captain calls the spaceship an 'aircraft' and handwave-explains 'fatigue and buckling' despite there being no explanation for what would cause cyclic stresses on the structure. We also got in the first 30 minutes that their mission is to reach Titan's methane, to make fuel, to somehow solve climate change. It all just sounds like mumbo-jumbo written by an arts student.
You need something like Andy Weir's 'The Martian' or the upcoming Project Hail Mary adaption; i.e. The best-of-the-best astronauts being actually believable world-class highly trained and skilled experts and problem-solvers. The physics doesn't have to be 100% in a sci-fi (Interstellar worked pretty well throughout bar that one line about love transcending space and time), but for any deviations the characters have to 100% support the narrative for it to be believed by the audience. These astronauts are immediately whispering to each other about mutiny from the start... and keep forgetting that there's audiovideo recording in each room allowing the captain to hear the sceme. I can't believe that these characters are actually astronauts.
Please please please stop with this artificially induced drama hinging on main characters being incompetent, keeping secrets from each other, or scheming against each other for no good reaon. Stop with the secrets which the 3rd party witnesses... It's like where movies have 2 people talk or kiss, for the 3rd jealous person to spot it or to get the wrong impression. It's a frustrating cliche. If the drama would be resolved by one character speaking one sentence to another character, it's weak writing.
With Insterstellar, I felt awe that made my arm hairs stand on end. With Slingshot I just feel frustrated and claustrophobic. Slingshot is weak writing.
Within the first 20 minutes, we already know the main protagonist is an unreliable narrator who exudes whatever the opposite of confidence and leadership is. His crewmate is similarly unreliable, talking behind the captains back. The captain calls the spaceship an 'aircraft' and handwave-explains 'fatigue and buckling' despite there being no explanation for what would cause cyclic stresses on the structure. We also got in the first 30 minutes that their mission is to reach Titan's methane, to make fuel, to somehow solve climate change. It all just sounds like mumbo-jumbo written by an arts student.
You need something like Andy Weir's 'The Martian' or the upcoming Project Hail Mary adaption; i.e. The best-of-the-best astronauts being actually believable world-class highly trained and skilled experts and problem-solvers. The physics doesn't have to be 100% in a sci-fi (Interstellar worked pretty well throughout bar that one line about love transcending space and time), but for any deviations the characters have to 100% support the narrative for it to be believed by the audience. These astronauts are immediately whispering to each other about mutiny from the start... and keep forgetting that there's audiovideo recording in each room allowing the captain to hear the sceme. I can't believe that these characters are actually astronauts.
Please please please stop with this artificially induced drama hinging on main characters being incompetent, keeping secrets from each other, or scheming against each other for no good reaon. Stop with the secrets which the 3rd party witnesses... It's like where movies have 2 people talk or kiss, for the 3rd jealous person to spot it or to get the wrong impression. It's a frustrating cliche. If the drama would be resolved by one character speaking one sentence to another character, it's weak writing.
With Insterstellar, I felt awe that made my arm hairs stand on end. With Slingshot I just feel frustrated and claustrophobic. Slingshot is weak writing.
The best part of this movie is the ending, which will deceive the viewer several times. Laurence Fishburne played his role, as always, perfectly. Casey Affleck did well, but I was never impressed by his performance, although this is just my personal subjective judgment. Yes, it's not easy to watch this movie to the end, and this is its main disadvantage, it was especially hard for me to watch Affleck's caramel flashbacks, but I still watched this movie - the film turned out to be quite good. Given the complexity of the plot and ambiguous characters, it is impossible not to mention the merits of the director. Visual style, musical accompaniment - all this works to create a unique closed atmosphere. The film may not become a cult classic, but it definitely deserves the attention of those who like thoughtful and ambiguous stories.
This has to be like the fourth or fifth movie featuring astronauts on a distant mission, but being about the psychological state of the lead character, in the last few years. This things are usually giving themselves away immediately: artificial gravity, LED light everywhere, big screens, big spaces, lectures for children about the Solar System given to trained astronauts, things unravelling or not making sense, but always, always someone obsessively thinking about people in their past: lovers, children, parents. Because it makes perfect sense for a person to go through years of rigorous training to perform a specific mission and then, when they get the job, out of a lot of hard working and highly motivated candidates, they spend it regretting things and thinking about the past. And they were the best candidate out of them all!
What's the point?! Who watched these and then said "yes, that's exactly what I needed! A psychological drama, but set in space, although nothing spacy really happens!"? Science fiction folk don't care about the drama of it, they want the action and the science and the gadgets and maybe to feel that there is more to life than just the daily whining of people. And drama people want some sort of highly emotional story involving multiple people, but somehow resembling their life, not some person in a small space having a fit. What a completely useless film!
So, yeah, let's call this small-space-fiction. And the writer is Nathan Parker, of Moon fame! He did one good film about a guy alone on a space station 15 years ago and thought to remake it, but without a story?
Bottom line: the story is so flimsy that I can't talk about it without spoiling it. All I can say is that this is not science fiction, because there is no science, and one can hardly call it fiction, because it doesn't have the coherence of fiction. It's like a nightmare that makes no sense and you barely remember when you wake up from it. The only positive thing is that it was decently acted.
What's the point?! Who watched these and then said "yes, that's exactly what I needed! A psychological drama, but set in space, although nothing spacy really happens!"? Science fiction folk don't care about the drama of it, they want the action and the science and the gadgets and maybe to feel that there is more to life than just the daily whining of people. And drama people want some sort of highly emotional story involving multiple people, but somehow resembling their life, not some person in a small space having a fit. What a completely useless film!
So, yeah, let's call this small-space-fiction. And the writer is Nathan Parker, of Moon fame! He did one good film about a guy alone on a space station 15 years ago and thought to remake it, but without a story?
Bottom line: the story is so flimsy that I can't talk about it without spoiling it. All I can say is that this is not science fiction, because there is no science, and one can hardly call it fiction, because it doesn't have the coherence of fiction. It's like a nightmare that makes no sense and you barely remember when you wake up from it. The only positive thing is that it was decently acted.
First off, I have to say that the film managed to surprise me because I was expecting a pretty bad production... Because 2024 continues to be a year where major studios market bad films with big actors and big directors...
"An astronaut on a potentially doomed mission to Saturn's moon Titan struggles to maintain his grip on reality."
The film, with its back-and-forth narrative reminiscent of "Solaris" (not the 1972 version, but more like the 2002 one), is directed by Mikael Håfström, who had already shown his inclination towards this style of storytelling in his earlier film "1408" (2007), an adaptation of Stephen King's short story of the same name, which brought him recognition from a wider audience.
Casey Affleck and Laurence Fishburne have given their best, and I think they've delivered a performance that's adequate for this middling film and doesn't deserve the harsh criticism it has received.
One wishes to see more of space in this film, which was entirely shot in a studio...
The film's score is composed by Lorne Balfe, and to give credit where it's due, the music is even better than the film itself.
At the end of the day, we, as fans of science fiction and horror cinema, are certain that as of 2024, we won't be getting any more masterpieces, but at least we want films that are decent. In this context, "Slingshot" is a film that "does the job."
"An astronaut on a potentially doomed mission to Saturn's moon Titan struggles to maintain his grip on reality."
The film, with its back-and-forth narrative reminiscent of "Solaris" (not the 1972 version, but more like the 2002 one), is directed by Mikael Håfström, who had already shown his inclination towards this style of storytelling in his earlier film "1408" (2007), an adaptation of Stephen King's short story of the same name, which brought him recognition from a wider audience.
Casey Affleck and Laurence Fishburne have given their best, and I think they've delivered a performance that's adequate for this middling film and doesn't deserve the harsh criticism it has received.
One wishes to see more of space in this film, which was entirely shot in a studio...
The film's score is composed by Lorne Balfe, and to give credit where it's due, the music is even better than the film itself.
At the end of the day, we, as fans of science fiction and horror cinema, are certain that as of 2024, we won't be getting any more masterpieces, but at least we want films that are decent. In this context, "Slingshot" is a film that "does the job."
No pun intended - the movie is quite ... well if you have claustrophobia ... you may have issues watching it. But even though the space out there seems endless, this is not the first science ficiton movie that will make you squirm ... the effects help with that too of course.
Good actors involved - and I reckon even if you can guess the twist(s) the movie is holding back on and for you, you will be able to enjoy the whole experience. Enjoy is something that I wouldn't say is a feeling the crew of the ship is feeling ... even less so with the stuff that is used (including those dreams) ... and I try to stay vague but also specific with this! If you have seen the movie you'll understand how that works and what I (or we) mean ... though mostly I ... no I of the tiger (or pun intended).
Great ending - though it may have ended a bit earlier and be more .. let's call it open ...
Good actors involved - and I reckon even if you can guess the twist(s) the movie is holding back on and for you, you will be able to enjoy the whole experience. Enjoy is something that I wouldn't say is a feeling the crew of the ship is feeling ... even less so with the stuff that is used (including those dreams) ... and I try to stay vague but also specific with this! If you have seen the movie you'll understand how that works and what I (or we) mean ... though mostly I ... no I of the tiger (or pun intended).
Great ending - though it may have ended a bit earlier and be more .. let's call it open ...
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe videogame "crypt junkie" is actually the vintage game Prince of persia (MS-DOS)
- ErroresAt one point, Zoe (Emily Beecham), says to John, (Casey Affleck) something to the effect of "And you were flying F-14's..." Assuming this film is set in the somewhat near future, and the fact that John attended the U.S. Air Force Academy, John would not be flying F-14's as that is a Naval aircraft AND hasn't been in the U.S. Naval inventory since 2006.
- Bandas sonorasDon't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Written by Bennie Benjamin, Horace Ott and Sol Marcus
Performed by The Animals feat. Eric Burdon (vocals)
[Plays briefly on the trailer]
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Slingshot?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Slingshot
- Locaciones de filmación
- Korda Studios, Etyek, Hungría(Studio)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 735,738
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 491,796
- 1 sep 2024
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 818,279
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 48min(108 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta