Una familia muy unida que se desgarra cuando un nuevo movimiento, «El cambio», envuelve al país.Una familia muy unida que se desgarra cuando un nuevo movimiento, «El cambio», envuelve al país.Una familia muy unida que se desgarra cuando un nuevo movimiento, «El cambio», envuelve al país.
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
It's both amusing and unsettling to watch this family unravel year by year. The film is surprisingly deep and sharply ironic.
The opening immediately reminded me of The Handmaid's Tale (there are even two cast members from the series in this movie). A once-happy family is thrown into chaos as political tensions rise, triggered by their son's girlfriend entering their lives right as the political movement intensifies.
The message is clear: when people become extreme in any belief, anything can happen, literally. As the old social order collapses alongside its devoted followers, the new "change" leaves no room for dissent. Even the ones who ignite the movement can't control it once everything spirals out of hand.
Diane Lane's performance is top-notch, as always. The rest of the cast is equally brilliant and convincing.
Dylan O'Brien's character made me genuinely hate him, in a good way. He was once a "loser" in the old world, but he thrives under the new dictatorship, where he finally holds power.
This film reflects our society in a chilling way. It feels real, something that could happen in the future, and something that has already happened in the past. No doubt about it.
The opening immediately reminded me of The Handmaid's Tale (there are even two cast members from the series in this movie). A once-happy family is thrown into chaos as political tensions rise, triggered by their son's girlfriend entering their lives right as the political movement intensifies.
The message is clear: when people become extreme in any belief, anything can happen, literally. As the old social order collapses alongside its devoted followers, the new "change" leaves no room for dissent. Even the ones who ignite the movement can't control it once everything spirals out of hand.
Diane Lane's performance is top-notch, as always. The rest of the cast is equally brilliant and convincing.
Dylan O'Brien's character made me genuinely hate him, in a good way. He was once a "loser" in the old world, but he thrives under the new dictatorship, where he finally holds power.
This film reflects our society in a chilling way. It feels real, something that could happen in the future, and something that has already happened in the past. No doubt about it.
My theory: This is not merely a movie. This is a warning of what is about to happen. I believe that with movie like this can both warn us and by watching our reviews understand how we feel about what's coming. This is one of the more important movies of the decade. Brace yourselves and good luck to us all.
Baron Nathan Rothschild has been quoted as saying "When there's blood in the streets, buy real estate." This sentiment, beyond the obvious reference to financial opportunities, also expresses the idea that division and chaos create opportunities for political revision. And as history has so often demonstrated that revision can manifest in negative ways.
A single, close-knit family celebrates an anniversary, every toast invokes love, but over the course of five years the story moves inextricably toward the antithesis. The close-knit weave is unravelled. A political evolution is occurring, sparked by a book written by the girlfriend of the young son in the family. The result is a family divided and increasing at odds and edgy.
Diane Lane, Kyle Chandler, Zoey Deutch and the rest of the cast excel. The screenplay itself attempts to be a cautionary tale, a psychological thriller, and a study in the corrupting nature of power. It only partially succeeds, because it touches too lightly on the subject matter--we never learn anything about political movement itself, the ideology behind it. The story should have been told through a limited series of three episodes.
It does however remind us quite clearly how what often appears as a simple grassroots movement, and appeals to the masses, can be saturated with malfeasance. We need to be cautious, and history should be studied. Prevent those who want to control it.
A single, close-knit family celebrates an anniversary, every toast invokes love, but over the course of five years the story moves inextricably toward the antithesis. The close-knit weave is unravelled. A political evolution is occurring, sparked by a book written by the girlfriend of the young son in the family. The result is a family divided and increasing at odds and edgy.
Diane Lane, Kyle Chandler, Zoey Deutch and the rest of the cast excel. The screenplay itself attempts to be a cautionary tale, a psychological thriller, and a study in the corrupting nature of power. It only partially succeeds, because it touches too lightly on the subject matter--we never learn anything about political movement itself, the ideology behind it. The story should have been told through a limited series of three episodes.
It does however remind us quite clearly how what often appears as a simple grassroots movement, and appeals to the masses, can be saturated with malfeasance. We need to be cautious, and history should be studied. Prevent those who want to control it.
"Anniversary" quietly shows up on new release rentals barely a month after it played in theaters, and that already tells you something about it. The synopsis sounded provocative, which is exactly what pulls me in when I am picking something to watch, and the moment I hit play it felt like the movie's ideas were already playing out in real time, not just on screen but in the way the movie itself had been handled. Right from the start it is walking a tightrope, trying to say something meaningful while also being affected by the very thing it is commenting on, especially with the studio barely promoting it at all, which weirdly only makes it more interesting. That quiet rollout becomes part of the experience whether it meant to or not. The dialogue feels natural and sharp, delivered by a group of very strong actors led by Diane Lane, and honestly the casting does a lot of the heavy lifting. Just the choice of actresses for the three sisters is enough to make you want to stick around and see where it all goes.
Amazing acting, Especially Dianne Lane. This is not for sissies, this is a "Manchurian Candidate" in reverse. The "villain" is clever, incredibly clever. The politics are current , think "Groyper " credo on steroids. The art world is certainly mirroring the real world, "Civil War, One Battle After Another, "After the party", and now Anniversary.
We need to make more of these films.
We need to make more of these films.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThere was some controversy upon the movie's release. The film's team, including Jan Komasa's representatives, and the producer, accused Lionsgate of suppressing the movie's release and marketing. They claimed the film was an "incendiary" topic and that the studio was afraid of how it would be received emotionally in a polarized political climate (despite the film itself not portraying political sides or mentioning specific parties). Critics noted the unusually low profile of the film, with a limited theatrical release (809 screens) and a lack of reviews from major news outlets. There was also very little promotion for the film which is uncommon for a movie with a popular star-studded cast. Many of the talents in front of the camera also 'distanced themselves' from the project with the films 'toned down' premiere only being attended by a couple of the primary actors. Despite largely positive reviews and excellent notices for the lead cast (notably Diane Lane and Dylan O'Brien), the films box office performance suffered as a result due to the lack of marketing. Allegedly, the powers that be also held back the film from Academy voters - despite Oscar buzz for Diane Lane.
- Citas
Josh Taylor: The world's changed, Mom. Someone's gotta bridge the gap.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Anniversary?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 551,286
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 260,691
- 2 nov 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 672,711
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 51min(111 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta







