Describe los eventos que llevaron a la masacre de los adultos de un pequeño pueblo en Nebraska por sus hijos, después de que la irresponsabilidad de los adultos arruina la cosecha y el futur... Leer todoDescribe los eventos que llevaron a la masacre de los adultos de un pequeño pueblo en Nebraska por sus hijos, después de que la irresponsabilidad de los adultos arruina la cosecha y el futuro de los niños.Describe los eventos que llevaron a la masacre de los adultos de un pequeño pueblo en Nebraska por sus hijos, después de que la irresponsabilidad de los adultos arruina la cosecha y el futuro de los niños.
Alyla Browne
- Angie
- (as a different name)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The kid actors are better here. The original movie is fondly remembered by fans due to the outstanding performance by John Franklin as Isaac, but a lot of people aren't aware of the fact Franklin was actually an adult when he played the role - he was 24 years old at the time of filming. This time around the role of mini cult leader goes to an actual child in the form of Kate Moyer as Eden and she absolutely nails it!
Check this one out for yourselves. It's got some inventive kills, decent pacing and the leads do a substantial job of keeping you invested all the way through. The ending might be the weakest element of the entire movie but as remakes go, I've seen worse and this one is a lot better than people are giving it credit for.
Check this one out for yourselves. It's got some inventive kills, decent pacing and the leads do a substantial job of keeping you invested all the way through. The ending might be the weakest element of the entire movie but as remakes go, I've seen worse and this one is a lot better than people are giving it credit for.
I'm going to start off by saying that I did not like this film. But then, I didn't like the original film either. Some reviewers seem to compare this film unfavourably to the original effort, but honestly, that wasn't any better.
The good: The acting is, for the most part, pretty good. Kate Moyer, in particular did a brilliant job. Her character, eden, is smug, arrogant, and contemptible, but all of that is down to her ability to portray such a character, and she does it brilliantly. The acting from the remaining cast is fine, though many of the actors essentially played emotionless zombies, so it's hard to rate.
The bad: There are a number of scenes that really push the boundaries in terms of the audience suspending their disbelief. There are a lot of blatantly obviously bad decisions characters make that it's hard to let go. And, the final scene is appalling; a cringe-inducingly feeble attempt at a final scare that doesn't even qualify as a twist.
What others have said: I've already mentioned that this has been unfavourably compared to the first film. I really don't think that was any better, though nostalgia has maybe altered some people's views.
I've also seen a lot of reviews lambasting the CGI. It certainly won't win any awards but it's nowhere near as bad as some of these reviews would have you believe. The same is true of the plot, which many reviews seem to regard as non-existent. There is a definite story told here, albeit imperfectly.
The main reason I disliked this film was the absolute ineptitude of the protagonists. There were so many opportunities to disrupt what was going on. I know the film wouldn't have worked if these things had been easily stopped, but it seemed like lazy writing to not out real, insurmountable barriers in the way.
Overall, not a bad film, but not one I would recommend either. If you're curious though, give it a shot and don't be dissuaded by the overly-negative reviews.
The good: The acting is, for the most part, pretty good. Kate Moyer, in particular did a brilliant job. Her character, eden, is smug, arrogant, and contemptible, but all of that is down to her ability to portray such a character, and she does it brilliantly. The acting from the remaining cast is fine, though many of the actors essentially played emotionless zombies, so it's hard to rate.
The bad: There are a number of scenes that really push the boundaries in terms of the audience suspending their disbelief. There are a lot of blatantly obviously bad decisions characters make that it's hard to let go. And, the final scene is appalling; a cringe-inducingly feeble attempt at a final scare that doesn't even qualify as a twist.
What others have said: I've already mentioned that this has been unfavourably compared to the first film. I really don't think that was any better, though nostalgia has maybe altered some people's views.
I've also seen a lot of reviews lambasting the CGI. It certainly won't win any awards but it's nowhere near as bad as some of these reviews would have you believe. The same is true of the plot, which many reviews seem to regard as non-existent. There is a definite story told here, albeit imperfectly.
The main reason I disliked this film was the absolute ineptitude of the protagonists. There were so many opportunities to disrupt what was going on. I know the film wouldn't have worked if these things had been easily stopped, but it seemed like lazy writing to not out real, insurmountable barriers in the way.
Overall, not a bad film, but not one I would recommend either. If you're curious though, give it a shot and don't be dissuaded by the overly-negative reviews.
The acting,camera/cinematography,sets,costume,score/music and sound was all well done. For me, what brought the suspension of disbelief to screetching halts were several little things in the building of the STORY. I personally didn't care for the special effect of the cornman...
I'm of the old school where slow and creepy can be more frightening than abrupt and obvious. The other special effects tho, were well done.
Not even a NOD towards the original story teller, Stephen King.
Most impressed with the acting and camera work.
I didn't HATE this movie. And You can tell a lot of money went into the making of it. I think the screenplay is where it went wrong.
It was just a leeeetle bit less than a "meh" for me.
Not even a NOD towards the original story teller, Stephen King.
Most impressed with the acting and camera work.
I didn't HATE this movie. And You can tell a lot of money went into the making of it. I think the screenplay is where it went wrong.
It was just a leeeetle bit less than a "meh" for me.
This was... a weird one. It had the vibe of a movie made for a pre-teen/high school demographic, yet had the language and gore of an adult horror. The script was also very odd, with some very odd acting to go along with it. I think that the two main girls did a good job... but everything felt so stilted and... odd haha it's hard to describe. It almost had the vibe of a weird 90s made for tv movie. Despite this, the movies looked great. The picture quality and shots looked quite nice and the effects/cgi were successful as well (even though the monster was quite tame). The main redeeming quality of this was the story, but this is like... the 9th iteration of it? So I feel like that negates itself. All in all I wouldn't recommend. 3.5 rounding up to a 4.
This was a hard one to get through. I don't even know what to say about this abomination. As other reviewers have said nothing makes sense the entire thing is just so unbelievable and laughably bad. Not that the original was great but it being the 80s I can forgive it, I don't know why they made and remade it a dozen times but I guess enough people watched them to make it profitable or maybe at least a tax write off but this one is beyond that. The writing is terrible, the acting isn't much better and the lead girl is just an annoying little punk who no one would ever follow. I watch enough horror to know they like to have ridiculous plots which I can forgive but an entire town of grown men, (farmers who aren't exactly soy boys) who somehow get taken prisoner and killed off by a group of 10 year olds and not a single one fights back lol nope. I never read the book so don't know how it works there but this was just stupid. Please retire this franchise.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilmed during the 2020 lockdowns. Was able to avoid production shutdown due to being financed from an indie production.
- ErroresWhen she uses the cigarette car cigarette lighter to ignite the gas stream to blow up the silo; by the time the lighter popped out, the talking they did, walking to the back of the car, and more talking: the lighter was still glowing hot. it would've been cooled to the point it wouldn't have been able to light the gas.
- ConexionesFeatures La dimensión desconocida (1959)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Діти кукурудзи
- Locaciones de filmación
- Rylstone, New South Wales, Australia(As fictional town, Rylstone, Nebraska, USA)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 10,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 325,583
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 263,128
- 5 mar 2023
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 575,179
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 33 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Children of the Corn (2020)?
Responda