En un mundo futuro, un hombre está encarcelado en una sociedad donde debe actuar para ganar créditos para comida y necesidades básicas. La primera película filmada desde un solo ángulo de cá... Leer todoEn un mundo futuro, un hombre está encarcelado en una sociedad donde debe actuar para ganar créditos para comida y necesidades básicas. La primera película filmada desde un solo ángulo de cámara.En un mundo futuro, un hombre está encarcelado en una sociedad donde debe actuar para ganar créditos para comida y necesidades básicas. La primera película filmada desde un solo ángulo de cámara.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Opiniones destacadas
This is just cube redone as a bunch of people in separate rooms. The only difference is most of the people are supposedly happy being prisoners. I guess that makes it original...
The main character is ok but boring. No way people are paying to watch him fart.
It was hard to stay immersed in the movie, your mind wanders as it drags on and on. It should have been a short on Black Mirror. The yoga chick is the only one worth watching.
This was a tight budget, 1 camera same rooms over and over, Crappy TV monitors. Whole thing reeks of cheap.
I would not recommend but it isn't awful, just boring.
It was hard to stay immersed in the movie, your mind wanders as it drags on and on. It should have been a short on Black Mirror. The yoga chick is the only one worth watching.
This was a tight budget, 1 camera same rooms over and over, Crappy TV monitors. Whole thing reeks of cheap.
I would not recommend but it isn't awful, just boring.
Honestly, I thought this was a pretty good film, at first I thought it was going to be cliche, and boring especially at the start because it's quite goofy but it turns into a good idea.
My only flaw with this movie is I feel like there's a lot of time not doing really anything, and it kind of just takes up the movie, if this film had more budget I guarantee it'd be 8+.
Therefore, I still recommend it, it was entertaining, just a movie you put on with 1 or 2 other people, not to watch with family or anything but just to relax and take in.
Overall, I really enjoyed watching this with my girlfriend, as it was a new idea we haven't seen, it reminded me of Nasubi, a Japanese sweepstake contestant who was "held" captive and was make to send out sweepstakes to live for 15 months in isolation.
My only flaw with this movie is I feel like there's a lot of time not doing really anything, and it kind of just takes up the movie, if this film had more budget I guarantee it'd be 8+.
Therefore, I still recommend it, it was entertaining, just a movie you put on with 1 or 2 other people, not to watch with family or anything but just to relax and take in.
Overall, I really enjoyed watching this with my girlfriend, as it was a new idea we haven't seen, it reminded me of Nasubi, a Japanese sweepstake contestant who was "held" captive and was make to send out sweepstakes to live for 15 months in isolation.
I was doing my daily ritual: taking 10-20 minutes scrolling through movie channels, adding things to watch later (and usually spending more time doing that than actually watching movies; I'll never, ever catch up to my list), and "Share?" popped up again. Today was finally the day I would give it a chance, and I was most pleased that I did. Thought-provoking, but not heavy handed, short, but not slight, and something I'll recommend to a wide swath of people. Might have to watch it again, and maybe very soon. (The last movie I wanted to see again almost immediately was "Beyond The Infinite Two Minutes".)
"Share?" is a Drama - Thriller movie that delves into the complexities of modern relationships and the consequences of choices in the age of social media. The plot follows a young woman grappling with the aftermath of an intimate video of her being shared online, and the emotional turmoil it creates in her personal and social life.
While I appreciate the film's attempt to address a relevant and thought-provoking topic, the execution left much to be desired. The premise, focusing on the impact of privacy invasion and the pressures of public judgment, has potential but felt somewhat underdeveloped. The pacing was uneven, with moments that dragged on too long, leading to a loss of tension during key scenes. The performances, especially from the lead actress, were serviceable but didn't evoke the emotional depth that such a sensitive topic warrants. While the protagonist's struggles were relatable, I found it difficult to connect with her character on a deeper level. The supporting characters, on the other hand, felt one-dimensional and lacked the nuance needed to elevate the story.
One of the movie's strengths is its exploration of the digital age's darker side, but the narrative often felt like it was skimming the surface of deeper issues, leaving me wanting more substance. In terms of directing and cinematography, while the visuals were competent, they didn't add much to the overall impact of the story. Ultimately, "Share?" offers an intriguing premise but fails to deliver a compelling or thought-provoking narrative, leaving me with more questions than answers. It's a movie that might spark some interesting conversation, but overall, it didn't live up to its potential.
While I appreciate the film's attempt to address a relevant and thought-provoking topic, the execution left much to be desired. The premise, focusing on the impact of privacy invasion and the pressures of public judgment, has potential but felt somewhat underdeveloped. The pacing was uneven, with moments that dragged on too long, leading to a loss of tension during key scenes. The performances, especially from the lead actress, were serviceable but didn't evoke the emotional depth that such a sensitive topic warrants. While the protagonist's struggles were relatable, I found it difficult to connect with her character on a deeper level. The supporting characters, on the other hand, felt one-dimensional and lacked the nuance needed to elevate the story.
One of the movie's strengths is its exploration of the digital age's darker side, but the narrative often felt like it was skimming the surface of deeper issues, leaving me wanting more substance. In terms of directing and cinematography, while the visuals were competent, they didn't add much to the overall impact of the story. Ultimately, "Share?" offers an intriguing premise but fails to deliver a compelling or thought-provoking narrative, leaving me with more questions than answers. It's a movie that might spark some interesting conversation, but overall, it didn't live up to its potential.
- If you liked the movie "Cube" or "Buried" you might want to check this movie out. It feels like a black mirror episode to be honest. It's definitely sci fi with an invisible commentary surrounding social media. It's a movie definitely not for everyone.
- It's has a fresh take on minimal , as few as possible actors and settings, type of movies. I love these type of movies. Be aware that the movie takes place on only 1 camera, meaning 1 camera angle.
- Melvin Gregg who plays #000000014 , actually does a great job. Decent acting and his screen presence kept me engaged and glued to the screen. He comes off as likable and has a kind heart.
- The first 15 minutes are definitely a mixture of, ' I hope this movie is good?', 'I hope the main actor can act with the material he's been given?'. The answer is yes on both.
- It instantly reminded me of Cube but with the whole spiel/layer of Twitch (the live streaming platform) permeating the movie.
- The soundtrack is a bit quirky at first but It really grew on me. I now hum it involuntary. 'dud' - dud dud dud.
- I have to admit , I really enjoyed this movie. It kept me guessing. And the character developments with its twists and turns were actually not bad. I am very happy I stumbled across it and gave it a try.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDirector Ira Rosensweig stated "it was very important to me that the actors could interact with each other in real time, so we built three identical sets next to each other on a stage. Equally important was their ability to see each other, as well as the need to establish fixed eyelines to each of the elements on their screen, without which the reality of the movie would have been destroyed. In order to achieve this, each set had a fixed camera integrated into a visual communication system that we created using Interrotrons (essentially, two-way teleprompters) connected to a live switching system. This allowed not only me, but each actor looking at their teleprompter to see a previsualization of the finished scene -- that included not only the live feed of the cameras in the other rooms, but also the computer interface as they typed and interacted with it."
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Share??Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 20 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Share? (2023)?
Responda