Akiresu to kame

Kitano trying something different - is kind of something you expect from him. Now while he could have just been doing Yakuza or silly comedies, he goes ahead and does movies like this. It's about art - not just his decision, but what this movie is about. Now there is quite a lot of comedy in it and there is also quite a lot of violence in it too.

It is what he knows to do - and he is good in it. And while I did not look into if there is any autobiographical aspect to it, it does feel like he at least is chanelling something about himself. It may feel like small pieces sown together, but there is craft in that, making it compelling and interesting to see the road and determination of an artist. It is odd, but it is also really good

The movie does not work in only one level; so it can be seen as a sampling of art, in this case: "painting"; from different viewpoints or dimensions. Good actors, humor Kitano style, the Japanese twisted style; however it is a mixture of 2 or 3 movies in one; changes radically from one part to another (the movie is not formally divided) and the only connection seems the art itself (that s not bad at all...) The first half has a coherent development of the script, good photography and shows us the protagonist as a school kid then as a young man. He, an almost autistic person that seems unaffected by the (good and bad) things that happen in his life. Perhaps the answer to why he continues to fail in his work. Failure to get emotionally involved in a way o another in such episodes or not take part physically or to be mentally affected by them, makes an artist that will not acquire the necessary skills (after assimilate and process its) to then translate them into his work; normally a way to say things or feelings of what a person (an artist) can not say in another way. We see a person who may have a natural talent for painting, or based on to paint and repetition developed good capabilities but do not know how to let out his own creative streak, which just ends up imitating the great painters or following great schools of painting in an evident level.

-in a second part of the movie, changes completely and we see Kitano, fulfilling the lead role and with his rough style and Yakuza pose, this main character loses all silence and dedicating autism demanding constantly to his suffered side kick wife; dragging them in a not so good life. In this part the artist is showed like an "art junkie" There s kind of humor here and the shots are more TV like ones. The movie could be better or could be at least two movies...

Machisu is an artist, and has been as long as he can remember. As a child, his mother died, followed a few years later by his father. His stepmother sent the boy to his aunt and uncle, who didn't want him; giving him to an orphanage. Painting was the only relief from the callous world he found himself in. Through art college, he experimented with various styles, never finding one that suited his vision. As he grew up, got married and had a daughter, his obsession with art intensified, until it became his sole driving force; to the detriment of his personal relationships. Will Machisu ever find a style that suits him, or will he be left unable to express himself adequately?

Takeshi Kitano's fourteenth film, 'Achilles and the Tortoise' is a poignant drama exploring the meaning and cost of artistic passion. Kitano's narrative- partially autobiographical- shows how Machisu's obsession with art blinds him to the reality and needs of his family, work and society. He becomes a self-indulgent beast, indifferent to the feelings of those closest to him. Likewise, his art suffers, and though he strains to attain an individual style, he never can. Although a little repetitive, the film acts as a pointed indictment of obsession- even of the artistic variety.

Conversely, the film also suggests that art can be a form of therapy. In his younger days- before his passion turned to obsession- Machisu's painting released him from the pain of his existence. Though he had no family to turn to, he had his paintings and peers in art college. They gave him hope, and the will to continue living. It is because of his love for art that he met his wife, and the years they spent together trying to further his career were certainly the best of his life. A film of much depth, various readings can be made with regard to its thematic content.

Visually, the film is stunning, with ingenious composition and clarity of images. Every frame could be a painting. Furthermore, the paintings seen throughout- done by Kitano himself- are striking, while Katsumi Yanagijima's cinematography continuously impresses. His use of bright colours, dynamic movements and symbolic elements contrast with the dark and tragic events of the narrative.

Moreover, under Kitano's direction, Yanagijima's work reflects Machisu's artistic evolution and experimentation. He uses different styles and techniques to match the different periods and influences that Machisu goes through, such as realism, expressionism, surrealism, pop and abstract art. The film also pays homage to some of the artists that inspire Machisu- such as Van Gogh, Picasso, Warhol and Pollock- by recreating their works and incorporating some of their motifs. Meaningful and expressive, 'Achilles and the Tortoise' makes for a unique and captivating visual experience.

Additionally, Yuki Kajiura's score is delicate and evocative, reminiscent of the work of Kitano's old collaborator, Joe Hisaishi. Kajiura's work complements the mood and tone of the film, adding to its emotional impact. Norihiro Isoda's subdued production design is in keeping with Kitano's minimalist style, enhancing the film's artistic expression. The simple and sparse settings- such as Machisu's studio, his home and gallery- allows one to fully focus on the paintings and the characters.

Isoda's work also draws inspiration from different genres and styles of art and design, such as the Japanese traditional art of calligraphy, modern arts like manga and anime, as well as postmodern ones such as pop and kitsch. Isoda incorporates these elements in subtle and clever ways, such as through the use of brush strokes, comic panels and neon signs. Furthermore, the film pays homage to some of the artists and designers that influenced Kitano, such as Hiroshige, Hokusai, Miyazaki and Murakami.

'Achilles and the Tortoise' stars Kitano as Machisu, alongside Kanako Higuchi as his wife Sachiko and Eri Tokunaga as their daughter. A quiet, enigmatic painter, who else could be better for the role than Kitano? He pulls it off with his trademark wit and ease, while Higuchi is marvellous, delivering a nuanced, believable performance as his long-suffering spouse. Tokunaga is similarly good, while Kitano regulars Susumu Terajima and Ren Osugi do not disappoint in all too small cameo roles as a Yakuza pimp and Machisu's uncle, respectively.

A film both fun and affecting, 'Achilles and the Tortoise' proves Kitano's skills as director, writer, editor and actor. Visually remarkable and boasting a fine score from Yuki Kajiura, it impresses on every level. Though at times the narrative might seem a little repetitive, its exploration of themes- such as the cost of artistic passion- is profound and intriguing. As the last chapter in a semi-autobiographical trilogy- including 'Takeshis'' and 'Glory to the Filmmaker!'- this is a memorable, philosophical film about the power and price of art that Achilles might have found to his tastes.

People may think that creators make a living by what they want to do. The working to keep living looks similar to what they really want to do at first. But, actually it's different for some people. Even if he seems to do what he wants, everyone wants more honor really.

This's the story about lives of an unsuccessful artist, Machisu and his wife. He had been nearby where he wanted to reach. That's why he had felt more frustrating by not reaching there. Neverless, he must create some things. I can image how tough it is. But he had to answer a need because he made a living by it. And his pride must not be able to let him publish the garbages to the public. How easier it is to make it just "a hobby".

If his goal was just realistic arts, his job will be replaced by AI easily. Is the art which has the goal worth?

It's just the "foundation" to give the persuasion and reality on his own opinion. Everyone can copy and draw realistically with practicing a lot. There's the trend and the styles everyone likes. So it's a bit stupid to ignore the flow stubbornly. The creators who make new things must know new and good ones and choose to adopt or reject them. There's some things --- sold well, liked by creators and acknowledged by everyone. It's exciting to live with them, but is also very tough. It's like a marathon without the goal. They're running out of breath forever. When they would stop it, it's "the End" really.

To go different way from the others, it would be a detour. Machisu couldn't creat even good things because he held too complexed things. There's something about him that made everyone feel that he looked great. But that kind of expectation became a handicap and dragged him down. He's like Achilles who cannot overtake the Tortois.

There's an absolute difference between getting the top selling and the talent.

Achilles and the Tortoise is the last installment in a loose trilogy actor/director Takeshi Kitano has made about the figure of the artist. Whereas the first two entries, Takeshi's and Glory to the Filmmaker, could basically be described as one big self-referential absurdist joke, Achilles is a more controlled film, with a proper story and a precise set of themes, albeit decorated with cheerfully absurd humor.

Such a scenario occurs right from the beginning, in an animated prologue which explains the bizarre title: as pointed out by the philosopher Zeno, if Achilles (the fastest mortal man, according to Greek mythology) and a tortoise competed in a race, and the latter had even the slightest advantage (say three feet), logic demands that in the time required for Achilles to reach that point, the tortoise would keep moving forward, and therefore the famous warrior, paradoxically enough, would never be able to catch up with the notoriously slow animal.

In Kitano's film, Achilles would be Machisu, a young boy fascinated by art, and the tortoise is success. Despite the boy's determination and occasionally bold choices of subjects (he has a knack for painting macabre events), his lack of stylistic originality makes all galleries shun him and most of his friends abandon him. Only his wife will keep supporting him, even in his older days (at this point, Kitano himself plays the role), when they're practically broke and their own daughter is ashamed to live in the same house as them.

Kitano's passion for painting is quite well known among those familiar with his work (he personally makes all the artwork that shows up in his movies), and so Achilles and the Tortoise is a good opportunity for him to use his hobby as a tool to reflect on the elusive subject of art and its various ramifications. Naturally, he does this with his usual penchant for darkly humorous set-ups, especially in the third act, with some scenes so audacious it's doubtful even something like Six Feet Under would have featured them. And yet one does not feel repulsed by those scenes. On the contrary, it's the absurdity of the plot, paired with Kitano's quietly composed directing and minimalistic performance, that constitutes the movie's primary point of attraction. In fact, Kitano's on-screen presence is so charismatic that perhaps he would have been better off shortening the first section of the picture and granting his quirky alter ego more room. Furthermore, the straightforward "happy" ending feels completely at odds with everything else, but then again coming up with a suitably crazy epilogue might have proved too arduous a task.

Ultimately, the only thing that seriously damages a part of this strange and, in its own way, funny opus is the running time (almost two hours), with minor help from the somewhat off- beat conclusion. Nevertheless, Kitano fans are likely to find something to embrace yet again, and anyone with some kind of interest in art should take a good, close look at this original take on the matter.