Beth, desilusionada, viaja a Roma a una boda y se enamora. Otra vez decepcionada, roba monedas de una fuente y enciende pasiones inadecuadas. Aparece un reportero, y debe probar que no es un... Leer todoBeth, desilusionada, viaja a Roma a una boda y se enamora. Otra vez decepcionada, roba monedas de una fuente y enciende pasiones inadecuadas. Aparece un reportero, y debe probar que no es un hechizo.Beth, desilusionada, viaja a Roma a una boda y se enamora. Otra vez decepcionada, roba monedas de una fuente y enciende pasiones inadecuadas. Aparece un reportero, y debe probar que no es un hechizo.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I agree with the many reviewers who said the comedy and antics in this one were forced and didn't work, to a large extent. However, a scene in a unique restaurant was reasonably original, and one in a crowded car was somewhat cute.
Both leads were attractive and performed adequately. I don't think the roles were much of a stretch for either one, but that's o.k. They are who they are, like Doris Day and Rock Hudson were who they were. I'm sure both of these actors will do some more drama in the future.
What the film lacked was subtlety. It was so frenzied, and tried so hard to be cute, that I felt a bit edgy in my seat. I wanted to say, "Just relax and let me find out more about who these people are." Even a few more quiet scenes with heartfelt dialogue would have sufficed.
But I guess the makers were committed to a formulaic approach. The price they'll pay for that is that the movie will quickly fade from your memory. That is not necessarily such a bad thing, as it did entertain, kept clean, and left one feeling some sense of hope about love.
I prefer that to pictures that add to my cynicism.
The humor mostly relies on a lot of physical comedy (people making blunders and bumping into things...), very little real "wit". I can't say even that the dialogue or the chemistry between the main actors was very good. But if you already know you're a sucker for romantic comedies (particularly heavily humor-laden ones, whether brilliant humor or otherwise), you will probably enjoy yourself. If you're the kind that is only rather surprised when you actually do find a romantic comedy you like, I really don't think you'll be finding it in this one.
No need to repeat the plot; the trailer says it all. And, really, with as simple a plot as it has, the trailer truly does pretty much say it ALL.
In short, it was relaxing and amusing (sometimes not the sort of amusing the director was going for, perhaps), and I enjoyed getting out of the house to go sit and catch a corny smile. Don't go if your demands or expectations are much higher.
Kristen Bell and some of the men almost save the day. But the chemistry between her and the lead isn't really the best. It's also not the best walk on a line between comedy and romance. But still that could be called nitpicking. And why would you want to do that, if you can just sit back and enjoy this as a boyfriend/girlfriend movie experience, instead of thinking too much about it?
I think I might have overlooked a few flaws, just because of the likability of Kristen and the charm of most of the cast.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDax Shepard appeared as one of Kristen Bell's would-be suitors. After this film, Shepard and Bell married.
- ErroresNick's character was famously struck by lightning while playing football for Syracuse University in a rain storm. Syracuse plays in a dome so he would not have been exposed to the weather.
However, he could have been playing an away game. It never was said the game in which he was struck by lightning was a home game at Syracuse.
- Citas
Beth's Dad: You could get your heart broken or... you could have the greatest love affair the world has ever known. But you're never gonna know unless you try.
- Créditos curiososThe cast is shown dancing as the credits roll.
- Bandas sonorasKicking with You
Written and Performed by Jason Mraz
Courtesy of Atlantic Recording Corp.
By Arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- When in Rome
- Locaciones de filmación
- Guggenheim Museum, Nueva York, Nueva York, Estados Unidos(Exhibition Venue)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 55,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 32,680,633
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 12,350,041
- 31 ene 2010
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 43,053,376
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1