[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

Premonición

Título original: 2:22
  • 2017
  • B
  • 1h 38min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.7/10
27 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
4,678
3,580
Michiel Huisman and Teresa Palmer in Premonición (2017)
Trailer for 2:22
Reproducir trailer2:29
2 videos
59 fotos
Ciencia FicciónConspiración y suspensoDramaMisterioMisterio de suspensoRomanceThriller

La vida de un hombre se descarrila cuando un patrón ominoso de eventos se repite exactamente de la misma manera todos los días, terminando exactamente a las 2:22 p.m.La vida de un hombre se descarrila cuando un patrón ominoso de eventos se repite exactamente de la misma manera todos los días, terminando exactamente a las 2:22 p.m.La vida de un hombre se descarrila cuando un patrón ominoso de eventos se repite exactamente de la misma manera todos los días, terminando exactamente a las 2:22 p.m.

  • Dirección
    • Paul Currie
  • Guionistas
    • Todd Stein
    • Nathan Parker
  • Elenco
    • Michiel Huisman
    • Teresa Palmer
    • Sam Reid
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.7/10
    27 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    4,678
    3,580
    • Dirección
      • Paul Currie
    • Guionistas
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Elenco
      • Michiel Huisman
      • Teresa Palmer
      • Sam Reid
    • 180Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 38Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 1 premio ganado y 2 nominaciones en total

    Videos2

    2:22
    Trailer 2:29
    2:22
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer

    Fotos59

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 52
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal61

    Editar
    Michiel Huisman
    Michiel Huisman
    • Dylan Branson
    Teresa Palmer
    Teresa Palmer
    • Sarah Barton
    Sam Reid
    Sam Reid
    • Jonas Edman
    John Waters
    John Waters
    • Bill
    Kerry Armstrong
    Kerry Armstrong
    • Catherine Mills
    Richard Davies
    Richard Davies
    • Inky
    Maeve Dermody
    • Sandy
    Remy Hii
    Remy Hii
    • Benny
    Simone Kessell
    Simone Kessell
    • Serena
    Mitchell Butel
    Mitchell Butel
    • Howard Pace
    Barry Quin
    Barry Quin
    • Samuel Keifer
    Zara Michales
    Zara Michales
    • Ellie
    Nancy Denis
    • Regina Jones
    Duncan Ragg
    • Jake Redman
    Jessica Clarke
    • Evelyn Mills
    Jack Ellis
    Jack Ellis
    • Noah Marks
    Michael-Anthony Taylor
    • Ticket Booth Man
    Thuso Lekwape
    Thuso Lekwape
    • Waiter
    • Dirección
      • Paul Currie
    • Guionistas
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios180

    5.727K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    8pat-394

    Enjoyable sci-fi thriller that doesn't pretend to be something it's not.

    Keeping this short, I don't understand why there's so many negative reviews of this flick. I see a repeating pattern for genre movies such as this, in that the sex & explosions popcorn actioner crowd seem to take it personally when they don't understand what's going on.

    Above average movies such as this and other hidden gems like "Predestination" get an unfair rap from the instant gratification legions, who seemingly don't like any pointed reminders that they're stupid.

    Good casting, locations, cinematography and a breathtaking soundtrack used to the best possible effect make this a welcome addition to the stable of movies that you wouldn't usually watch because of all the naysayers, but are glad you did once you do. Yeah, there's some minor plothole issues and the pacing was a bit confusing at times, but the good far outweighs the bad.

    Watch it.
    4shakercoola

    Overwrought and overstylised

    An American sci-fi drama; A story about an air traffic controller who is suspended from his job after a near miss incident, who starts to notice a reoccurence of the conditions that led to his suspension. Drawn into a complex relationship, he must figure out a way to control time itself. Pattern, repetition and predestination often feature in sci-fi fantasy movie plots, but when complicated ideas are ill-explained, it makes for difficult viewing for the circumspect viewer, even one prepared to suspend belief. The lead character is a poseur, a man of metropolitan cliché, rushing about carelessly - this runs in stark contrast to the traits one associates with an air traffic controller. The love story also feels unnatural. The stylisation of the film feels misplaced too with voiceovers that reduce the illusion further.
    6fandomfatale

    Average, more style than substance

    Overall I enjoyed this movie but I think it was more style than substance. The direction and visuals were excellent - it's possibly worth watching the movie solely for them, especially if that's your kind of thing. The aerial ballet and art exhibit scenes in particular (which you get a hint of in the trailer) were stunning. It's a well-made movie with a sufficient budget.

    I don't want to spoil anything, so I'll just say it reminded me of Knowing and Twelve Monkeys - however, compared to those two movies, the stakes felt rather low and the mystery was never particularly compelling, on top of being a little too predictable. I always felt I knew the general direction it was heading, even if I didn't have all the details yet.
    8peterfaure

    Entertaining, surreal movie

    I have to admit I don't understand the extreme negativity in some of the reviews.....especially considering the amount of uninspired garbage in movie theaters these days.

    Now, 2:22 is not a masterpiece, and like most movies it has weaknesses, but its strength is that it builds a sense of suspense without the usual car chases and urban shoot outs that seem to please the ADD crowds so much. The acting is solid (not Oscar material but better than hinted at in many reviews), the direction and special effects are very polished, and, more importantly, the slow accretion of mysterious details and surreal circumstances make it far more interesting, IMO, than most movies currently on offering. I think this movie also does a good job, overall, of hinting at parts of the ending but at the same time maintaining a sense of suspense about how exactly the mysterious events and patterns noticed by the main character will come together.

    This is not a realistic thriller, with a clear cut plot and an ending that explains every minor thread or detail in its story, or a relentless action movies with plenty of explosions and other events that ultimately mean nothing, or a bloated love story with SF elements. Hence, I think, the disappointment of some viewers.

    The way I see it this is a movie that, despite its imperfections, evolves into a subtle, psychological thriller that hints at man's endless fascination with patterns (in our Universe, in our life, in history etc) and at our sense of wonder of how we fit in it. A movie that while providing us with an interesting story also asks us to add to the plot our own interpretation of the events, and our own sense of wonder about the mystery of our existence.

    Now, there is no doubt that other movies on similar topics are superior (12 monkeys and Groundhog day come to mind, among others), but I still think this is one of the few movies worth watching I've seen this year, despite its limitations. At least it asks the watcher to actually engage his brain instead of just switching off and let the explosions roll on until the cardboard cutout bad guy/guys are vanquished.
    5SnoopyStyle

    premise problems

    In NYC, air traffic controller Dylan Branson (Michiel Huisman) has a premonition of a shooting in Grand Central Station at 2:22pm. He goes to work and nearly crashes two planes into each other at 2:22pm. He continues to encounter strange occurrences at 2:22pm. He meets art gallery owner Sarah Barton (Teresa Palmer).

    There is a good idea somewhere here and these actors could have made it work. I'm still not sure if this premise makes any kind of movie sense. It would probably make more sense without the complication of the past loop. It could be more compelling. I really like the beautiful looking couple although they could have some better writing. The movie just needs to clear up the rambling premise.

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      During its one week theatrical release from June 30 to July 6, it only made $422, making it the lowest grossing film of 2017.
    • Errores
      In the opening scenes of New York the Twin Towers are clearly visible. In a later scene of New York we see the One World Trade Center.

      The first scene is in the dream. At that time in the dream, the twin towers still stood.
    • Citas

      Dylan: In everyone's life there comes a time when the universe opens itself for just a few moments to show us what's truly possible.

    • Conexiones
      References La jetée (1962)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Cool on Fire
      Performed by Daniel Johns

      Composed by Daniel Johns / Joel Little

      Licensed by Sony/ATV Music Publishing (Australia) Pty Limited & EMI April Music Inc. Licensed by EMI Music Publishing Australia Pty Limited

      Under license from Eleven: A Music Company Pty Ltd

      Licensed courtesy of Universal Music Australia Pty Limited

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes18

    • How long is 2:22?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 14 de julio de 2017 (México)
    • Países de origen
      • Australia
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • 2:22
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Disney Studios, Moore Park, Sídney, Nueva Gales del Sur, Australia
    • Productoras
      • 2929 Productions
      • Entertainment One
      • Ingenious Media
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 422
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 294
      • 2 jul 2017
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 3,945,729
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 38min(98 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • D-Cinema 48kHz 5.1
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.