[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

Transmisiones siniestras

Título original: Broadcast Signal Intrusion
  • 2021
  • 1h 44min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.4/10
3.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Transmisiones siniestras (2021)
While logging tapes of decades-old TV broadcasts, video archivist James (Harry Shum Jr.) discovers a surreal and disturbing clip that James believes is the product of a mysterious broadcast signal hacking. His discovery takes a sinister turn when he tracks down similar broadcast intrusions that send him on an obsessive mission. Now James must confront two very real possibilities: that the videos may be clues to a crime beyond all comprehension; and that whoever was behind them may be very aware that James is coming uncomfortably close to the truth.
Reproducir trailer2:07
1 video
52 fotos
Conspiración y suspensoCrimenDramaMisterioTerrorThriller

A finales de los 90, un archivero de videos descubre una serie de transmisiones piratas siniestras y se obsesiona con descubrir la oscura conspiración detrás de ellas.A finales de los 90, un archivero de videos descubre una serie de transmisiones piratas siniestras y se obsesiona con descubrir la oscura conspiración detrás de ellas.A finales de los 90, un archivero de videos descubre una serie de transmisiones piratas siniestras y se obsesiona con descubrir la oscura conspiración detrás de ellas.

  • Dirección
    • Jacob Gentry
  • Guionistas
    • Phil Drinkwater
    • Tim Woodall
  • Elenco
    • Harry Shum Jr.
    • Kelley Mack
    • Chris Sullivan
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.4/10
    3.6 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Jacob Gentry
    • Guionistas
      • Phil Drinkwater
      • Tim Woodall
    • Elenco
      • Harry Shum Jr.
      • Kelley Mack
      • Chris Sullivan
    • 60Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 72Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 1 premio ganado en total

    Videos1

    Broadcast Signal Intrusion - Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:07
    Broadcast Signal Intrusion - Official Trailer

    Fotos51

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 48
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal15

    Editar
    Harry Shum Jr.
    Harry Shum Jr.
    • James
    • (as Harry Shum Jr)
    Kelley Mack
    Kelley Mack
    • Alice
    Chris Sullivan
    Chris Sullivan
    • The Phreaker
    Michael B. Woods
    Michael B. Woods
    • Macalister
    Arif Yampolsky
    • Chester
    Richard Cotovsky
    Richard Cotovsky
    • Brad
    Steven Pringle
    • Dr. Lithgow
    • (as Steve Pringle)
    Justin Welborn
    Justin Welborn
    • Michael
    Jennifer Jelsema
    Jennifer Jelsema
    • Nora
    Anthony E. Cabral
    Anthony E. Cabral
    • Group Sharer
    Madrid St. Angelo
    Madrid St. Angelo
    • The Proprietor
    Preston Tate Jr.
    • Manfred
    James Swanton
    James Swanton
    • SAL-E Sparx
    Jeff Dlugolecki
    • Creepy Guy in Alley
    • (sin créditos)
    Thomas Kosik
    • Bar Patron
    • (sin créditos)
    • Dirección
      • Jacob Gentry
    • Guionistas
      • Phil Drinkwater
      • Tim Woodall
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios60

    5.43.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    4parry_na

    Not very interesting ...

    Despite '60's supernatural soap 'Dark Shadows' making an appearance or two, and a villain that looks like 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation's Leatherface, this is a very talky, turgid affair.

    The film goes through all the beats of being fascinating - vaguely arthouse direction, intense performances, much grandstanding - but really, it isn't. There's nothing for the viewer to latch on to and becomes frequently incomprehensible. As a result, it seems to go on for far longer than its 102 minutes.

    A couple of creepy moments exist in a vacuum but aren't enough to generate much interest. When it ends, you'll wonder why you stuck it out for so long. My score is 4 out of 10.
    6Dottsylove

    interesting premise for a film

    These broadcast signal intrusions are really real. Go look it up on google. The one I know about is the Max Headroom pirate video back in the 80's CREEPY --and that's what this movie feeds on. Following a man as he searches for 3 of these specific intrusion to see if it leads to a pattern that has mystified police in the past. Creepy fun but didn't get the ending. 6.3 out of 10.
    4awfulketchup

    Feels rather incomplete and jumbled.

    Not sure what to say, it felt like I've wasted time on a incomplete mess of a movie that tackles conspiracy theories the same way a creepypasta parodies the dangers of the dark web. I'm pretty sure that this film was inspired by the ''I feel fantastic'' robot woman video that surfaced on youtube many years ago, on paper that sounds like a great idea but in reality what we have here is a movie that has nothing to be thrilled about.

    I know I'm sounding harsh and someone out there probably enjoyed this and the people behind it had great ideas, but at the end of the day, I was bored, couldn't get invested in the actors and a plot that had potential but kept stumbling, slowing the movie to a snails phase.
    4Victor_Fallon

    A man slowly goes down a very shallow rabbit-hole. Not a horror.

    Shum Jr is decent in the lead, but he's wrestling with a sloppy script and zero character development. The supporting cast is poor, all hammy hams. Every line is exposition - which I think is meant to be in the style of a 'hard-boiled detective thriller', but comes off as hokey.

    It's meant to be set in the late 90s, but the soundtrack seems to think this is a noir movie, full of saxophones and quirky embellishments. But there isn't a single visual noir element, so it never works. Then we'll get some 70s-style psychadelic music for no reason. What a mess. The cinematography flits between hand-held and locked at random, so there is no flow. It all boils down to poor direction.

    The story amounts to nothing - it's a simple procedural tale of a man investigating an unsolved mini-mystery with a bog-standard conclusion. For some reason, the movie is labeled as a 'horror', which is laughable. The VHS-style video 'intrusions' he is investigating are too hilarious to be creepy. And too innocuous. The 'crime' he is investigating for most of the runtime is the interruption of TV broadcasts. Why? Because the script says so, that's why.

    It's also too slow to be a thriller. It's like an extended X-Files episode, but not one of the good episodes.
    6kmashburn-00043

    The good outweighs the bad...

    Don't worry about spoilers. I'm not entirely sure I know what happened.

    I love obscure, ambiguous endings open to broad interpretation...up to a point. The ending here was a bit too "not sure how to wrap this one up, so...here you go." Roll credits. Or maybe it was the result of slash and burn editing. I don't know.

    The lead (James) was believable and intense, and the mystery, atmosphere, and creepy imagery definitely held my attention. The music was...ugh. Distracting and, well...intrusive at times. Almost like the composer was scoring a completely different film.

    I have my own theory about the ending, but this one requires a re-watch. Few horror movies warrant revisiting, but even with its flaws, this isn't one I'll forget 20min after the end credits. I'm not lazy about probing alternate interpretations, but I need something a bit more solid to work with. That being said, I will watch this one again and scour for clues. I rarely write reviews, but this one was effective as an "experience," if not as a full-fledged narrative.

    If you're OK with the slow burn and can tolerate a "WTF" ending, give this one a shot. I can overlook some of the technical drawbacks if a movie is unique, memorable, and brave enough to abandon the horror formula. The cliches are here, too, of course, but this movie is miles above 90% of current horror fare.

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      The film's SAL-E Sparx broadcasts are patterned after actual events. In Chicago, on November 22, 1987, someone wearing a Max Headroom (1987) mask interrupted WGN's 9 o'clock news for 25 seconds. 2 hours later the same person interrupted WTTW's airing of Doctor Who (1963) for 90 seconds.
    • Errores
      The Phreaker says he turned 15 in 1987, and the movie's set in 1999, making him 27. But the actor who plays him is over 40, and clearly looks it.

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes14

    • How long is Broadcast Signal Intrusion?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 22 de octubre de 2021 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitio oficial
      • Official site
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Broadcast Signal Intrusion
    • Productora
      • Queensbury Pictures
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 44min(104 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.