CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.0/10
1.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Tras presenciar el asesinato de su novia, un hombre lo arriesga todo, incluida la propia realidad, para descubrir la verdad.Tras presenciar el asesinato de su novia, un hombre lo arriesga todo, incluida la propia realidad, para descubrir la verdad.Tras presenciar el asesinato de su novia, un hombre lo arriesga todo, incluida la propia realidad, para descubrir la verdad.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Interesting concept, the movie was a bit slow to get to the really interesting parts, and spent way too little time exploring the full potential of what was possible. I blame the budget for the budget for this. That being said, the film as watchable. I wold also want to add that the entire idea was a bit derivative, but also had its own unique twist. A movie version of platos allegory of the cave, are we real? Are our dreams real?
At some point these matrix like remakes will get it jst right and create something that will shine a new light on exitence as a whole.
I particularly liked the perfomance of David Hewlett, I have liked his roles ever since Stargate Atlantis. He was the main reason I kept watching. The lead female role was also done well. CGI could have been better.
At some point these matrix like remakes will get it jst right and create something that will shine a new light on exitence as a whole.
I particularly liked the perfomance of David Hewlett, I have liked his roles ever since Stargate Atlantis. He was the main reason I kept watching. The lead female role was also done well. CGI could have been better.
The actors except for a few exceptions are solid, sadly one of them is the lead.
It started off fine, a bit of mystery, until about 20% in where they dump all the info about what is really happening.
The writer definitely does not read any Scifi, because out of all the possibilities this has got to be the lamest story lines I could imagine, as soon as I realised there is nothing clever the movie really went down hill.
Its basically just sims, crossed with the Matrix with a bit of action on top. All comes off as a very poor rip of some aspects of the Matrix without any of its depth. We even have a bit of "bullet time" special effects.
They ignored the "show dont tell" which would have made the movie better. And exactly why you should care about a game of sims as some sort of crime against humanity is just ridiculous.
It started off fine, a bit of mystery, until about 20% in where they dump all the info about what is really happening.
The writer definitely does not read any Scifi, because out of all the possibilities this has got to be the lamest story lines I could imagine, as soon as I realised there is nothing clever the movie really went down hill.
Its basically just sims, crossed with the Matrix with a bit of action on top. All comes off as a very poor rip of some aspects of the Matrix without any of its depth. We even have a bit of "bullet time" special effects.
They ignored the "show dont tell" which would have made the movie better. And exactly why you should care about a game of sims as some sort of crime against humanity is just ridiculous.
Good acting, interesting premise, good special effects (for it's budget) this movie has it all except that it is utterly boring. It's like Free Guy after they sucked every ounce of fun out of it. Cara Gee (the Expanse) couldn't save this movie from being bland but she is definitely a good watching point. The premise is interesting and while we have seen similar premises in Free Guy, Matrix and Inception we have never seen this exact premise in any movie that I know of. It could be a very interesting movie but it failed. I am being generous giving it 5 stars because it was made competently but it is so boring and after you know what is going on then it is just unbearable to watch and the final twist doesn't make up for it even though it's quite clever. This movie is barely watchable once, I would never sit through it a second time.
Whilst the script could have used refinement, some of the visual gimmicks were heavy handed, at the heart of this story is real substance. Unlike a lot of Hollywood movies, especially in genre adjacent stuff, this movie feels like it has a genuine human element as well as a sort of wistful philosophy befitting the subject material.
The special effects are beyond what one would expect from a low budget, and indeed so is the acting, which successfully sells the premise. On the downside there's a little too much exposition and as mentioned before reliance on visual gimmicks.
But where you can watch most blockbuster movies and feel like you've been exposed to no real new ideas, or effected by the premise, the heart this movie has makes the sci-fi experience more personal - as science fiction should be, a reflection of our human experience.
All told, worth a watch IMO.
The special effects are beyond what one would expect from a low budget, and indeed so is the acting, which successfully sells the premise. On the downside there's a little too much exposition and as mentioned before reliance on visual gimmicks.
But where you can watch most blockbuster movies and feel like you've been exposed to no real new ideas, or effected by the premise, the heart this movie has makes the sci-fi experience more personal - as science fiction should be, a reflection of our human experience.
All told, worth a watch IMO.
A mish mash of themes and tropes from movies that done them far better. There really isn't anything remotely original. The writing is flat and the actors don't seem to be very invested, I've seen far better acting during daytime soap operas. Cara Gee did OK but even she seemed to be phoning it in.
Nothing feels lived in, it feels like it is, them on a bad set with bad lighting and bad set design with no budget.
The special effects are early 90s level of bad. Lots of unnecessary lens flares and really, really, really bad green screen backgrounds. There's a weird soft fuzzy filter over everything.
The pacing is slow. It's really not exciting at all. Trying to be futuristic everything they touch bleeps and bloops.
As a hard core lover of everything scifi this was really disappointing. It doesn't even fit into "it's so bad it's good" territory.
There is nothing gained from watching this movie.
Nothing feels lived in, it feels like it is, them on a bad set with bad lighting and bad set design with no budget.
The special effects are early 90s level of bad. Lots of unnecessary lens flares and really, really, really bad green screen backgrounds. There's a weird soft fuzzy filter over everything.
The pacing is slow. It's really not exciting at all. Trying to be futuristic everything they touch bleeps and bloops.
As a hard core lover of everything scifi this was really disappointing. It doesn't even fit into "it's so bad it's good" territory.
There is nothing gained from watching this movie.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresIn the confrontation scene in Hunter's office, just after he's shot you see him falling from his top floor office from a distance, but he's falling at a constant velocity, not accelerating as he would if gravity was working normally. This is a good indication that the level they're in isn't the real world but just another level with different rules.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Everything New on Hulu in August
Everything New on Hulu in August
There's a whole lot to love about Hulu's streaming offerings this month — get excited for brand-new series premieres and film favorites to watch at home.
- How long is Levels?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta