Tras luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos amigos del Ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley, con la paz de la posguerra en peligro.Tras luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos amigos del Ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley, con la paz de la posguerra en peligro.Tras luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos amigos del Ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley, con la paz de la posguerra en peligro.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Brian F. Durkin
- Blackjack
- (as Brian Durkin)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Wasn't a bad movie. Subtitles kept distracting me from the story. Wasn't able to turn them off.
I was waking up, and it's an easy movie to follow with a decent script, historical value because of the Civil War timeframe. I recommend this adventure is one you could add to movie night and be ok with.
This movie is a throwback to the B-westerns of yesteryear. Trouble is, those old B-westerns are feats of epic cinema compared to this 2020 version of the American Western. And it's a shame, too. Here is THE vehicle that launched many an outstanding and treasured career - Wayne, Mitchum, Stewart, McQueen, Marvin, etc . . . Only these "leading" actors forgot to do their home work. The acting is "Al-Gore-wooden-like" as each actor struggles to strike their best pose to reveal their best side as they regurgitate their canned lines. There is no emotion or meaning to their words - they're just canned lines to be said, not communicated, just said. The Shea Sizemore screenplay makes sense, but it didn't get pulled together. The score adds nothing to the movie. In fact, at times it would be best if there were no score. I lay the quality of this film at the feet of the one to blame - Director Brent Christy. I apparently have never seen a Brent Christy-directed film - I hope I don't again. This film is all over the place, chasing it's tail. Siskel & Ebert - Beware!
Why do people expect perfect acting and perfect editing to tell a good story?
The acting was good enough and the editing was okay, but the story was really good.
It was also great seeing a movie without the gratuitous sex and foul language.
Well worth the time spent to enjoy a good story about good men dealing with a bad situation.
The acting was good enough and the editing was okay, but the story was really good.
It was also great seeing a movie without the gratuitous sex and foul language.
Well worth the time spent to enjoy a good story about good men dealing with a bad situation.
As someone who can understand that good westerns died with the 21st century, I didn't mind this movie at all. It had its flaws but it still had everything a western needs. There were a few parts I even found comical.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresThis movie is set in the 1800's yet "Intel" is used - a term that only came into use in 1961.
- Citas
Cal Breaker: Well, he was your friend.
John Breaker: No he wasn't. Just because you know a man doesn't make him your friend.
- Bandas sonorasBattle Hymn of the Republic
Civil war song
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Warrant?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 24 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta