CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
2.5/10
2.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Al viajar a Venecia para investigar la misteriosa muerte de su padre, el famoso arqueólogo y buceador David descubre un secreto asesino que yace bajo las aguas venecianas.Al viajar a Venecia para investigar la misteriosa muerte de su padre, el famoso arqueólogo y buceador David descubre un secreto asesino que yace bajo las aguas venecianas.Al viajar a Venecia para investigar la misteriosa muerte de su padre, el famoso arqueólogo y buceador David descubre un secreto asesino que yace bajo las aguas venecianas.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Kaloian Vodenicharov
- Man in Black
- (as Kaloyan Vondenicharov)
Vladimir Kolev
- Assistant
- (as Vlado Kolev)
Assen Blatechki
- Operator
- (as Asen Blatechki)
Ivo Kehayov
- Cop
- (as Ivaylo Kehayov)
Dejan Angelov
- Henchman
- (sin créditos)
Vladimir Vladimirov
- Tourist
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I gave it five out of ten because Shark in Venice was even worse than i thought it could possibly be and my expectations were low. The acting is non existent and not in that good way where the actors seem like they are the characters and not acting. The plot as it is, meanders along tried and tested paths leaving you wondering what exactly the number of missing persons listed in Venice each year is for them to fail to notice the disappearance of so many people. It is reminiscent of a great episode of Only Fools and Horses where Del Boy tries to sell a film script to Rodney, which is supposed to be a whodunit, involving a killer Rhino living in secret, smack bang in the middle the city of London, hiding in an abandoned garage in the back streets and coming out every night to trample, gore and even possibly eat the unsuspecting residents of Old London Town.
Now lets face it, if you're serious enough about watching this movie to be even reading this comment then you're probably going to do it anyway because you're bored and like me you have a taste for B movies which involve large creatures eating people. i promise you if this film had been awful i would have given it 10 out of 10 for doing exactly what it said on the label, but this is the kind of bad which makes Anaconda look like an Oscar winner. Treat with care and enjoy whatever you can. But you were warned
Now lets face it, if you're serious enough about watching this movie to be even reading this comment then you're probably going to do it anyway because you're bored and like me you have a taste for B movies which involve large creatures eating people. i promise you if this film had been awful i would have given it 10 out of 10 for doing exactly what it said on the label, but this is the kind of bad which makes Anaconda look like an Oscar winner. Treat with care and enjoy whatever you can. But you were warned
Shark in Venice is proof that this awful shark movie fad was going on well before someone got really really really high and came up with the Sharknado (2013) franchise.
It tells the story of a man who discovers his father has been involved in a diving accident in Venice so he goes to investigate. During his time he discovers gangsters, hidden treasure and sharks..........or maybe shark singular it never really confirms that.
The shark(s) do however take a backseat as they aren't the focus of the movie as you'd expect. Instead it's a generic mindless action flick with a wafer thin plot, shoddy writing and acting that demonstrates they just didn't care.
Starring Stephen Baldwin it's another fine demonstration that the Baldwin acting family doesn't deserve the recognition it seems to have recieved and only Alec was born with any actual talent.
Shark in Venice is an embarassing mess and not even one for bad shark film enthusiasts.
The Good:
Cover art is good (Though dishonest)
The Bad:
Stock shark footage
Stock screams
Laughable script
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
POV bullets should not be a thing
Being crooked is fine and all sins forgiven if you do one single good thing
It tells the story of a man who discovers his father has been involved in a diving accident in Venice so he goes to investigate. During his time he discovers gangsters, hidden treasure and sharks..........or maybe shark singular it never really confirms that.
The shark(s) do however take a backseat as they aren't the focus of the movie as you'd expect. Instead it's a generic mindless action flick with a wafer thin plot, shoddy writing and acting that demonstrates they just didn't care.
Starring Stephen Baldwin it's another fine demonstration that the Baldwin acting family doesn't deserve the recognition it seems to have recieved and only Alec was born with any actual talent.
Shark in Venice is an embarassing mess and not even one for bad shark film enthusiasts.
The Good:
Cover art is good (Though dishonest)
The Bad:
Stock shark footage
Stock screams
Laughable script
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
POV bullets should not be a thing
Being crooked is fine and all sins forgiven if you do one single good thing
One of the whispering Baldwins travels to Venice to battle with a shark and a man with a beard.
Yet another cheap sharksploitation entry with the new angle of shark attacks in an urban environment. Hence, Venice. Although to be perfectly honest they hardly make the most of this potentially interesting, and agreeably moronic, set-up as the shark hardly attacks anyone other than various divers. And that sort of thing could happen in any shark movie let's be frank. Anyway the odd occasions that the shark does decide to attack tourists and drunken people on the surface prove to be the film's highlights, and these are few and far between.
Shark in Venice is effectively an action-thriller that pits good guy Baldwin against the machine-gun toting Mafioso bad guys. There's lots of shoot-outs and running about. The damn shark almost becomes incidental. Not exactly what we want. A much more accurate title for this film would have been Baldwin In Venice.
Yet another cheap sharksploitation entry with the new angle of shark attacks in an urban environment. Hence, Venice. Although to be perfectly honest they hardly make the most of this potentially interesting, and agreeably moronic, set-up as the shark hardly attacks anyone other than various divers. And that sort of thing could happen in any shark movie let's be frank. Anyway the odd occasions that the shark does decide to attack tourists and drunken people on the surface prove to be the film's highlights, and these are few and far between.
Shark in Venice is effectively an action-thriller that pits good guy Baldwin against the machine-gun toting Mafioso bad guys. There's lots of shoot-outs and running about. The damn shark almost becomes incidental. Not exactly what we want. A much more accurate title for this film would have been Baldwin In Venice.
I had pretty low expectations of this film just because of the ridiculous title,but this was even worse than expected.It was one of the the worst films I've seen all year,or any year.Quite frankly,it is **** of the highest order.I was hoping for enjoyable,tongue in cheek nonsense like Snakes On A Plane,but this was outrageously bad.I don't know which was the more embarrassing,the rubber looking shark or Stephen Baldwin's man boobs.
Seriously,there is nothing whatsoever to recommend this film apart from the fairly catchy title.I just dread the day when we see films like The Great Thames Piranha Invasion, or Silverback Gorillas Take Manhattan....
It may be called Shark In Venice,but it was actually made in Bulgaria.Judging this film,I will be careful to avoid any 'Bullywood' films in the future.
Seriously,there is nothing whatsoever to recommend this film apart from the fairly catchy title.I just dread the day when we see films like The Great Thames Piranha Invasion, or Silverback Gorillas Take Manhattan....
It may be called Shark In Venice,but it was actually made in Bulgaria.Judging this film,I will be careful to avoid any 'Bullywood' films in the future.
A B-Movie that makes a common mistake. It sidelines the perfectly ridiculous/stupid idea of Sharks in Venice, for a plot involving hidden treasure and the mafia. I didn't come here for no stale performances from humans, I wanted stock footage mixed with obvious CGI. I did get quite a bit of this, but not enough. As someone that appreciates the tacky genre, at least give me what you promise. Especially when the title is that clear. If not, then be more creative, such as "Mysteries of Venice", as this can relate to the treasure and the shark. Baldwin is a perfectly fine actor that takes, even this role, pretty seriously. There are unintentional laughs, bad accents and even epic medieval battles. It's got a lot, but not enough.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film features a character named Lt. Totti and at one point, when David Franks interrogates a mafia henchman he gives a location as "on the corner of DelPiero" these could be references to famous Italian football players Francesco Totti and Alessandro DelPiero
- ErroresThe mafia goons arrive by boat to kidnap Vanessa. As the boat pulls up to the dock, only the top half is visible, and its clearly on wheels.
- Citas
Laura: What do you think they were looking for, David?
David Franks: I'm not sure, but knowing my dad, whatever it was, I'll bet it's still here.
Laura: What do you mean?
David Franks: Well, Dad has always been rather... meticulous.
- ConexionesFeatured in Cinemassacre Video: Top 40 Shitty Shark Movies (2013)
- Bandas sonorasChoral Epic
Written and Performed by Stephen J.Edwards
Published by Source in Sync Music (ASCAP)/Engine Co 35(ASCAP)
Courtesy of 5 Alarm Music
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Shark in Venice?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Tiburón en Venecia (2008) officially released in India in English?
Responda