Collection

...because of the twenty-five 8, 9 and 10/10's out of the current 32 reviews! .... said no one. Ever. Smh. Lmao.

Shows how little faith the filmmakers have in their own film to post so many clearly b.s. Reviews.

The premise of the story was certainly original and very interesting, and considering this is newb writer and producer Todd M. Friedman's first dabble in the industry, he did ok. It'd been better had a seasoned filmmaker tweaked the screenplay, especially the convoluted and rushed ending.

Director Marianna Palka did a fairly decent job for a newb, but many scenes felt too long/unnecessary and needed editing, and the cinematography could've been much better. The score and soundtrack were actually very good, especially for a B-grade film.

I felt the leads performed well, and were convincing in their roles, except for Jacques Colimon, who didn't look or play the part convincingly enough.

It's a shame this low budget B film missed the mark, a few tweaks here and there would've made this one great. I would've given this a 6/10, but it's getting a very generous 5 for the sloppy ending and the attempts to fool potential viewers with the ridiculously obvious b.s. High reviews.

Where are all of the 9 and 10 stars coming from?!!! This movie had potential but completely failed at the end. Very confusing. It could've been a lot better. Watch if you're bored, but don't rush to see it.

Yes, social, because it focuses on the problems, financial issues, which many Americans have to deal with, debts they have to pay at any cost. Good material which it is easy to talk about. This story is also interesting because of the character depiction, they are not as disgusting as they should be, or as they could have been described in another film speaking of the same topic. Ambivalence is the main word to present this movie; the heroes are ruthless folks pushing poor people to pay their debts with money they don't even have.....Excellent directing skills for this female film maker. A golden gem for me, there are some like these from time to time, those features not necessarily in search of the box office gross. Another film David Ayer's TAX COLLECTOR, recently seen on Netflix and interesting too, but told in another different manner.

From 3rd party collection agencies? NO! Congress enacted the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a 1977 law that prohibits third-party collection agencies from "harassing, threatening and inappropriately contacting someone who owes money". And if you are getting these robocalls - hang up and block the call like I did and they can't force you to pay. That doesn't mean it won't clear your negative credit rating nor your debt; and i'm not encouraging a 'dodge' but arrange an afordable payment schedule from the original creditor, NOT the collection agency who gets a fee!

As for the film: It's strictly fictionalized entertainment nothing more.

The hangman in popularity according to north american research comes the dept collectors, and the financial system that breaks way for that kind of bountyhunting in our socalled civilized world. And dept collecting is exactly the topic to the film ''collection''.

I might as well throw the cloak away and just say that this film is terrible filmcraftmanship to say the least, the musical score gives some ressurection to the final result, the rest is just a great idea, ravaged by how not to write a screenplay, script and editing it all together ,are very amateuriscticly done. The small cast of hudlums maybe actors but they could at least pretend to be next time.

All in all if you hate the race of man that loves to torpedoe your life forever, and want a bit of himalayan salt tasty lovestory, be my guest, i shall not give it a second shot, therefore a no recommend from the grumpy old man.