Sigue las primeras aventuras del famoso simbólogo de Harvard Robert Langdon, quien se ve envuelto en una serie de acertijos cuando su mentor es secuestrado. La CIA lo obliga a unirse a un gr... Leer todoSigue las primeras aventuras del famoso simbólogo de Harvard Robert Langdon, quien se ve envuelto en una serie de acertijos cuando su mentor es secuestrado. La CIA lo obliga a unirse a un grupo de trabajo donde descubre una conspiración.Sigue las primeras aventuras del famoso simbólogo de Harvard Robert Langdon, quien se ve envuelto en una serie de acertijos cuando su mentor es secuestrado. La CIA lo obliga a unirse a un grupo de trabajo donde descubre una conspiración.
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
It's almost offensive how bad the acting is. These actors are giving us the least amount of effort possible. I feel like I'm watching a high school play where I suppose we should just be amazed they memorized the lines. Zero chemistry between actors. Zero suspense. Scenes are shot like absolutely no attempt was made to elicit an emotional response from viewers. Bland. Formulaic. Predictable. Saved By The Bell demonstrated more gripping storylines. If you enjoy this show, good, I'm glad you get something out of it. But I'm terribly sorry that you need your mysteries spoon fed to you by a D-Grade cast and crew who are completely out of their depth.
A young Robert Langdon is drawn into an ancient mystery when his mentor is kidnapped.
I really liked the lead, Ashley Zukerman, he played it serious, geeky and smart. No one else in the cast really stood out.
I also really liked the symbolic mystery-solving elements of the plot line, i.e. The traditional Langdon material, but the rest was mediocre US television drama.
The early episodes were good with the focus being on symbols and mysteries but then degenerates into any other unexceptional box set. For Langdon super fans only, I think.
I really liked the lead, Ashley Zukerman, he played it serious, geeky and smart. No one else in the cast really stood out.
I also really liked the symbolic mystery-solving elements of the plot line, i.e. The traditional Langdon material, but the rest was mediocre US television drama.
The early episodes were good with the focus being on symbols and mysteries but then degenerates into any other unexceptional box set. For Langdon super fans only, I think.
The thing about dan browns books is the pacing . This attempt to do something with Dan Browns world of mysteries and symbolism in a 1 hour show gives us a cheap feeling unrealistic bore .
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
No it's not a polished Hollywood movie with lots of money and famous faces but it is entertaining and worth your time...if there's nothing better to do.
Update: I'm glad I ignored the negative reviews because it got better as I watched, take the time and judge for yourself.
Update: I'm glad I ignored the negative reviews because it got better as I watched, take the time and judge for yourself.
I've read all of the books, and all but Origins more than once. Yes, the books are fast paced, as are the movies made so far. It's refreshing that they've slowed it down a bit. The decision to have a younger Langdon works for me as it gives us the opportunity to see him at a time where he's still learning, that he doesn't have all the answers at the drop of a hat. Every profession requires time to "catch on". I personally don't see a political agenda. That's usually for those that are looking for one or complain because something doesn't align with THEIR beliefs, aka confirmation bias.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaBased on 'The Lost Symbol', Dan Brown's third book in his Robert Langdon series. Sony planned to adapt the book as the third movie in the movie franchise early in the 2010s, following El código Da Vinci (2006) and Ángeles y demonios (2009). However, production of that adaptation became too complicated as Ron Howard preferred to only produce it rather than directing, and Tom Hanks would not be returning as Professor Robert Langdon. In the end, the production took so long that the novel 'Inferno' was released in 2013, and Sony decided to skip 'The Lost Symbol' and make Inferno (2016) instead, for which most of the crew of the previous films returned, including Howard as director and Hanks as the main character. Because the series is a prequel to the movies, Hanks was replaced as the younger Langdon with Ashley Zukerman, but Brown, Howard and franchise producer Brian Grazer have remained on board as executive producers.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Lost Symbol have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for The Lost Symbol (2021)?
Responda