CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.5/10
9.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un médium espiritista sostiene una sesión para un escritor que sufre de bloqueo, pero accidentalmente invoca el espíritu de su primera esposa fallecida, lo que lleva a un triángulo amoroso c... Leer todoUn médium espiritista sostiene una sesión para un escritor que sufre de bloqueo, pero accidentalmente invoca el espíritu de su primera esposa fallecida, lo que lleva a un triángulo amoroso cada vez más complejo con su actual esposa.Un médium espiritista sostiene una sesión para un escritor que sufre de bloqueo, pero accidentalmente invoca el espíritu de su primera esposa fallecida, lo que lleva a un triángulo amoroso cada vez más complejo con su actual esposa.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Michele Dotrice
- Edna
- (as Michelle Dotrice)
Peter A Rogers
- Alfred Hitchcock
- (as Peter Rogers)
Opiniones destacadas
I have never seen the original play or movie, so I'm not making a comparison. I think the main problem of this movie is that it lacks in rhythm. It felt too long despite being only an hour and a half. However, I still had a good time watching it. There are some true laugh-out-loud moments and everyone gives a good comedic performance. Also, the costumes and sets are gorgeous. Apparently, there have been a lot of changes from the original story, but I thought this story was good. My rhythm issue came more from some of the dialogue and the editing, I think. You won't be wasting your time watching it, but don't expect a masterpiece.
The only levels on which this adaptation succeeds is that it opens the play up so it feels less theatrical. However the new script on retains only a scattering of the Noel Coward dialogue and the new stuff makes all the characters unlikable and tedious. They've even made Madame Arcati's character far less quirky and quite bland. Can't image who the makers think this will appeal to. Traditional Coward fans will hate it and it has nothing to recommend it to anyone else.
Any time we see a movie, we have to suspend disbelief in order to get into the fictional world of a film (that's not a documentary). The huge problem with Blithe Spirit is that much of it was so unbelievable as to make it almost impossible to suspend disbelief and therefore impossible to watch.
Basically, the main theme of this version of Noel Coward's play, is that after the main male character's deceased ex-wife is summoned forth from a medium who's supposed to be a fraud (Judi Dench), said deceased ex-wife sets out to get between her former husband and his now (living) wife. For me, the big problem here was that the husband, a crime-writer, acts in such a stupid and irrational way that the whole film just seems ridiculous. Plus, the former wife, played to the hilt by Leslie Mann, was a stereotype of the vengeful scorned wife, even though anyone who is rational would recognize that that's not what she really was.
Specifically, once he has "seen" the ghost of his former wife and realizes others don't see her, he should have altered his behavior accordingly. Instead he keeps repeating the same moronic behavior over and over which just served to make me angry. Did the director and/or scriptwriter really think an audience would go for this?
Despite this major flaw, the film was visually engaging and busy enough to keep me watching despite my annoyance.
Basically, the main theme of this version of Noel Coward's play, is that after the main male character's deceased ex-wife is summoned forth from a medium who's supposed to be a fraud (Judi Dench), said deceased ex-wife sets out to get between her former husband and his now (living) wife. For me, the big problem here was that the husband, a crime-writer, acts in such a stupid and irrational way that the whole film just seems ridiculous. Plus, the former wife, played to the hilt by Leslie Mann, was a stereotype of the vengeful scorned wife, even though anyone who is rational would recognize that that's not what she really was.
Specifically, once he has "seen" the ghost of his former wife and realizes others don't see her, he should have altered his behavior accordingly. Instead he keeps repeating the same moronic behavior over and over which just served to make me angry. Did the director and/or scriptwriter really think an audience would go for this?
Despite this major flaw, the film was visually engaging and busy enough to keep me watching despite my annoyance.
I didn't laugh even once. It wasn't even a dark comedy. There simply weren't any jokes in it. Like, none. The production value is top notch and the acting is pretty good but that's about all there is to it. The story is quite boring actually. Nothing original. Judy Dench is great of course.
So much more could have been done with this. Some characters were poorly cast. It was underwhelming. The concept is good but it missed the mark in my opinion.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThere have been many filmed adaptations of Noël Coward's play, including Blithe Spirit (1956) in which writer Noël Coward himself plays the lead role alongside Claudette Colbert and Lauren Bacall, but the most popular version is Un espectro travieso (1945) starring Rex Harrison, Constance Cummings, Margaret Rutherford and Kay Hammond and directed by David Lean.
- ErroresEarly on, Condomine puts a record on an acoustic gramophone and puts the needle down to the left of the spindle, where it would dig into the record if it would play at all. (The image has not been reversed because the record is still turning clockwise.)
- Citas
Charles Condomine: Two's company--three's a nightmare
- ConexionesReferences Mata Hari (1931)
- Bandas sonorasLeaning on a Rainbow
Performed by Michael Ball
Written by Ian Brown (as Ian W. Brown), Jake Field, Simon Johnson
Courtesy of Mighty Village/EMI Music Publishing Ltd
Courtesy of Decca Records
Under license from Universal Music Operations Limited
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Blithe Spirit?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Колишня з того світу
- Locaciones de filmación
- Joldwynds, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking, Surrey, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Condomines' house)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 282,500
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 88,559
- 21 feb 2021
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 964,832
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 39min(99 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta