Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt: Kimmy vs. el reverendo
Título original: Kimmy vs the Reverend
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.9/10
6.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Kimmy Schmidt se embarca en su mayor aventura. ¡Tres estados! ¡Explosiones! ¡Una hamburguesa bailarina! Y tú, como parte de la audiencia, decides qué pasará en la historia.Kimmy Schmidt se embarca en su mayor aventura. ¡Tres estados! ¡Explosiones! ¡Una hamburguesa bailarina! Y tú, como parte de la audiencia, decides qué pasará en la historia.Kimmy Schmidt se embarca en su mayor aventura. ¡Tres estados! ¡Explosiones! ¡Una hamburguesa bailarina! Y tú, como parte de la audiencia, decides qué pasará en la historia.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 2 premios Primetime Emmy
- 6 nominaciones en total
Opiniones destacadas
As the title says what is the point of having multiple choices if you don't actually have that much influence story anyway? You might just as well have shown me a movie without the whole dragging of the story by choosing the "wrong" things. It tried, for me personally it failed. Maybe I didn't try enough choices to actually enjoy it, but after finishing it I didn't really feel like trying again.
This follow-up special to the comedy The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt is one of those interactive programs that have been popping up on Netflix. This was a pretty fun experience.
First off, like the original show there are a ton of very funny lines. Also like the show, I felt there were a fair amount of types of jokes that the writers were more into than the audience is. (All the bits about Titus (Tituss Burgess) being lazy get old).
Though not the first to interactive stories, this special has it's own spin. Given Kimmy's emotionally stunted nature, this special specifically pays homage to the Choose-Your-Own-Adventure stories. Now, the amount of basic storylines you can go through only goes so far. (Unless you're a completionist, you'll probably go through 1-3 viewings.) However, the writers seem to realize this. The same scenes can alter in lines or be extended based on choices. The viewer is even rewarded for choosing the same options twice. Also like CYOA, there are dead ends that are often some of the cleverest bits and provide some fun moments of the characters talking directly to the audience.
The cast remains strong. The special manages to include all the regularly recurring characters. Ellie Kemper continues to do an excellent job as Kimmy. She has such range being able to switch from childish to serious perfectly. Jon Hamm returns as the evil Richard Wayne Gary Wayne and continues to kill it. I feel guilty liking the performance, because the character has done such terrible, deplorable things but almost every line of his is gold. Daniel Radcliffe appears in this as Kimmy's fiance, and having a great sense of comedy he fits in perfectly. He works really well off of Kemper. (Although, I felt Radcliffe was a subject of too many obvious, broad British jokes.)
The special looks great, continuing the show's brightly colored and lit aesthetic.
Overall, I recommend this. However, if you're one of those people who may have felt the show dropped in quality after season 1, be forewarned that this does feel like that part of the show.
First off, like the original show there are a ton of very funny lines. Also like the show, I felt there were a fair amount of types of jokes that the writers were more into than the audience is. (All the bits about Titus (Tituss Burgess) being lazy get old).
Though not the first to interactive stories, this special has it's own spin. Given Kimmy's emotionally stunted nature, this special specifically pays homage to the Choose-Your-Own-Adventure stories. Now, the amount of basic storylines you can go through only goes so far. (Unless you're a completionist, you'll probably go through 1-3 viewings.) However, the writers seem to realize this. The same scenes can alter in lines or be extended based on choices. The viewer is even rewarded for choosing the same options twice. Also like CYOA, there are dead ends that are often some of the cleverest bits and provide some fun moments of the characters talking directly to the audience.
The cast remains strong. The special manages to include all the regularly recurring characters. Ellie Kemper continues to do an excellent job as Kimmy. She has such range being able to switch from childish to serious perfectly. Jon Hamm returns as the evil Richard Wayne Gary Wayne and continues to kill it. I feel guilty liking the performance, because the character has done such terrible, deplorable things but almost every line of his is gold. Daniel Radcliffe appears in this as Kimmy's fiance, and having a great sense of comedy he fits in perfectly. He works really well off of Kemper. (Although, I felt Radcliffe was a subject of too many obvious, broad British jokes.)
The special looks great, continuing the show's brightly colored and lit aesthetic.
Overall, I recommend this. However, if you're one of those people who may have felt the show dropped in quality after season 1, be forewarned that this does feel like that part of the show.
This is how you close a franchise. I mean, a lot of shows have those emotional "the end"'s. We know it's goodbye but it shouldn't always be emotional. You should be happy that you watched the series from the beginning to the very end.
Ok, listen up I don't really like choose your own adventures. Bandersnatch wasn't what it cracked up to be but gotta say this new Kimmy movie is so damn funny!! Every choice we take, good or bad, is HILARIOUS and good thing is we don't really have to repeat stuff again and again! It's done right!
Glad to see the core four back! I love all of them but gotta give a shoutout to Jane Krakowski because I love her so much! The guest actors are pretty funny too!
Story wise, it actually adds to the main series so that's great.
GO ON HAVE FUN NOW!!!!
Glad to see the core four back! I love all of them but gotta give a shoutout to Jane Krakowski because I love her so much! The guest actors are pretty funny too!
Story wise, it actually adds to the main series so that's great.
GO ON HAVE FUN NOW!!!!
This is Kimmy Schmidt at its best. No matter what option you choose you usually always get a laugh and besides the choices, it's a really good movie that adds onto Kimmy and her friends' lives without ruining anything set up in the series. I absolutely loved it and I've already watched it more than once!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaJacqueline tells Titus that if he drops out of his movie he'll have to go back to making "stupid karaoke videos." In a previous scene, when Lillian (or Cyndee) is singing, if you look at the karaoke video in the background, you can see that Titus is in the video.
- ErroresThe baby in the gas station in Peabody Falls that the owner leaves for Kimmy and Titus to worry about keeps changing between shots. One of the child actors has a unibrow that distinguishes them from the other(s).
- Citas
Prince Frederick: [talking to Kimmy about his wedding vows] And you'll never guess what I rhymed with shimmy, Kimmy. Ugh, bugger!
- Créditos curiososIf you click "Skip intro" for the show as one can in Netflix shows, Mike Britt (the "they alive, dammit!" guy) appears in front of the screen and mock-scolds the viewer for trying to skip the credits, presenting an even longer opening credits sequence.
- ConexionesFeatured in The 2020 Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards (2020)
- Bandas sonorasThe 12 Days of Christmas
(uncredited)
Traditional (with alternate lyrics)
Performed by Taco Snake
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt: Kimmy vs the Reverend
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 20 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt: Kimmy vs. el reverendo (2020) officially released in Canada in French?
Responda