CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.0/10
12 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un médico caído en desgracia y su familia son rehenes en su propio hogar, retenidos por unos criminales a la fuga cuando un robo armado les sale mal y uno de ellos necesita atención médica.Un médico caído en desgracia y su familia son rehenes en su propio hogar, retenidos por unos criminales a la fuga cuando un robo armado les sale mal y uno de ellos necesita atención médica.Un médico caído en desgracia y su familia son rehenes en su propio hogar, retenidos por unos criminales a la fuga cuando un robo armado les sale mal y uno de ellos necesita atención médica.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The only reason I watched this was because Bruce Willis was featured. I can't imagine why he decided to act in/put his name on this film. I am astonished at how disappointing this movie was. Willis's son's wife is a plastic surgery nightmare. The characters have dozens of opportunities to save themselves from their predicament. What a disappointment of a thriller. Waste of time.
There were more plot holes than the unnecessarily long and sappy 90 minute cat and mouse runtime smh. I get that this is amateur writer Doug Wolfe's first ever writing credit, but c'mon, didn't anyone else proofread this ridiculous long dragged out mess?
Here's the math: of the 90 min runtime, subtract 7 mins for opening and post credits. Then we have 20 mins of some bad guys involved in, what, I don't know, that also pull off a stupid stunt, as well as the Brady Bunch family, where the son is a failure, for, I don't know what. The remaining 60+ minutes is the most ridiculous and illogical plot-riddled to the point of hilariousness cat-and-mouse game, with dragged out long and useless scenes. Add the soap-opera sappy dialogue between two brothers, and the father and son trying to rekindle their relationship - amidst the so called terror. Escape, come back, hide, get caught, repeat. And even for criminals, the stupidity in their actions were laughable. It got annoying very fast. Had this film been a 20 min short, it may have received a 5 or 6 from me.
Bruce Willis was his usual "look at me I'm Bruce Willis" attitude with his stale monotonic washed-up tough-guy demeanor. But that I expected going into this, because anything worse than a Bruce Willis film, is another Bruce Willis film. Even the pretty Lydia Hull, who oddly is in almost every Willis film, was boring and stale. The rest of the cast were ok, with the bad guys being the most convincing, and made the effort to act. I'm sure failure from the director to direct his cast properly was a big part of the rest of the characters' failed acting.
The directing was also sub-par with some terrible editing. For a b-grade film, the score wasn't as annoying as I'd expected it to be, but still somewhat overbearing and unfitting. The cinematography was ok, but bad in the night outdoor scenes.
If you watch this film at 5x faster speed, even without hearing any dialogue, you'll get the gist of the entire story, which is nothing new and done many times before. Sadly, it's a generous 3/10 from me, and I will never get my 90 minutes back.
Here's the math: of the 90 min runtime, subtract 7 mins for opening and post credits. Then we have 20 mins of some bad guys involved in, what, I don't know, that also pull off a stupid stunt, as well as the Brady Bunch family, where the son is a failure, for, I don't know what. The remaining 60+ minutes is the most ridiculous and illogical plot-riddled to the point of hilariousness cat-and-mouse game, with dragged out long and useless scenes. Add the soap-opera sappy dialogue between two brothers, and the father and son trying to rekindle their relationship - amidst the so called terror. Escape, come back, hide, get caught, repeat. And even for criminals, the stupidity in their actions were laughable. It got annoying very fast. Had this film been a 20 min short, it may have received a 5 or 6 from me.
Bruce Willis was his usual "look at me I'm Bruce Willis" attitude with his stale monotonic washed-up tough-guy demeanor. But that I expected going into this, because anything worse than a Bruce Willis film, is another Bruce Willis film. Even the pretty Lydia Hull, who oddly is in almost every Willis film, was boring and stale. The rest of the cast were ok, with the bad guys being the most convincing, and made the effort to act. I'm sure failure from the director to direct his cast properly was a big part of the rest of the characters' failed acting.
The directing was also sub-par with some terrible editing. For a b-grade film, the score wasn't as annoying as I'd expected it to be, but still somewhat overbearing and unfitting. The cinematography was ok, but bad in the night outdoor scenes.
If you watch this film at 5x faster speed, even without hearing any dialogue, you'll get the gist of the entire story, which is nothing new and done many times before. Sadly, it's a generous 3/10 from me, and I will never get my 90 minutes back.
Even though I watched it with very low expectations but it was able to disappoint me, with this kind of movies you only hope for action but the director wasn't able to deliver any good action sequences through out the movie adding the immature screenwriting and really bad acting especially from the lead actor and the daughter made this movie annoying and hard to watch but at least Bruce Willis showed up for this one, go watch Hostage or Trespass instead of this cheap
Bruce, are you bored or something? Got a huge debt? Why do you keep showing up in these seriously bad movies with scripts as if they were written in the late 80ies or early 90ies?
You have been in so many good movies, it's weird that I no longer can take it for granted that it's a quality film if your name is on it.
You have been in so many good movies, it's weird that I no longer can take it for granted that it's a quality film if your name is on it.
Don't waste 1.30 hours of your life. Even with Bruce Willis, the movie sucks in every way.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilmed in and around Columbus, GA, this film features some local actors, including Riley Wolfe Rach (Riley), Jef Holbrook (clerk) and Sara Lynn Holbrook (woman in store). Jef Holbrook is also credited in the crew as "Local Casting/Casting Associate" and Sara Lynn Holbrook is also credited in the crew as "Studio Teacher/Child Labor Coordinator".
- Errores"When Jamie is shooting at Frank, he shoots at Frank seven times! There isn't a seven shot revolver." A common mistake is to believe there are only 6 round revolvers. Likely, in this case, it is a goof but 7 and 8 round have become more common including .357/.38SPC with there being 10 Rnd revolvers as well.
- ConexionesReferenced in Half in the Bag: Censor (2021)
- Bandas sonorasOpening
Performed and Written by Nima Fakhrara
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Survive the Night?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Sobrevive la noche
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 3,500,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 220,371
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Hindi language plot outline for Survive the Night (2020)?
Responda