Agrega una trama en tu idiomaThe crew members of NASA's Apollo missions tell their story in their own words.The crew members of NASA's Apollo missions tell their story in their own words.The crew members of NASA's Apollo missions tell their story in their own words.
- Premios
- 6 premios ganados y 13 nominaciones en total
Jim Lovell
- Self
- (as James Lovell)
Edgar D. Mitchell
- Self
- (as Edgar Mitchell)
Dave Scott
- Self
- (as David Scott)
William Anders
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Neil Armstrong
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Stephen Armstrong
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Viola Armstrong
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Jules Bergman
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Frank Borman
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Roger B. Chaffee
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Yuri Gagarin
- Self
- (material de archivo)
‘Snow White’ Stars Test Their Wits
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaOf all the astronauts who appeared in the film, only Buzz Aldrin demanded to be paid.
- ErroresThe 1202 alarm was not a programming error in the Apollo Guidance Computer, but rather a hardware design bug, already documented by Apollo 5 engineers. Since the 1202 alarm had occurred only once during testing, NASA decided to go with the radar hardware with known problems instead of using untested newer alternatives with unknown problems.
- Citas
Charlie Duke: My father was born shortly after the Wright Brothers. He could barely believe that I went to the Moon. But my son, Tom, was five. And he didn't think it was any big deal.
- ConexionesAlternate-language version of Universum: Im Schatten des Mondes (2009)
Opinión destacada
Saw this film at Sundance, the screening reserved for the Grand Jury World Documentary Award Winner. Wow! I have seen many of the preceding documentaries on the history of the American space program, the Apollo program in particular. Where this documentary exceeds all previous efforts was in revealing the humanity of the astronauts. Most other documentaries focus on the politics which motivated and technical hurdles overcome in the American space program. David Sington brilliantly uses only the astronauts voices for narration of facts and more with newly released footage from NASA, as well as a lot of footage we've all seen before. Because of the free rein given to the astronauts in the interviews, you see many sides of each revealed. For instance, Mike Collins (who has heretofore rarely been interviewed) reveals wonderful humor and joy in his accomplishments. You find out more about their worries and fears, how they look back on their work and what they were thinking at the time. They are all revealed as nice guys with whom you would want to spend an afternoon.
Strangely absent, but it works well in the end, was Armstrong. He gives virtually no interviews. In a way, having everyone else talk about him is maybe better than him talking.
And, the various conspiracy theories are dealt with in the end credits. This is a great place to do it. In films we sometimes see the end credits used for humorous out-takes, epilogue commentary, and so forth. By dealing with the conspiracy theories in an appended manner during the credits, the film refuses to elevate them to the level of legitimacy that the remainder of the facts and biographical material, yet still dismisses them. The single best dismissal is this: If it was all faked, why did they fake it so many times? Wouldn't once have been enough?
See this film when it comes to your neighborhood theater, as it has been announced as having a distribution deal. It is worth seeing on the big screen for its amazing visuals.
Strangely absent, but it works well in the end, was Armstrong. He gives virtually no interviews. In a way, having everyone else talk about him is maybe better than him talking.
And, the various conspiracy theories are dealt with in the end credits. This is a great place to do it. In films we sometimes see the end credits used for humorous out-takes, epilogue commentary, and so forth. By dealing with the conspiracy theories in an appended manner during the credits, the film refuses to elevate them to the level of legitimacy that the remainder of the facts and biographical material, yet still dismisses them. The single best dismissal is this: If it was all faked, why did they fake it so many times? Wouldn't once have been enough?
See this film when it comes to your neighborhood theater, as it has been announced as having a distribution deal. It is worth seeing on the big screen for its amazing visuals.
- pbernhardt
- 27 ene 2007
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is In the Shadow of the Moon?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- У тіні Місяця
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 2,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 1,134,358
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 38,281
- 9 sep 2007
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 2,161,369
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 40 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was In the Shadow of the Moon (2007) officially released in India in English?
Responda