Agrega una trama en tu idiomaWhen Chris is thrown from the balcony of a high-rise block of flats, suspicion falls on his flatmate Dean, who is profoundly deaf.When Chris is thrown from the balcony of a high-rise block of flats, suspicion falls on his flatmate Dean, who is profoundly deaf.When Chris is thrown from the balcony of a high-rise block of flats, suspicion falls on his flatmate Dean, who is profoundly deaf.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Ganó 1 premio BAFTA
- 2 premios ganados y 2 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Recently, I watched 'The Man Who Wasn't There' on late-night TV, and the film was accompanied by signing. I found it almost unwatchable as a result. The whole point of this film is that the central character's language (both spoken and physical) is completely deadpan, and in conventional terms, inappropriate, in spite of the extreme situations he faces. But the signer was making big faces and extravagant gestures throughout the movie. Maybe this is an unusual film, maybe this was just a bad signer, but perhaps, one of the difficulties deaf people face is an inability to partake in the full subtlety of human interaction (the alternative view being that deaf people have wholly adequate means of communication and their main disability is the prejudice of the hearing). But these questions returned to me on watching 'Soundproof', a drama featuring both deaf and hearing characters, centred on the involvement of a volunteer translator in a police investigation. The film was quite effective in conveying the difficulties that deaf people can have. But some of the human interaction in the film seemed perfunctory. Perhaps this is because as a non-deaf individual, I don't know how to read the signs; perhaps it reflect the reality of life for the deaf; perhaps it's just a falling of this drama, but I found is hard to really believe in the characters' inter-relationships, or relate to them myself. I guess it didn't help that the two lead characters (one deaf, one not) were both treated with unearned sympathy throughout, while the bigoted character seemed fated from the start not to be redeemed. Perhaps the film's real failing was its attempt, through the character of the interpreter, to bridge two worlds at once. A story set wholly in the world of the deaf would not only have been braver, but also more enlightening.
I saw this movie on BBC America.
The plot line was believable, and I found myself able to identify with the main characters and their plight.
The movie contained flashbacks which were sometimes hard to follow, but once I caught on to how they were being set up, I enjoyed this aspect of the film.
It was so good I wanted to show it to my friends, but I haven't been able to find it lately in the BBC America schedule. Does anyone know when it will be shown again? This was a movie truly worth seeing again! Hopefully, it will be back on TV soon, so if anyone knows when, please let me know through this log.
The plot line was believable, and I found myself able to identify with the main characters and their plight.
The movie contained flashbacks which were sometimes hard to follow, but once I caught on to how they were being set up, I enjoyed this aspect of the film.
It was so good I wanted to show it to my friends, but I haven't been able to find it lately in the BBC America schedule. Does anyone know when it will be shown again? This was a movie truly worth seeing again! Hopefully, it will be back on TV soon, so if anyone knows when, please let me know through this log.
I have just finished watching the premier of Soundproof on BBC2. I decided to catch it having read a preview in one of the papers, it sounded an interesting concept, one which could be make an original stab at the typical British urban thriller.
It was hyped as being the first drama in which sign language plays a major part in the plot. The result, like watching a subtitled film, is that you rely on your eyes rather than ears to take you through the plot. The acting was simply outstanding, Jospeh Mawl showed real emotion throughout his entire body, not just a quivering lip. It brought you into the character's sense of frustration, where he could not express yourself fully when it really mattered. The plot, one of four flatmates falls from a balcony, did not twist and turn like most thrillers on the BBC (Waking the Dead and Silent Witness), it was lean allowing the actors to really explore your characters, and for the viewer to completely immerse themselves in the claustrophobic experience.
It was hyped as being the first drama in which sign language plays a major part in the plot. The result, like watching a subtitled film, is that you rely on your eyes rather than ears to take you through the plot. The acting was simply outstanding, Jospeh Mawl showed real emotion throughout his entire body, not just a quivering lip. It brought you into the character's sense of frustration, where he could not express yourself fully when it really mattered. The plot, one of four flatmates falls from a balcony, did not twist and turn like most thrillers on the BBC (Waking the Dead and Silent Witness), it was lean allowing the actors to really explore your characters, and for the viewer to completely immerse themselves in the claustrophobic experience.
Deaf CSI nothing else to be said
It's a 5, 6 if you're into those kinds of shows. Nothing special about it and the I translator makes nothing moments feel even longer than they need too.
Flatmates Chris, Connor, Dean and Jak return to their flat with their friends having stocked up on drink to continue their evening with a house party. The night ends abruptly when Chris falls from the balcony of the high rise flat. The police are called and everyone is questioned as to what happened, the relationship between those involved and the specifics of the night. As Dean is deaf, the police call in interpreter Penny to assist with the sign language. When Chris dies in hospital a few days later, the police bring in a couple of suspects for questions and Penny yet again finds herself questioning Dean while at the same time starting an entirely inappropriate relationship with him.
This film was sold in the UK on the back of it being an unusual mix of hearing and deaf actors using a mix of words and sign language. In fairness this aspect of it is a selling point because it is a rarity for a mainstream (primetime BBC2) dramatic film, but it is not the only thing it has going for it and you quickly get past the novelty value of this after the first 15 minutes or so. After this it just becomes a pretty good mystery drama that follows the current struggles of Dean and Penny, spliced through with flashbacks of the night leading up to Chris' death. It is an effective story that works well even if it could have done with a bit more pace and urgency at times. Instead of slickness it aims for a bit of depth but I didn't think it had the material required to pull it off providing a backbone to the tale even if I wanted a nervous system and heart as well.
The cast are all pretty good. Lynch is good as our way into the story but her dilemmas are placed secondary as the film progresses and her role within the tale is not as concrete as I would have liked. Mawle is impressive as Dean and the film belongs to him. The material takes him an obvious path and I felt it pushed him away from the road where he could have developed more of a person, but he is still very strong. Support from Dunbar, Stuke, Colgan and others is all solid enough with no bad performances but on the whole the film was with Mawle and Lynch.
A good one-off drama then. Perhaps not as strong a film as the "deaf cast" hype would have suggested but it is still a good mystery with an enjoyable narrative and roundly good performances.
This film was sold in the UK on the back of it being an unusual mix of hearing and deaf actors using a mix of words and sign language. In fairness this aspect of it is a selling point because it is a rarity for a mainstream (primetime BBC2) dramatic film, but it is not the only thing it has going for it and you quickly get past the novelty value of this after the first 15 minutes or so. After this it just becomes a pretty good mystery drama that follows the current struggles of Dean and Penny, spliced through with flashbacks of the night leading up to Chris' death. It is an effective story that works well even if it could have done with a bit more pace and urgency at times. Instead of slickness it aims for a bit of depth but I didn't think it had the material required to pull it off providing a backbone to the tale even if I wanted a nervous system and heart as well.
The cast are all pretty good. Lynch is good as our way into the story but her dilemmas are placed secondary as the film progresses and her role within the tale is not as concrete as I would have liked. Mawle is impressive as Dean and the film belongs to him. The material takes him an obvious path and I felt it pushed him away from the road where he could have developed more of a person, but he is still very strong. Support from Dunbar, Stuke, Colgan and others is all solid enough with no bad performances but on the whole the film was with Mawle and Lynch.
A good one-off drama then. Perhaps not as strong a film as the "deaf cast" hype would have suggested but it is still a good mystery with an enjoyable narrative and roundly good performances.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaTelevision movie drama debut for Joseph Mawle.
- ConexionesFeatured in See Hear: Episode #34.5 (2014)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta